.. ,T_.BaVr1'ga1ore ~»~ 27.
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATA}§A AT BANGMORE
DATED THIS THE 2Nv DAY or FEBRUAR'£f;:'?;€}'.i0A4
PRESENT .$TTVMT
THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICT: A "
AND A
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.'s:gEENm*A$T.€i«_§}p§WDA.it A
M.F.A.No. 58()' 7"cV>'f'2?J(_}O$"{1'J:[A\[v):
BETWEEN:
Sri. B. Ma.1IiE:arj1;ifiét;' » _'
S/0. Sri:
Age :_3V}"*yei'§_rs', C)c:c.A__:"N_il,'--"
R/0. K0r.§di.ahaii1i,._"-ff] 4'
KQ.n_.da1"'ah a1ii::,Pos*t.,:
l\:I0lakéh;1'vT(:;1i:1k, . . _
Chitx--=adurg;:jD1s»tricij. _
" " Appellant
5{By_SnT{. Tsmha B; H. for
S1Ii;€'Sh..«1'v'I Latur, Adv.)
" . . ""i'hé«1\/fliT2i<:1..é1ging Director,
C. [B.M.T.C Division},
K; Road, Shanthi Nagar,
.. Respondent
–‘ Z7§(f3y Sri. D. Vijaykumar, Adv. for)
>i=>!4*°f=>I=
A»
1.
la.)
This MFA is filed U/s. 173(1) of MV Act against the
Judgment and award dated 09~O9~2005 passedj’-ini~..MVC
i\§0.253/2002 on the file of the V Add]. Hail
Unit, Bangalore, {SCCI-I-20}, dismissing the__€?§laine’Vj’iE?etit.ion
for Compensation.
This appeal coming on:”‘fo’1*’he«ari11é;_” at.
N. K. Patil J, delivered the fo1lowinga:”‘e ..
Juedfififiiafiodd This appeai d A impugned judgment and award in MVC
No.253 /20O2§~’on;_t”i1e ale;e£i’:the’:fi%?a’tAa_d:i; ‘MACT, Mayo Hall
Unit, thiereinafter referred to as
_
2. by its judgment and award,
dismissed the .e’laiH.1.._petition filed by the appellant. Being
agg1*i.eveq’»e!§3zA:”‘the impugned judgment and award, the
appellant’ ii-a’sv.pfesented this appeal.
pp p A1′ The brief facts of the case are:
it .’T.’I’hat on 9~10-01 at about 5.15 pm. on St.John’s
road, near BTS Bus-stop/Naga theatre, when the
A/~
we do not find any good ground to interfere with the said __
finding of fact recorded by Tribunal. The judgment
award passed by the Tribunal is weli considered one.”
Accordingly, the appeal is dismi4sse(i:”as “‘de\éQ’ici
merits. Ordered accordingly.
Mgn/bs*