Posted On by &filed under High Court, Karnataka High Court.


Karnataka High Court
Sri C Ashok vs State Of Karnataka on 3 August, 2010
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri
BETWEEN:

1 .

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 3" DAY OF AUGUST, 
BEFORE RENEE.'
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ASHQK .B4.&HE"NV{Sfi'I:Tf{VLf'RV§.  E

WRIT PETITION No.I8O38 /:201TjR(iB§REE.iI§"}I.' 1   
*AND wan' PE'rITION;_§u:Q§. 18'128'«130;z"2E0;_q

_  Vida order.
SRI C ASHOK  ITd:.a16.a.R2o1o
S/O CHIKKANNA _ ._ ;

AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS  '

SMT. BHARA"T"H1'  . "   . 
W/OSURES|:i'"'E;1.I_.'  a  
AGED ABOUT.43zi,_Y'EA'R$.__   I

SR1 N%VS1,D1DA:R'RA,_ ., 
S/O NINGAA'PPA  _  I
AGED'=..AB--OUT 4vS':'Y_EAA.R"S.__ ' '

SMT. SIDRAAMAKKAIV.' »-- .'
w/O.yARA'DARRA.--- "
AGED ABOUT'  YEARS

E  ARE R:/'O.VCHIKKABYALADAKERE

 "HQ'SI.A:DiJ.RvGA__TALUK
._CHI%TRAD~_U__R'GA' DISTRICT

REIT T: I O R  R v:

 (BY SR1 K.R. RAMESH, ADVOCATE)

  

A  OF KARNATAKA

REP. BY ITS SECRETARY

'''DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT

& PANCHAYAT RAJ
M S BUILDING, BANGALORE

 '*'.InE;ex 



'-5

THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER
KARNATAKA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION
BANGALOREMOI

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT
CHITRADURGA   

THE RETURNING OFFICE AND TH ETSTA'THS'ILOHA'R:T"   

HOSADURGA TALUK  _ 
HOSADURGA I  
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT

THE CHIKKABYALADAKERE CSIRATM !T??_A..[u\vJ'C.§f1AYATAA 

REP. BY ITS SECRETARY '-
CHIKKABYALADAKERE

HOSADURGA T.A'LL__}K   - 
CHITRADURGA     

SRI UMESH 
S/O   \_  _
A<3EO,'ABOUTj~3_S YEARS'~.,_

SMT. RATH--NAm{1A'I.TjV*».RT'  
W/O vAR'AOARRA_ , 
A<3E_D_ABOu~T,_,35YEARS '

'  SM: Rs LQRAM
A "W0 R/WESHYT.
  A';-:.ED .A'B_O'LJ'T. YEARS

SR.ITVSITARA'.MAIAH
S/O" RANGAPPA

 AGED' ABOUT 42 YEARS

 INDRAMMA

W/O SIDDAPPA

 __AiGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

RESPONDENT 6 TO 10 ARE

R/O CHIKKABYALADAKERE

HOSADURGA TALUK
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT RESPOf\§s{)’1ES§\|”f”S

(BY SR1 R DEVDAS, AGA}

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTI_Cfl”L–ES:.Z;’2t4}
227 OE THE CONSTITUTION OE Ii\JDIA_,PR.AYIN_’G T’Oi.SET ASEEIE-. ‘

THE ELECTION OF THE RESPONDENTS; 6 TO’ 9 ‘AS-I’ME:NIIE_RS_O’:I*
CHIKKABYALADAKERE GRAM PANCHAYAT C_U~NST’ITt;’-Ei\éCY~ II:i;>.’Ois’
CHIKKABYALADAKERE GRAM PANCHAYAI, IIOSAIIIIRSA

A i_:I.§) re’; ‘ = I

“E.

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT IN THE EEECTION HELD,

AND ETC.

THIS WRIT PETITION ‘COMIIIIIONiI;éIjR..IORDE’iiS”TIiIS [.’f>ii\Y.
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING__: I. ”

The petitiOriers’5si_rj’.e fi.J.ed~..’a To-enno requesting that was

Case be dism.is.sed».a_s i.Nith_dr.a’v»:_Ij’. ‘?h.eVVv_rnemO is taken On i’€f{i(}i”If,§.

2. Onx’.2i..7.V2Oi(3..’T’the~C_a’S.e’was posted for the 5*” time Ia;
Compiianceof offifie’ O.bVj’VeCt’i,ons’}TV One week’s time was granteci to
,;iom_Diy offiv’Ce'””O*bjeCtiOns, but by imposing a Cost Of’

there was no representation its:

TT’2….vpetitionefs thOdg.Vhin:;the matter was passed over and Caiied e::mI

_ I . {W ice.

This petition is dismissed as withdrawn, but D;

it Confi-r’ming the imposition of the Cost of Rs.1,0_DO/~ payabie to

T”r_nth’e ‘Advocates Welfare Fund’, vide this Court’s Order, datearf

flBH.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

8 queries in 0.105 seconds.