:9: THE HIGH comm’ OF KARNATAKA, BA?§GA£:§f§_ E-.
BATED THIS THE 13% DAY 0:-§%jsEI*rE:~m;E;~1é 2905 % H
BEFORE; .
THE HONBLE MR. Jl.}STi CE;.. %
WRIT PETITION 1s:0.137o i-<32~'kk200*7 rL!;:;__s,_33*rc1
_ _ _ u _ _-an
SM 3 K NARA_Y:%.!§A. .
SON OF’ POMIé_+;CI7iU, ., ._ ;,
AGED ABOUT’ YEARS-.’jJ«~–..V% ” V.
R/AT NG.1?8, CF:()SS, ‘ ..
mm MAIN, .r§13THA;;z=.NA{;AR,
LALITHADRIPUEEAW E-“«’Z)%S’f»’_ . —
MYSORFE’ ” _
‘ PE’I’I’f’IONER
_ (3y«:i§x¥i {if 3 N}xI:c:.A_z_s;p. MANZTULH N KLILKARNI, ADV )
Du :
___.,-.. ,
‘I’H§;.”DIvIS@’=:§xL CGNTROLLER
KAR:\:A’mKA” STATE ROAB
. ?_ ‘ ‘ ._’FRANSPO:RT CORPORATIGN
nzvsom EIWSIGR
A “«.”B:IYSi3_RE
RESPGNIDENT
….(3y Sri. : G A K GOWDA, ADV )
THIS ‘WRIT PETFFIGN IS FILED UNIDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF’ iNI}IA PRAYING TO
CALL FOR THE ERTIRE RECORDS OF THE CASE IN
REFERENCE NO. 261/2091 ON THE FILE (31? T35
that the petitioner was not enfitieé ts any
periad of servicx-3 rendered by (:1: ‘
temporary and accordingly, by dafeci_”1§’fvI)’_»’1
Annexmxe-“C”, rejected the’ ;{<éf«:renccn,_ }~Is3ifs;:<=5;._;'t'r=;i5'°writ"' '
petition.
2. Learlled coL111sc:fT’l..VVi’éi}_ (flees not
dispute the ‘the a large number
of filed
W.P.N}3′.186 a Division Bench of this
Court, b§’:;;’ds:§r ” 140-1985, held thus:
«Vthe reasons stated above,
VA petitions are allowed and a writ in
of mandamus shall issue to the
re$p<fiidcnt~Corp0rati0n directing it 1:0
j éozisidcr the case: of the petitioners for
absorption in the vacancies at' Conductors
H which occur herfiaftcr until all the
petitiansrs am absorberd in service. We
make it clear that persons who are already
absorbed. or appeintaé shall not stand
E/:~*<K
In the circumstances, the writ petition is"'4'7s:§}'it1fV:-3§1ii' M
merit and is accordixlgly, rejected.
KS