IN THE HIGH COURT op' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE Dated the 19*' day of November 2010 :BEFORE: fa HONBLE MRJUSTICE : V.JAGANNAfifIjii£V§Nf'4.."~..-. K WRIT PETITION Nos. 19101-105 / 20 BETWEEN : 1. Sri Bhadraiah.K., ' '~ , 2 S / 0 Late Kempegowda; Aged a"o_o1it 49 ye'a;rs. ; Working as Bill Co11ectoT~"oum~C'leTk; ' Hunasemaranahalli Grarha Panchay-at,t ' ' Ramanagara Taluk 8: I)is*.:7iVct.. V"-._ i ' - 2. Sri P.Rajesh, '' 'A t' * _ S / o Puttaswamy,H_A'ge_d a,boj1t--'Z1~2. Bill Collector, Mylahaggakanahalii Gram a" Pafoch ayht, Kasaba V H--o'o1.i. Cha.rin_'a,patn.a Ho_b.1i.' Ramanagara District. 3. ism.B.aevar1.asiad1a1a1:. ' S;/o*Late Aged about 48 years. Worlgiiig as_Bil1 Coljectorwcumwclerk, 1 . .1 Suggariahalii Grafiia Panchayat, Ramanagara Tao'-.uk <31 District. .A V' as Vvo'vCh.eij;nappa, Aged about 42 years, Wo'T1gi'11,g"as Bil} Co1lector--cum--C1erk, Belagumba Grama Panchayat, Rariianagara Taluk & District. V Sn' ShivaramegoWda.S., S/ o Siddaiah, Aged about 39 years, Working as Bill Col1ector--cum--C1erk, Nagavara Panchayat, Channapatna Taluk, Rarnanagara District. . . .Petitio1'1e1's [ By Sri A.Nagarajappa, Advocate for Sri A.Nagarajappa 81 Associates. } AND: The State of Karnataka, rep. by its Secretary, Rural Development 8: Panchayath Raj Department,' . -- '. '2 Karnataka Govemment Secretariat, 3 V' ' Multistoried Building, Dr.A1nbedkar Veedhi, __ Bangalore--56O 001. 5 = --- ( By Sri Jagadeesh Mufldargi, ll: 2 Writ Petitions filed pray_i_nug..to*.direct' respondent to consider the represen_t_a't.ion.'lAnneXure~C and to dispose of thepusame quota for Bill Collector of §~vG'ran1a l?_aneh.ayatli"ll.out_'___of direct recruitment quota of tolthep'ost.,.§f..P1::.()slvbypromotion, and to direct the 1"t'3$]'QV01'l"t?l.§':1"1'l;::I:,Cv.) objection of the petitioners datec?!._l1 tiled to the draft C <31 R Rules published dated TE} etc; _These petitions coming on for preliminary hearing in '~ this court made the following : ORDER
only relief sought in these petitions by the
p€ti»t.i¢.ti\€I’S is to direct the respondent to consider the
Vrepjresentation as well as the objections to the draft C 8:
l Rules of the Rural Development 8: Panchayath Raj
Department. %
-Q
2. The submission of the petitioners’ counsel is that
the petitioners, being the employees of the ‘jG»rama
Panchayath Working as Bill Collectors
decades, want a separate quota for v_:f)yV
way of promotion to the7__v post}
Development Officer out<'o.f_ 675/£:,_ 'Vrese1r.Ve.j_p: for
recruits and by setting for of Bill
Collections. Therefore,_tl'ie is made by the
petitioners' counsel as well as
the to the draft C 8: R
Rules' be to
3. thin submission made and the
nature and the learned Government
__for the-..respond€nt-State also submitting that
sthevtpreprleysentation/objections would be considered in
.acc’ordanc§; 5;with law, if not considered already, this
petition. is, therefore, disposed of with the following
V’ ‘ — iiireactionz
The respondent-State is directed to consider the
representation as well as the objections if any filed by
the petitioners as per Annexures–C and E in respect of
%’
.I
the petitioners’ prayer for allotting certain quota or
percentage to the Bill Collectors to the_4…p~o_et.’ of
Panchayath Development Officer. If the
are not already considered, th,e.y__shailt”be:’_’:Vcohsidered”»_
within a period of three month§s.&fro_:rr1~’tthe~.date
of a copy of this order and’t§_t”aha1IAbe_in with L’
law.