Sri B Veerakyathaiah Since Dead By … vs Sri Huliyappa Since Dead By His … on 10 February, 2009

regi stared siracauments 3.11 i.:he=i.r__ £a’s}::«3;’:\
the 3212;: was filed by the ‘ V

3, The de£”ez’m’5a.r;?;S :é::,;;锫.g§,:,it;AA HA1; tha
first inataxzczag ;aT:a£a:2:;§.a33:5S’+:’~. the
@xec1:z.tiQr:. cf :3v’;i%é:”‘**”‘i%t:eaa>r:%;*e;r the
;:__3:¢p@z%;jg ¢t,;é@.V#g ‘_ £223 1″ éeiendant
a:*§.:9.:;’:1;esi. wt,.;-Egg -:’j;§V:t’*«’..v;*eg :3.gi:ex*ed zrzartgage deeé.
in f3*=._r<::%3r Else' 333$. reqgzagteai thg
Cczuriz to' §2:;:&51:=::M it is aise cazztezzéed
ti;-a<:a;t,'%,,,;1;¥§~~. §£";'i?..8.:,354 m an izzaaimigsibla

daazxifsefzt ':':?r:éi1i:., *;~:f':.~,'~..15i::§:; mi xagistxatian arm: Eartha:

W__:§r::¥z;.f':<:g*s.'i;r;e:°2a$;&::i i:':i"2«:§.i'.V'=:;:fé.a3.iEz°:t;i..§:7$ mafia iaiiaé; in ftzifiii.

i;arm$"a§d €:;an§?3:..:1;§:1s stzgigulateé; in the

'- _':¢<;;':~;mg;.a-s'$i:+22:A: It :25; alga carztanfiaifi. that the 3"

s:i;a2a%,{:17$:f;;s:3f__é.::";r; is in gessessian cm the garoggexsty as a

TLL'*-«fieizant 35 the 1*" éeiagzdagtg In View Qf the

<°'/

-gfit”.

Kaznataka Land RefQ:m5 Act, the ; éa£%§§$fi:

cannat axeaute the dgefi cf xaaanveyanmg in f$v$ut–{

mi tha glaintiffs. it is alsa ganténééfi that mg i

viaw Qf §rehih1t:®n unéax fifia Efiag§fintafi;§fi°AQtg’

$&fan@aa§~1 gamma: exeaute a égfiumgntnifi-€a§§ur 3f
the §1aiBtiffs; Tfie 2?§=aa€an¢;at a:sa fiiea tha

written $:atement,, Ea figs afimfififiaaftfie sale fieed

executed hy f_,:;}11?§:::%;iff;§”§ i”:’: ‘;§:’;=z_m=.’g=¥;;: Sf the 3;”

figéendante QQQQ H$&§é?@%§ kg Egfi fiéfiiéd the execution
Qf agreemgnt: §fi §%§0fi§é§an§ém ;n favfiur 9f the
glaintiffis §3 thea§%ffi§§§n§gnt, Ea 315$ gcntendafi
tgat hg :§,n¢g i fiéaéS$;ry garty sinca he is omly
g.g::§g§§$j§§§g: £$é ;”‘§@£andant,

%”§Q B§$é§:Qfi fine abava giaafilngsf thfi failawing

q i§$nas”warg’ffiam&§.by the aria; cgurt:

=_’;} fihétfier the plaintiffi pzaves that the 1″
V’ ” defendant axacutefi $38.35;? payér agr t
“te gofiveg at 5311 the guit lané fiataa 1?”
§8~l9§é in fiavgur Qf plaintiff agreeing ta
recanvey the fiuit sehafile progafity.

§V

3}

%§

‘fiéfi

“Wh&tfier t§e défenant fiepl §r§v@s

§h&thar
anfmrca
againfit the fififénfiant?

fihether the 3?” defendan§ p;dvé$>§%a§ §@é
agreaxnanfi datefi 3.?–68-4 .19’~§ré” ami’ .€%.”.2;e ~

éated 1?~§$~1§fi4 are c&atam@mrafi&@us3éndx%
wantVcf”xggistxat$9n’and.’

inadissibie £¢x ‘ V
hence the uit cafin¢t be .§as&ég am the
sgmfi? m W_~_ g –, »
baths: the 1?” §§§afifl$a§*_§:sv$s that
‘ ._npt'”~ “§fa_3-.’f:;,l}.&fi the

piaintiff A _ b V V
e¢mdi$iQn$_ as .l&id7>§Qwn gim the alleged

agra§fien§?_.v ‘_ # -,

ééfarééiz-ii}: pgmras that ear:

fihafih I; ‘ ‘ _
v$§r:gagifi§<thgksuitwfiand ta 25$ defendant

Kha_ha5gtgkgn,t§e_$amg fin lea$a 33$ he 13

i$'§§$$&§s;anV¢§ he land an the fiata af
su;t,agva*§enaai£

that he

"V5h$a_im§r@va§ the suit lands at 1 great

;fi}

E::£:2$t,7»:ii:h pm; fiat fiaailities. arzfi antitlefi.

"~_*:$ £é4im§ur$mnt»

fihéthér tha fiéfififlfi diendant grfives that

,§e is not a necéssaxy parfiy ta the guit as
. E; is aniy a mmrtgagae mi
"ieasing the

thé suit lad

iands in favour 9f 15*'

dfifiéndnt?

Ta what raliefs tha §laint1ff entitlfid?

6/

the §ia1:°1%;3;’Ef is e:1i:;§.~5<:3;;e.~<S_.f l:::<;_
the agreement far regénvéygnfia ~

I , 59:: . _:'a;;':£: @3.,§":«*§§

5. In orfigx ta grava their xe$§eéfiivé*;

fiantemtifimg, fear wifinesses wage» exégifiéfi”-¢m ,

mhagf 53$? time yslaintifffi am :;a3.a.:;f.’:1::§i£:::s-~ Vi;%:+–:3;9:;’sa§.”:*::.T_A

uyan EX.§1 ta E65 Gm behalf éfi fine &e§énd§fi:$$_:wa%

fifififimfifitfi were marked as Ex.§;J§fi§ $2;* f§§’£r1ai
aaurt ¢Qn$:dgr1ng th%’,§ié§$§fii 3§# ,;n hy the
gaxtiesg grantad a é§3:é% Vi§ fg%§fifi 9f the
pi, a:3L:’1t:;ff$§

6.. and games
af the tr1ai a¢fif$} §§f§n§ént fi¢§1 iilefi an aypai
befcra the §fiV%lv§%fi§§,fl§§fi§§r in R A,fia.i§§f?&.

Aftex hear1ng_§x: ag

/’

The _ V Sgicl” 4_;fa1.§§§,*>=.e§a.3;. mfg ‘ helaxa,

ap;v4p$:’:a.;:?.¢fa;%;;;:’,;:§c§»;:« “:i;:.3.éa:iV by the apyeliant as 34%;:-zeazg

:;r@man§&d”§h$”fiafitéfi ta the trig; cant: ta cwmsiéer

Vfihé t&nafi$g{i$3§$ whiah was yenfiing beisra the

T:ibfi&&§,_ fheréfareg the xmttez wag rammed to

1:;r{::.;a’,;: jmm by the 2: AdmJ.::f.xz:%..”:. Judge, Tumsguz

Aftar remndq fihg aria: Qaurt

,§Qfi$§fi&r:ng that the tanamag appliaatiam filled by

&V

aha aiiegefi tenant was withéxawn by him; @§&éhaaé$;:<

2 «_ .

filad hefmre the Land Exibunal, Kbrafiagaia;

decraaé the gait by its §n§gment®an§,fiec:égVdt{35,

April 1Q§S. iailengimg t é’§nfig$$fit an&;fi§arée

c1t:3″‘i 3§;;ri}_ 1999, timza rggiéé
befmre the Givii Judgég”§um$ 3 in ?;%”$GJié3£9§.
The said aggeal iatgr on~¥:an%§§:E§Ifia the Smart
cf 2:: Afifila D;s§§i§§ J§§gé;xffi§§$i a§d renumbarad
as R.A.1é3;:_§§%: Judge after
hearing thé parfl@é§,%n§*#é§9n$:fiér1ng the eviéence
afifiucad by the gggtfiéé §%§ §an£irmefi the safigment
an§VdflQ§@$”§f flfieufifigi gear? by fiismissimg the
at§g.4:$§3; an 12″‘ actnzmz 23:35;

?,”§$i§gVag§$iev&Q by tag Qeneurrent iindimgs

§f fine C®uxfi’bé1Qw, fiha pxfisent secand aygeal :5

xfj’j.v:;?e;§; A.

g8,”T have bearé tha learned ccunfiai far the

‘ V s;§;;é;;a1;;:~.g%

v§v

3* The ieaxned. zzmimfiél fer the &§§51E3il:E;..;§._,’«?;ljf’f;i’§i’;;;7f’_”~’

cmntenés that aging: raszmnalg the triai.

1:-mt cgrzsifiey £35523 eviégnge let 5:; §ms.f_»;f}t1-12¢’_§ar*::’:_§$,,_

waceraing ta him; both the §§§rts’§i§ net éfinsifififi
the 33$: being 3.2: umtegismrefip 3gr&emé:f:t fig: re-
éanvayanca sax: wh&nT theia fig .fi®J fifiCit$l xnj the
sale fleet: m?§E’1.’¥i_$il§fif%””v>.’i’nV” ;:_egi’i;’:;~2§5.’~…’j_t:-.2» the re-
gamreging t?:°:&§”-_;f,:>1m;5wf;’:;Te_:::’3.:.’g”., £31434′ x_Si:i’%.;——~”f§,3.’&51 by the
§ia:nt:ff5 fihafiédfl h&v f§§éfi Efiigmissfifi as mat
” ,v–». —- a vg. 2 , ‘._ ~3 aw

main:ainab;e,. §a.:u:th$r_%§ntenas that the firfit
§§§e;;a:a Smart ha¥§&§:fi¢£’confiiagréé-the éviéenae
afid th§'”§Q§umfitS V§E0d&ced by the partiegf

raqgésgs $h:3 $¢uzt ES set aaide the Jufigent and

§&Qffi§ ¢f”§fi§.§fiW&E éyyéllata Gfiart. Theréfare,

V} ae_re§§e$t$’thé Caurt ta gllmw aha aggeai,

1:3, “:«1’a~a:i.::g ‘zzzaarai tam caunm; far: ‘him

. a§§e§:&nts; this Quart ages mat see any

Tggfigtantial gaastiens ci iaw a:1$e3 in this agpeai

,fér the icilawing reasona:

6%

it is ma: :2: Ciisyute that at the §V:a:V.::>§7’f~:.:T.

instarzrza, ma aggeiiant has disyuteaf tha e;1::z:§§:c’;2fir;;;g:*;1I’

23% agrmrmn: Sf re–c@::v§:gan$e :3Et,1?g8z.1§6§_:;=. ‘=TE::%:.

in the 133:3: yart at? the written I$taA?;§aj3:&:1ii ‘1″;e 1%.aS __f

admgttmf the executim mi t,2’;«3 agf1:_eementV.v-‘ms’ ‘re?- ”

aaammyazaavak Egwevexg he ffT.§.aS”v’vA’f::’E£$;:i7″i1_,’:3~&~fiV.”‘ :*8¢.”5%%¢’E.¢1?”;%
the 0:’ re~cQnveyanc%§”‘~%..0n tha
plaintiffs gzezamaintgg a__ _.~’.éf* 7_-Jkfizanfiitiafina
stipigiataui in it 3.3
clear that in 5:153 has azarzmd.
the exeautififiw §% _%%§e§$§$t’1£§ rawaenvay :33
yrargfirty f b:1: 1;:; 1.21% ” §reatE: ‘:23 afizzzt the
ezgezztzztiarz. : :>f rewconveyanae anai

ha iifgas-;re’§1:s5E”ti’ *t.¢;r:= exééiite the mm’ mm the gmsunzxi.

‘that ‘a:;::-fig$1.335;-:;:;kz~: %% has failed in adzzesse ta the

?…t;é;r::%;$ 3.§::::i a:::2r§;;i’;5:f.£:21s asf the a§£ t ta 333*

‘ciafifieg’ if .;1′.__’*§éaZi,iy thaxzsa was :13 agreemfiniz. ta ::e~–

‘. ‘i’.’;’?.g$:’Z7}’4.锑°L’-‘='”:_ ‘i::Zr_1fe§.::a was mar» zmaegfiity gear the cjgienfiantwl

that the giaintzff has Cfiiifiifitfitfi, 3;

§§%fl
§1a:ntiffi$ fiuit cgnnmt be fififififififi he1ds n%fl§&té$f

as fa: as the Enagmfimtatian hat $3 §§§§é:fla;*z§% .}

ieaxnad gaunsei far the a§§e1;a§ts* dusimg tha
_ _ V _ ,V,_¢fl
cmuxfie 9: argment? fiairig éonaefied that Sufihgéfits
r AV” . .m_v r. “-_ ,3
v9 _ _ I.. ; Aw’ R , “”

age mat apgllcasle t$ thm*Eaats.and,c;zaum5tan¢e$

of tha case since ifi i$ a Q§3g:@£1réf§§§fi%yanae.
12¢ There£9:¢} §§éV§%;g_§@§fi§ &s~§é cQn$ifier&§

in this agyeai _:§}J%fiet§é§ §§§ €§§§e;;afits havm

yrfivafi tha §%%a§fi ¢¢%$i§§§§ bgwifie glainfiiffg ta

reject the ‘§:aya£,’§f”r§hé’ giaintiffg. But

unfartunatglgf fimé *a§§§i1an:s have ngt lat in

@vid§$a& “t§f=§@gv@ ibat tha yiaintiffs have

$1

the gage Qf the tenancy 1$$ue§

View af tfie withérawai af tha Farm ‘§a;§f,fii1e¢3
unflfig the gxvisicns ai the Karné§axa@L#n§ Ref¢y$#,_?

ggti the suit mi tha plaintiffis nag bfififi fi駣aéd

ané, the samfl has bean u§hei$bf$yV that agygiiata
flmurt by xa~a§§reciat:ngv§hgpavgéfinmfiyé Therefare;
this Saurt fines nmfi see any substafitfiai qyesticm

Qf law arises ,ié ,tni§, agpail *fihether the

yiaintiffs §gy%>§$§§§§%¢§ g’figéafigwaf terms Qf the
agreament fig fi9§ igI§»q§é§$:Q§ma£ fag: and mat a
fiegtimn Qf §a§,Mv

_ 13* xfi the $$$fiifi, t$e ayyaal is fi:3m1$$efii

f

Sd/-

Judge

éftex rema§égifi