Sri B Abdul Wajid vs The State Of Karnataka on 23 October, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Sri B Abdul Wajid vs The State Of Karnataka on 23 October, 2010
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF OCTOBER 

BEFORE

THE I-ION'BLE MRJUSTICE RAM_MOI:1AN~ V': O'

WRIT PETITION No.    

BEEEWEEN

SR1 B ABDUL WAJID _ ._

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS  ~

S/O MOHAMMED DASTAOIEI V
R/O D NO 4375/AL3, 11.53053   A '-A
ST MARY'S ROA'D;._N"_'R MQHALLA   ' ''

MYSORE

   A   I    PETITIONER
{BY SR1v.----SvL1.ABBMAi2;:A.& O-BA;;ANNA.V.ADvs.)

AND

1. THE'S'l'ATE OF 1'IARNP_TAKA
_DEPAF<1V{TENT' .OF~.ED~UcAT1ON REPRESENTED
4 BY. ITS SECRETARY
g  BD1LDI§\z'G.,.._D.Rv B R AMBEDKAR ROAD
' BANGALORE 1

   I E'THEDOCOt»1M1SS1ONER OF DEPARTMENT OF

A  PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS. NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
 BANOALORE1

 3.  JOINT DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION)

;  DEPARMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION
 NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE 1

M



|
IN.)
I

4. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER
SOUTH ZONE, MYSORE

5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL
PARK ROAD, OPP KPSC
BANGALORE 1

{BY SR1. RAGHAVENDRA G. OAYATHHI, OIPT1  °

:  u . 

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDEi'i"~ART1CLES' 2Vée:AND*~22'7 OFVE

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYINOTO DECLARE  THE
ACTION OF THE THiRD.__ RESP'ONDENT_ IN iN'iTIA'I'£NC} THE
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS 'DT;.j_'1V3'."c'$_L2.()aU7b AS ILLEGAL AND
ALSO THE IMPUTATION OE e'HARc.ES'1.*'EE"QUASHED VIDE
ANNEXURE--E AND 1_)IRf:'.CT'THE  RESPONDENT TO SETTLE

THE EENEEiTS”«~ OE’-I PETITIONER IN
ACCORDANCE'”WITH–‘;LA\V}_ ‘ ‘V

:THiS*W:.i;P. IASF; eO”M1aN-O (3N”‘I}«”():R PRELIMINARY HEARING
THIS DAY,=THE tCa’jII__R’T_ FOLLOWING:

\VORDER

Reserying Elibefty to the petitioner, a PhySiea1~1

I EV(.3O%~ordinatOr in the Services of the State, to

q1i«eSti;OI1.,EA §7’the action of the State in initiating

A.d,e_part~ri’1enta1 proceedings under Rule 214(2)(b) of the

Kafnataka Civil Service Rules, post retirement on

LA

31 / 5 / 2007 , by making necessary application before the

Karnataka Administrative Tribunal constituted

the Karnataka Administrative Tribunals _

since the lis relates to a “service ..matter”” ‘as –:C_’1€:fined is *

Sec.3(q) of the said Act, the a¢co’£dm%g1y*

rejected.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *