Sri B Jayaraman vs The Regional Transport Officer on 6 August, 2010

nz Tm man mam': air K£§i%€2%"'§'&.'§% gr ggfiisazggg
mama mza THE 5% my wmags?

EEFQRE

THE Ir§Q£'¥"BLE 2%. gusxmg $:;S§§_§}=§. fa;;"§i§':--5:%.:f:;'§?'§3:f;~:aiEa: M' "

WE?!' PE*mm~r z~§§.23§:iLA9 §s% 1?:*T2%:T:;%  _

Bifivmga:

    

am B.».3A    ~

am am   
am::aAEc;::*r4aYEA1e:és;T--. = A 1 .. A-
§s.1;93_mam¢K--g,  ._ V  
'P,V$.§&K§;13E}, xs7~A:*:**:*z::;méi:*'§'.e;s.;; migzxxg I  
   §E"£"I'T§"§$I*¥§.'«R
my 3;:&§i:§_;§§34"§§. .§¥;:r7I°§§E§*:;f?.§.'£'7.§s;.§§5g.3 aisvm my. $3
:: _ .... ..   ., V  ~
3. *i"s§E?   awmm
 ::é;:%.:$g;;:a, §.t%E€'§%"£.QEE

2' 4 g ' "1'*E€IE mmam: ms' 3&3-':*m: vgfiiams
  g.g:::m2%L' v:?:.;::$:s1:%§r §§'F1$E

 

X   :§_  i:?%§:Lé,'%%s:;€;a%'Eea$?$amE $32 méicg

' sammmz, wagsx $"$:"§'E'§$?%'
- ..      
..  §E$§$£€DEI°iF'1'$

    

{B53 SREIK M S§'fiVfiY$Z§§$§€'£MY3 HC§P}

TI-{I3 $31' ?E"Pfi'§$E§' f*?§Efi *{§Z'%'§ER IKRTEELE Qfifi

   2?'? QF' 'i'fi§3 flQ§¥3'?'E'§{I'FI§E§ Q? Wfififi ?RFs.YEG T3

QUASET TEE SEQZFRE figfifig §3$I}E§ §§ fififififi Nflfi?
DATED 2§.fi.§3,  EE UEEER Aififii/{EEK}?-E BY $$'{}E
{JF Vw"E};'Z' $§" C§§TI€f?Ké.R§ <%  Sifflfi G'§'fiER
RELEF$i

 



2

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE' FOLLOWING: ' 

ORDER

The petitioner has raised the challenge, it ‘v

order, dated 29.6.2010 seizing his=..yehir§ié:.R”~ea,. ” O .

2. Sri
Government Pleader V appeajifigh _ _ the it Rfespibyridents
submits that the first :hasR__’_’.re1eased the
vehicle pursuanttef ‘esnipeunding fee by

the petitioned”. J” ‘ R J R

3. –T’hi.s Vpeftitiun”isA_.therefore dismissed as having

become inffu_cRtu,o1V1s. ” V

….. I
JUDGE