Sri B R Venkatesh vs The Bangalore Development … on 18 October, 2010

I

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. 

DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCT0BE:R,jV2:OT120'     

BEFORE  

THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE  E1OHANjORE:"m§YA:.Tj

WRIT PETITION No; 18 6F'. 20.99 (EDA) 
BETWEEN :    I "  

B RVENKATESH  '-  ,
S/OEATEPRAMAKRISHNA 3 :

AGE 40 YEARS" _  " . I,
R/AT NO.358,-- KRISHNA EU~H.D1NG--._"-- A 
NAGAVARA  1vLAE1_\: ROAD  . ,
CVRAIVIAN    
BANGALORE.V5"-9:1__VV _, '- ~ _   PETITIONER
(BY SR}. K 
AND:' 4' 'M I

1 g ' THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
"  Am*HOR1Ty,. ..9Ai\TKEY ROAD
«_ KUMALRA PARK WEST
 "  T EAN(_;ALORE W 20.
 A' REP,EYf1TS COMMISSIONER.

2O  THEEEPUTY SECRETARY -- IV
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SANKEY ROAD, KUIVIARA PARK WEST

A' '  BANGALORE W 20. ...RESPON1)ENTs

 "(ET SR1. A M VIJAY, ADV}

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 228
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
QUASI-I ANN--D THE IMPUGNED ORDER/ENDORSEMENT/
INTIMATION LETTER DATED 22.11.2006 ISSUED BY THE

bk



4

3. Petition is opposed by filing statern'ent_V_ of

objections dt. 5.4.2010 inter alia contendingT..t'h'at'--s_i.n~ee' 

the petitioner did not enclose g to .th'e"-..:appl:icat1Or1" 

Annexure~A, an income certificate. issued"  the

Tahsildar, despite extendlilngepp sutficient_ 

was ineligible for allotment;p'»»:ea1i.d  income
certificate dt.  of the Tahsildar
being later  of  petitioner to
an  the allotment

was witl1d.ratwm,"':by. e1-'3 d0rser'n'ent: AnneXure--D, petitioner

made several represeritations and produced documents,

whereafter'4"the'Superintendent of Police, Special Task

.  Eo}ip:§,5»--."iBDlA3 ondvflbeivng directed held an enquiry and

   afreport. The petitioner having not filed the

app.lica'tio.n7 AI1l'1€Xt11'€---A by enclosing an income

   certificate issued by the Tahsildar, the application being

' incomplete. the subsequent certificate issued in the year

it  ""2007 would not enure to the benefit of the petitioner is

the respondents contention.

lei

6

for consideration afresh over the material p1aeed..by”the

petitioner and to pass orders thereon assviigniiig

reasons, findings and cono1’u–siAon’s, strictly}. in V’

accordance with law, in any event within a .}§erio.d”.tW:)_

months.

In.