IN THE HIGH couacr or KARNATAKA AT
DATED 11-us THE 107" DAYOF'MA'§CVH;: 2Q6'B _";_
BEFORE =
THE HON'BLE MR. JusncEA;M, VENU:(3DRA{éA"'$Gw'fiA A
Mlsceisaneeus Hm. Ap!.:ezeV!:A':'é--e;?.3-2 GE (Mm
sin. c. ANJANAPRA.
s/o CHANNAIFW,'
AGED ABOEJT savanna;
RJAT 140.121, PAPAN§~:A tétltnaom.
NEHRU ROAD-,~ em GUDDAUHALLI,;
MYS!J!-'IE amp, §ItE@GA!_;Q-RE~O26; A
_ k & % APPELLANT
(av sa::1_. 'aamacmmoagf 'R."'NAIK, ADV.)
A-RUL
' S/'G. :':'?r-'R'I'.:~.,5'i. .k'TrS'IEI"'r1',
' "' TXM/s'iwFANI TRAVELS,
' «N029. 3.'i'«*'i'. STREET. ULSGGR,
BANGALGRE-560 ooe.
2; me dnzeum. INSURANCE comwav Lm,
nanzx, SARVAMANGALA COMPLEX,
AA HOSUR MAIN ROAD, ADUGODI,
" -- BANGALORE-560 030.
BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. N.V. POONACHE, ADV. FOR R2)
N
This Appeal is filed under Section 173$) raw Act
against the judgment and ewerdeedeted .i’?’;i;2’_fif)? passed
In ni’v’C fio.538i’2G”6 on the nie: afthe 5631*’;-‘.’ddi .3;i:’;;.-:3 X…
Henher t-‘.m…, Metro-;.-oiitep e1,’«.:IA”.-:.a.nt,;s_ii_e.’:-.r’_»v§~.Qi;H;;)if
pertiy eiiowing the claim’ petition “for corn,pen’s”etion an
‘This appeei cornihine “and?
VENUGOPALA’ GOWDQh tie
jcieim petition before the
tribunal, ‘.Aciejirnin_pd’dcorinuensetioin from the respondents for
the injuries him in a motor vehicle accident,
uu§fi’Ich..hae piece on 22.12.2004. Considering the
record, the tribune; hes eiiowed the claim
“-i:’:ieti’t:Eer:..V’_in.i’-part, awarding m..1,12,50G;= with intere-=….
iieissatistied with the amount awarded, he has flied’ this
.. Veppeai seeking enhancement.
2. Heard iearneo’ counsei ppearina on both sides
and perused the impugned judgment and award.
\
X
3. Learned counsel for the appellant
the impugned award made by thetrlburlel’l’e’Thot’.’ju’et and ‘ .
reasonable. Learned counsel po%«ntedt ovuththethtiae
has committed error In takln%§w..the Apercenptege5..of*~dleebllltvL’
at 10… as age!-e medleel!..–.e’ ésieh.-:. |.._m-rned
counsel point’o’ out “theta f.t_1oV:lewe”d f*r tne loss
suffered during the that the award
amount llhoes of amenltles’ ls
meager. 1: pelleted out that there is no
award toweVrde’:’fe.ttentleTntcheroes.
_ , 4. l”.’ea:’rn’ed’~ covunsel for the 2″” respondent Insurance
p ¢o:mpenv..refotlno”‘the contentions of the learned counsel
contended that Ex.R1 shows that there
\,I the eepellent end hence the
5. Conslderlng the rlval contentions and on perusal
-e
the rem-rd the hole: 1′ r eeheideretleh Le, “whethe: the
Liners is raermanent disabtiit” o
appellant entitled to any additional
amount?”
taken place and the appallantshas suflereti tlaiellllnjuriest
The appellant, as could facord, has
suffered the foiiowinoAV:inj-axles;
(1) um-.;.».%ceal at lower 3″‘ oi’ the left
A ::%fi’teb§a; a
as at 1i;f;”t*flro heao’ oaicjin 3″‘~’;
A cutanuryllaa fore head;
(4l)ax gaunt inj.ui*y””lVleft chest
Ithlfasion injury over the left leg and left
it .:l:si:oulder.
has treated tits appellant and according to him,
n.- 5 -1501. I
I .uz.’ru. an ‘rifinau fin
V. _eiiidanca, tribunai has taken the disability at 16%. There is
no material enabling the tribunal to reduce the percentage
of the disability as against medical evidence, which
appears to be consistent and is ‘supported by the
G’ ;us
6. There is now, nosd4lsputei_tiiat ths;1i.a:¢citiant.”ihatiwi?
azttot-ti 2 months. Hence
A ….. ‘-1. , _…_ LI.’ _……..ll…..|. 1., ….
uocumunt. nem: , mu uppumml. I: emu
the difference amount towards i:he>_ioss_.’of”ft§t;.ire:: >
CRDGCWY.
7. As could be seen from” the ‘r.er:crd, vtiheiitrliounialtvheei *
not awarded any surn Sass aufferedvvvfdurino the
period of treetmentv. (goineltieriney nature of injuries
sostained, the app-Veii–a:.’stfi “as aioetv itnzotne .or a-bee… 2
moflthst ..l:-‘4r4’V’=*i_”‘Vi.¢”‘Vi5’EVV-:””‘i’:’ience, he ‘nae
awarded n.nd-e?.;_the amount awarded under
the -iJjea__n.A’AioesVoi;’an1enitl.ee’ is on the lower side. Tribunal
has not1:ewarded..’A’e:n§i:Su:m towards attendant charoes,
though the aVpVne’i’Iant was an inpatient and was out of work
ettendeet ehereee will have _o
F
ii .. giviconsidering the “record, I deem it just and
in addition t-
(L) L-ee of future earning on account of 7,920/-
permanent disability. ‘
K
/3
!
, 41″intim§t!oh:i’ta__the appeiiant in the tribuhai, within 3 man
(ii) Loss of amenities and enjoyment of life:
(ill) Attendant chargas (2 montnsyw isgmid ” A
(iv) Loss of earning during the périodii ” _ _ A g .
of treatment (2 months) . 6′,fi’c’ifi;.«’.. ‘
in the resuit, éyfiéfuiaéiiawed in part and
impugned driimj is to the amount
awarded€.bs;” is awarded which
shaii,i.cadrr_yf iciii-h,fi’:t>m the data of petition till
the irdatd We 2″‘ respondent insurance
c-mper:hy,_whidghddihgs fixed with the liability by the
= costs.
‘ill.-“J
H V ‘3f’i*i’E ii l”.’I’Ii’EcLuu t
i
:2.
-I
0:
E:
f!’
:r
an
:i
c:
E&
:3
ii
an
:’E
5!
:
KSJ/-