IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CWJC No.10668 of 2011
Sri Brijnandan Prasad
Versus
Sri Uchit Singh
-----------
02. 08.07.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
This writ application has been filed against the
order dated 27.05.2011 passed by Subordinate Judge
Ist, Patna in Title Suit No.589 of 1990 whereby the
learned Court below rejected the petitioner’s application
as contained in Annexure 4 whereby prayer was made
to reject the affidavit, i.e., examination-in-Chief of
P.W.4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted
that in fact the examination-in-Chief of P.W.4 is
irrelevant and cannot be considered. All these points
are available to the petition at the time of final hearing
of the suit and not at this stage.
It appears that the learned Court below noted
the submissions of the learned counsels at length and
thereafter rejected the application. By the impugned
order, in my opinion, no injustice has been caused to
any party, so, it is not the case where supervisory
jurisdiction under Article 227 is required to be
exercised. Thus, this writ application is dismissed.
Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)