Sri B S Prahlad vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 December, 2010

0
128
Karnataka High Court
Sri B S Prahlad vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 December, 2010
Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy
1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE

1.

DATED THIS THE 15"' DAY OF DECEMBER 

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE C 3 KUMARASAXNAOMAS'  .4'  
CRIMINAL. PETITION NO.23-E8fiTO4E,,:50.i'D'Vfj--.___  7

BETWEEN:

SRLB S PRAHLAD  _
S/O SR1 c SUBBA' SHETTY-~~ .  '
AGED ABOUT 48' YEARS  V  u

SMT.SUDHA  .
W/O SRI.C.'S_.PRA.FfLADH
AGED A.~B'ODT'~42 AYEARS7

°Es.OTH ARE'O.W.NE.;§SAA«OF..\ .

M'/.s_ EHARc;Awf:NDuS'u*R1Es
(As ON THE -DATE  THE COMPLAINT)

-- ~DAVAGADA'ROAD, CHALLEKERE

» A VDTST: cs»; ITRA__D_§J.RGA

..PETITIONERS

 = .:{:'EySE;z~:$1.~P KULKARNI, ADV)

" THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS F-"'.S.I

O" CHALLAKERE

NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS SPF'
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING
BANGALORE - 560 001

THE VYSYA BANK LTD.,
CHALLAKERE BRANCH
CHALLAKERE, CHITRADURGA Di$triCt

Q',



')
4...

REPTD. BY ITS MANAGER __
..,REsPONogE'I-ITS

(BY SRIIP M NAWAZ, ADDLSPF3 FOR R1)

THIS CRI..P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4s':>_"'OEj'FCODEF»
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYENG TO (1) Qi_:AsH._jTHE,Ei\IT:,RE~, 

PROCEEDINGS IN C.C. NO.18/2OO3VO"N" THE EII.EOFVJTHE--.3'MFC,
CHALLAKERE AS BEING UNNECESS'ARY,ANjD BEING. As'UsSE.i.iiO.E
PROCESS OF COURT FOR THE GROUNDSIAND REASOAIS STATED

IN THE PETITION, (II) V,AI.TERNA_TII./ELYI/PERMIT THE',
PETITIONERS AND THE RESPONDENTS HEREIN" TO*

COMPOUND/COMPROMISE THE SAID C.C.E\iQ.”I8,”2OG;3 ON THE
FILE OF THE JMFC, CHALLAE{_ER’E._ OR TO”S_EE THAT THE
PROCEEDINGS ARE DISPOSEDIV OEs–.ATV’rHIS STAGE WITHOUT
FURTHER PROSECUTIONOF’ THE PaET1T’i–.CiNAE’F1S IN THE MATTER.

THIS CRL..P IS COi«iIii§IGi OIxI_FOR”ORi:3.1E’R”S THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE _THiE_FOLLc)wI§N_<5s: . ' '

"gflfaORDER
Leagned CoII'iIse~!ifo.Ir4'rhe petitioners has filed a memo

dated' seeking permission to withdraw the

I 'critniinaii. Iv.4e"tI.I-Ion.

Z memo is taken on record and the memo
reads as foflows:

“The petitioners submit as under:

The above Criminal Petition was filed
before this i-£on’ble Court 12.05.2010 seeking
quashing of the entire proceedings in C.C.
No.18/2003 on the file of JMFC, Chattakere on
iegal grounds.

‘£1/’

3

This Hon’bie Court by its order dated
04.06.2010 issued notice to the respondents,
and an interim order of stay was granted»..on_4l’-._
the same day. ‘

As the Government has dec’id_edjV’rV.to
withdraw the CC. No.18/2003 pend’i’ng-jbefore*.V
JMFC, Chaliakere as per Se/C321of’-Cr..;P._C;,«.the’~’ .
petitions herein seek leave :_’of..-r’th’i.s -Hon’b!:e-._
Court to withdraw the above”p_etition_~_for thee”.
disposal before the Tv;’ia’i-..Court… The petil:.ioneHrs.r
have produced herewit’h,éopies of.tt:e.d:ec’isEons
of the State Governmenti-nv the said «regard:

Therefore;~_j’thel_ a’bo”ve’vviA’petition may
pleased be dismissed as’ :with’d~rawru’_. to enable

. the tate “ash C 0 to \:vl.t-.h’tf ra w/ com po U nd the
gC.C._ No-.V1_§3/’2%p0Q3.before JMFC, Challakere in
the interesti.of=just_ice__and equity.”

3.0=j1nifiew3§rt5s nmwno,thE Cflnfina|PeUfionis

as wi’t.*adrawn.

ii

JUDGE

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *