Sri C Sudhakar vs The Hon"Ble The Chief Justice on 14 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court

Karnataka High Court

Sri C Sudhakar vs The Hon”Ble The Chief Justice on 14 December, 2010

Author: V.Jagannathan

 

us: THE men coum or KARNATAKA AT  ' v 
Dated: 'I'}rm' the 148*' day of»IDe.<m  A     'V ' 

BEFORE'

THE HONBLE Iv!CR.JU£é'I_'ICE v; 

SRIKHAI-IADEVAI&_H ._    2 
AGED A39 ':45  a10,LAfrE F{~.'1I.AIAH.

sax  :3. "  '
AGED AFSOIJT 4-:2   .5
3/ 9 gm.  'W.-,. .

  

5:331;  am RAMESH PATEL.
321%. R amewﬁahg

. -- AGED  YEARS,

..  310 K' s 

% ~ la
  _ 1§sa:7g::*£s'2=-'§(:~;r'1* 5; mass, 310 Ruzmaxaa.

" 29."

22.

51:1. mrrwnm,

 sxi 
 .  50 YEAR9, 5] 0 PANCHAIAH.

mi 1:: <3 PUR1%E3II.
1.  AGED ABOUT as mass, 3/ o :3 H aopazaowm.

.  321v NAGARAJA,

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, .'?:]O S VEERAPPA.

SKI SURESII,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
8] O BO  GOWDA.

SR1 B N HARSHATH,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 8/O [ATE B NARAYAHA.

 



 

25'

26.

28.

29.

3
SR1 P KUHAR,

AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, szo LATE K PAPAIAI-L. V  j f  _

SR1 SYED  .

AGED ABOUT 33 mass,

3,? O SYED RAHAMATULIAH.
SR! 1' 8 SHASHIDHAR,

AGED ABOUT 45 mans, 
sxo T N snmmm smsm

am? RAMACHANDRA,  

AGEDABOUT 42 mans, 5"/ '<:a.__  

sun' crzrrrm 

AGED Aaotrr 43  

sax z¢x.1a.caa_nIs;i"ItU&:g;  -  "
ASEB  32  am 

'$121 L1; 

A4329  $10 somma.
sRi'G.RAc3IiU,  " 

. % -AGED  37 

~  $10 mTE"GTJRFIlﬁ'URTHYACEiAR.

% * 32.
  T. 5:339 'm_=}c}gJ'r +3 mans. W/O N RAGHU.

.' :%3: ." 

 aivnranurznnnz.

31-2': 'f§£'j_3..i?EVANA3R)I}APPA.
A.f3ED«-ABOUT 44 YEARS,

" .s:~=;J LATE at R snmnm.

'  E35.

36.

sh: B NATARAJ,

 AGED ABOUT 45 mama, ezo BEERAIAH.

SE! C SHWARAH.
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 3/0 CHOWDAFPA.

SKI SRIHARI.
AGEXJ ABOUT 3'? YEARS,
SIG LATE V  IYEHGAR G R.



 Er-.

 

Q

37. am RAHAHZATULLA,    
AGED ABOUT 34'1"EAR8, s;o M D PEER._.--a_ "    '

33. smmﬁ ,    
AGED Azaotrr 43 mama, s1f:z'Cii3tNna.1A_a._  _ V

39. am mrcsmmrm mwm K Er, .
AGED AEQUTMYEA33,  
310 LATE NANJUNDEV   V

40. SRIRRBDRAIAH.   '
AGED ABOUT -:3  em 
ALL THE PE1'ITIONERﬁI.vTQ'4Q KKK. " .
wommm A3 amass DIVESEDNAESISTANTS,
mm: c:;<U:§'r cm  -  "

     
   - ' _   ...PETZ'i'IONER3

_ .   G f}ﬁ4_&€:AVAK, nnvncnm.)

x mm H~'§Iw".®LE THE CHIEF wanes,
' a_za;Ic3~g coulrrop KARNATAKA,
ax-usuamnxan vzzsnm,

  _ "--13AX(§g$1'.'{}RE~56G 001.

" . 2:' Tf':;E'jKfGE caum' or KARHATAKA,

g:*$"'?'°r-lP\5"2.""',.~3"

-

.. BY THE REGISTRAR GENERAL.
Esm T snrvmmnm,
am mm B,
SR1 T HAHALINGAIAH.

sm REVATHI as,
am B sum
syrr nmmmmm 21 J,
am SUKARYA H.

am vmvnvmm H K,
am NANDINI mo J V,

N-5 ha’ .wt’s.u’ ta no no la?
*4′ 9*’ ‘*3 an :4 9 5″: .5’-‘ .6 $3′ .3 365 f’-3 E?» 5 2-‘: :2 331 it: 1::

use
5″

-5.-r-Lu
P99

4:-

3*’

am’ SAHPOORHAJ KARIsHE’I”iY,

SET G S ROCIPASHREE,

am’ smuzm 3,

SHIT R CKA.NDR.I’£KALA.

am KS MANGALA, V

am H R

am oovnmanmv R, %

sax HALANAIK 0, 3. V ~ _
sm
szarr BEA-355311 K.-“‘ ‘ ‘ . VV ”
Sm VL ” 1 V

ask: g A

$31 ‘;*3ATHI8’.’3f’riAI£€.
sRI”Kg5RI3N£¢.K:§RA’*K E%.

. — .5331 Mémquzzxn-I°s. ”
38: c,

V * V N.

” SR1 ﬁP RATHOI),
.’ ~ am’ JSANDHYA,

Em H nacmsaxmn,

.” 4% am’ K vmammxsmn,
sax an-31> AKIL ALI.

SR1 SYED HADEEM-«UR-REIiAHAN,

SR1 VABUDHA N,

Sm VASANITI NAIK,

EMT VEEFIA G B ,

SR1 DORESWAHY A N,

8131 SIIDDANAGOWSA NAGESHAPPA ANAJL

45.

46.
4?.

SET RAJIIH K P’,

SR1 BALAPPA ‘U’ EETAGERI.
SHT RAMAEAI NAIK,

SHIT THEJASWINI 3 N,

33113593013,

SR1 RAMESH P C.

8111′!’ SULOCHAKA,
SKI M SHIVAKUHAR,
SE1′ SINDU MOLU,

sax smnmmemsﬁwnn ” – .. A

sum smmmm
aura Ic SH.RUTm,.~- _ jj ‘ V
smvnmwgﬁmm, : =

%
am 2: LE ” ¢ E’
surmaadnaa

1. ‘SET 3’ ‘myhmni;

3 BHARA*:’¥:,’

231:: Q agunmsvamm,

am’ Raxfmam Ii P,
” am v”iIAmsHRE3,

“agrv Imrsammkrnv,

am N 1′ REVAHKA aowm,
3221 menu as H,

33!?!’ B P REKHA,

SET 31 R PRASANNA KUIEARI,
SM’? H 3 PREETHI,

SR1′. K R’ SURESHA,

SR1 R 3 CHANDRA,

SRIA R SRENATPL

was an
.a~.u~£s-a$?–°?:’§.”~«’>’3’a’-:’:3~’a%E

SRI D BADARINATH RAG.

sax MANJUNATH BHAT,

3121 K V samsa mom,

am I-EALIJWALA BHARAMA spam,
am U mnmsa, 4
sm PRAKABH 2′, ‘
am’ SMITHA K,

Sm KAVITHA 8,

SR1 ammnan 3,

ERIE 3

am SHREEI€IVA3}§’,– T ._ _ _ _
smmmwm D s.,,__ A
Sm’ ‘9’» ”

3RI”MALL}1vI’ATHAAhEUCi;3LLGAON,

, % 31:1 31:1′-aaigxipain S MQWJLLI,
.

sm sigma 23 nmnsmxnx.

A ” K R»
* SR1 sﬁmsm.

% 3:21 m=s;§:;~EsHA K 9,

“am SUNIANDA c,

4% sm yasnonm B,
SR1 smmu Nammnss smvxmm,

KHV mAVAJ TEGGINAHARI,

. SR1 REHUKARADHYA 3 N,

SR1 A L8.X’AKOP}?A,,

. SM’? PREHA S JADIMATH,
. SHIT SAROJA C M,

SRI VEERABHADRAGOUD PATEL,

V x ‘ 127.

105.

106.

107.

308.

109.
111},

111.

112.

113.

114.

115.

116.

I17.”

<,8§€lT u % '

I13.

119.

129.’

_ V” ’12:.

V T123.

“125.

126:

129.

130.

am: azznm R <3,
SR3 SURESH MURKAL,

SR1 RAMANJhNEYA H,

3311'!' MAHIBOOBI.

SR1 DAKBKINALKURTHY C,
an: mourmsa M,
am xmunszsmcumn >
an: snmxvasa V’ ‘ ”

snrr REKHA M.’ _
amrrns aavrrrm, V
snrr as i;*I>,§:cH:;It11Er§.;

M % ”

M ‘
em R ”

sax K R’ 5ﬂ&$§2§HWARAPPA,

9 3 PADMAVATHY,
” G mo,
“‘s§§1%r..vIg1AYA1.axcsHna1 Gumumm,
__3Ln €xAvn*rIA EANDI,
am: FRASHAMHI,

$31’: MANJUIA GU A HUBBALLI,
am <3 IAKSHHAHMA,

snmr soumm,

SET A T .A.PARRﬁ,

RESPOHDEIITS AT SL.Ho.3 TO 130

ARE ALL HAJOR8, ALL ARE WORKEVG AS
FIRST DIVISION ASSISTAHTS,

HIGH {ZDURT OF KARNATAKA,

Bu°sNGALORE~5é0 W1.

RESFQIVDENTS

( BYBASAVAPRABHU S PATEL, Sr. COUNSEL FOR R-1 & 3.
SR! 3 V PRAKASI-I, ADV. FOR 12-94, 96, 106, 121.
SR1 KARADIGUDDA N ll, ADV. FOR R-98, 99, 101,
104, I10&lll.)

THESE WRIT PETITIONS FEED pmvmc V
THE PROVISO as svaamrman AT SL.NQ,i§5V..VvU*2§DER-

ccwuss No.4 xomzramma m'”mE« 19:?

RECRUITMENT m TI-IE swan OF,FH'”;Ei’i.’. ?Div1s1._1j1c1=: ‘—-2 2:;o9 _.z§<1+,.:;'9.7.oi9,"'%

CALLED Tm: HIGH comm' {cGmptr1é:i$""c§P
smvxcn: & RECRUYPMENT] 2009
ASPER ANN-A, ETC. 7 '

m W;§'.Hqu.Ai 1 ?'–'§?:_:f'iI?§ﬁ"? _{:"'29; 0:

1. ,– K sm1§mf.m<m ' , s
.. man ABo1_If:§-_§ YEARS, 510 sam KELIPAIAH.

.A éﬂnkrmm,

" V _ mED'maam 33 YEARS,

%. 3-; R mmnnvmm.

xja’ ﬂé;KIAPPA sax/rw,
.A<3:ED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
s.;_e:: am AHNAPPA samw.

»¢_. " M S VEERABHADRAJAH,

" AGEE AQOUT 54 YEARS, $10 SR1 BKNANNA.

95. U Jnvaxmaaa,

AGED ABOUT 43 YEAR3,
S} O SR1 U VENKA ACHARYA.

6. EAJEN}3RA S TIIASUL,
AGED ABGUT 43 YEARS,
810 SR1 DRUVA TILGUL.

M LINGARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, SIG LATE MAIJAIAH.

VYHANEKMANTHRAJU,

AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 31:: 3231 YELLAIAH.

ANJANEYA REDEY,

AGED ABOUT 5’7 YEARS, 31:) 83; GOPAL’ ~

JAYAPRABHU D,

AGED mom so YEAR. SIC i?5Vi§G1R1MJV * ‘

MOHALIIIED GHOU8E,
AGED mom 57 mans. x V’ 4
3/0 3:21 MOHALSMED s’.H4;}&;z.__

nvmmypn, _
AGED mom 43 mags, am 1:31;; ngaamaa.

:cJcwzn> { £7 ‘
1″-;GED–AE’3L7T_V4*~& –
SID SR1 K N

. ‘AGED A13c’>U*:b~’51
. svnzs sm DABAPPA.

” ‘ Ax’-.v.’«._*g:::. A301}? 43 mans, 3/o CHENRIGAPPPA.

AQED 40 YEARS,

319 mm cnucxaxm aowm.

Jéﬁzaaanav,

AGED AEOUT 59 ‘mans.

V’ ” 3:0 3:21 DODDABARIGOWDA.

‘ ” -’13.

T 9. VIRUPAKSI-IAIAH.

scam mom 43 mans,
s/o LATE ammaanaamx.

A ANAHEIJ,
AGED AROUT 3′? Y1,
8/ G SR1 ARMUGAM.

16?

MALLA% GANGADHARAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEAR3,
W[O LATE GANCBKDHARAIAH B R.

K HAGARAJA,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
S} 0 SKI KARI HANUMANITIA.

M mxsamnmvsmua,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, V %
Wm em MANJANNA.

G GANESH,

AGED ABOUT 42

TR SREEHNASA, ‘
AGED ABOUT 5:; mass, _ _
3,10 3121 ‘1’ s Raerinwmxmﬁgs ”

‘AGED 49 sxo sax .

AGED ABOUT 4.5 ‘1’F.»ﬁS.R$,

” P ‘.0 Am
M;-3.1:) ABOUT 32 mans,

” _ va,(«Q..s3H; PI) nmrmmnn KUIEAR.

” A,
é§GEi)”‘ABOUT 39 mans,

k ., $32 sax B mxsanm KUMAR.

LOKESH,

AGED ABOUT 42 YEAR8, 810 SKI HAIIABEVAIAH.

HEEKVANIHA,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

8] O IATE GAHGADHARAPPA.
UDAYASHANKAR,

AGEI) ABOUT 37 YEARS,

Si 5 SR} H L SI-IEEHRGWXYAFPA.

ALLTHE PEHTIONER8 ITO 31 ARE

,’…

3* £31′.

‘WORKING A8 FIRST DNEION ASSISMNTS,
HIGH CGURT OF KARHPLTAKA,
EARGALORE.

{BY am 3 G BBAGAVA!7;’A£3\(QC§)&T1}§; j V’

£2

fr?!-Iv-rr~—>–na-m
:”‘S5§’r*W.’-19″~

TI-IE HON”BLE rm: cr–:m*aJUs1*:<:E, V _
HIGH comrrop
DRALIBEDKAR VEEDHI, "

EANGA.LORE~56£:.§)01. –

THE HIGiI couxér OF _
mnenmnm, BY f;’;{2E._R1i'<_;-I3T:=.m2

':%%,§m1'G.H"R6maH;~.,.:'"' N

am 13 x sum.-saA%% ';%.a.~

% _ sum 13

3121 c RAi}H$VE NDRA.

‘é.1e1f’n;man9?A IEASAR,
V _ ‘5§:i&T”}3 G.€§YATHRI,
V’ “sVF;:–R \22Ei!fICATARAJU,
__sm i;*IRUPnxsHAmH,
~~ _ Sm CHANDRAIEMA,

532m B! Unmen,

sax LOKESI-I NAYAK,
812} N mmsn,

am B c wanna.

am K I-I GURIIRM.

am: maxnsa,

am :3 3 cmwcrnm.

SR1 NEEIAPPA BOVER,
am JAYAPRABHA,

22.

25.

_.’L..¢uwvaw ‘
‘§9i~»9’*:~39*E*?”‘J$£’U-‘*ﬁ:¢’!>”\3$’~’$’3I’1

__41§ *
.’ . 42′;

43.

48.

49.
5!}.

sin’ I’ 3) PREHAIATHA.

3121 5 3 sumn,

SR1 h!E’I’RI Hanunxnxuri-1A121a»;;””

SKI JACi&TCH.ﬁ.NDRA H, ‘ A _
3:21 HA1wuAm*I-IE L,
Sm PADMAVATI-IY R, ‘
SE1 3! S PRAKASH,

am suvsam E4413; _
31-11 E D ‘
Sm’ R stsnm, ” ‘ ._ ‘ _
31213 ».

smé ‘ ‘ ‘

335TAPRl*1B1i?#VAT¥”?+ %
‘”51:r’seHAs’HnmIgt. ,, 4 ”

smj «:3 H

– . SR1 K”‘r..,rca:sHA\?A,

H mun,
imaavnmaswmar,
GALPPHRAMRAJ nmzwv,

emf gfimsumn,
%3RI’R3\MEBH GURUPADAPPA KUDRI,

” 3.3:: MAMATIM.

. am YASHWANTH FRABIIU’ R.

45.’
4?.

SR1 TANVEER RAZIQA,

SMT AN'{H’AMA DEVI K N.

3R1 i-{ARISE KUHAR,

SR1 3 A Bi CHAGASHETIY,
SR1 SHIVALINGAIAH,

SR1 HARIDAB KPLHATH,

SMT SAVYPHA B K,

3:4

53. SMT LAKSI-IMIIA’I’HA K K,

54. SHIT AI-IUPAMA V,

55. am’ SHASHIKALA 13,

am smxmm [21,

am {JSHA 1-3 3,

SET POORNIMA V K,

Sm REKHA H R,

Sm HEMALATI-{A 1*,
am KAVITHA 1»: H,
SR1 sovmmnasu ca 3,,

am’ AARATHI I), V’
312:: G091 H I),

am BHAGYA ‘1’, 4_

U’: H’?

s«~.9s».=~t:93f-3′}-‘°’.55’=3’~

66- smr¢¢IsHREa:%

57. N ” ¢

68. a1&–‘.r__a :.I5.YAsii1§E13;”_;-
% %. RESPOHDERTS 3 T0 as ARE ALL manna,
. W€)RKINCi-A;SV_ 3333103 Asamwm,
‘ ?ﬁ;IGH..CGURT’UF KARIIATAKA.

_vEaHG.ﬁ3.GRE–560 001.

” . air s PATIL, smmcn counam.

FOR R–:t 6; 2.)

“I’1-IESE warr Pmmows mm) Pmmza ‘F0 QUASH

” PROVISO as suasmvmn AT sL.z¢o.14 UNDER
COIAIIIIN 330.4 PERYAHTHVG TO THE METHOIJ OF
Rmcxurrunnr TO THE canny: on smmcn Assxsmm in

THE N0’1’IFIC.A’i’IC}N 110.1-ICZE 22 if 2909, DATEB 291′” JULY
2009, CALLED THE HIGH COURT OF’ ICARNATAXA SERVICE
ICQNDITIONQ OF $ERVICE AND RECKUITKENT} (V
ALENDMENTJ RULES, 2009 AS PER ANNEXUREFA, ETC.

W.. I.

5 — 4

EETWE EN

19.

3!.

SET J MAMATHA,
AGE:33 YEARS, B LINGARAJU.

KUM PRIYA LJGONSALVEB, _
A<}E':36 mans, mo H '-

vrmvaxa 9 V, T .

A.GE:35 mans, am B vssmmm, _

Nos. 2 To 3 ARE cxiéctm ‘£331-;c”r:V,

nmmm, mm: sonar ‘eh
nmuewm. _ *

A(}E:7-F9: $IO_.I.ATE l;i VG vnmmmvpa,
wemmwe CIRCUIT–BENCH,

mPAPA1a’m’,.

‘ ” AGE:57″YISARS, E110 LATE MUHISHAMAPPA.

. Kb Q’ .. ….. “HE !
»{‘£ﬂ3-3319?? SIO C H KL’R1′.SHH&8E7PTY.

” “s§.4’r’r Am Knzarmm,

.;graE;.§_’-zj YEARS. W10 JAVEI3 KHAN.

~ 5:25? If PREMAKUHARI.

Vﬁs(}E:42 YEARS, ‘W10 RAMESH T.

EMT HA G NEKAR,
A€}E:49 YEARS, W10 GURUPADAPEA NEXAR.

SM?’ ROCPA 3 KULKARN1,
AGE:-‘$0 YEARS, ’33] 0 GOPAL.

KUM RAHIhIIJ!§N’£.’?a.h,
A{‘}E:45 YEARS. D] O IEEHABOOBSAB.

I2.

14.

17.

“.2c.

SET 9 M MANJUIA

AGE:3ﬁ YEARS. W10 1″ VISWANATH.
an’: X s JAYAPADMA I
5:33:55 YEARS, wgo J K

snrrrcmmam, _ ‘-

.nc;z::3*2′ mags, won 2; 1::..1:_vApp,x,_ V

smamma, _ _ _V
AGE:43 YEA.R8,. 1′ V
W10 3 1′ mxsxumamtagi, n v
am” SB?-£ARAT§iAI.1E5-$1;-.. ‘V . V
AGE;55_ ‘~

G s_.sz:§E4,eri§f:H;’ 1;
AG1E::40_»YE’ARS,. ‘

733:) E. 3″

“m1=:;s<2 'agcegz

s1§;':«2'o$.5 T6. is

— , WORKZIWGAS SRJUSGHENTWRHERB,

HIGH couRf1f__;_)_1? KARNATAKA, BAHGALORE.
¥ss3a*r4$HyAMA1a,

V _ “Ag;:E,:45_ 23433, We Joan vxcmn.

,:= V’
.g%xGE:43 YEARS, W10 SUIJHIR JO3HI.

” yam M V 8}-IEEI.A,

AGE:39 YEARS, W10 ANANTBA KUHAR.

SET K G REKUKAE,
AGEH}. YEARS, WIO RAllE8Ii.

K ERINIVASA HURTHY,
AGEM3 YEARS, S/O LATE VA KEEHAVA LEURTHY.

Shari’ K SUEATHI,
AGtE:32 YEARS, W/’O LAKE 3 N KUKESHAN.

26.

2?.

39.

SET PANKAJA S.

A’-‘.}E:30 YEARS, W] O GIREE K R.

B A KRISHNAKUMAR,
AGE:3’Z YEARS, S] O A A.

V HHA,

AGE:5O mares. s;o P3 3 Ynm. .

MAHENDRA KUMAR.

AGEM-1 YEARS, SIO T KRISHNACHAR.

smaamnmmmm
ms:-:2 mans, D10 SUBRA}5AH”r’A, é

SHTYASHODAKL, ” 1. _ _
AGE:34 mA12s,w/oK;3_mAxJu_mnm.TV.v–.’…v

3L.Nos. 19 To 29 ARE T
Junanmmwnxrmemp ‘

sL,»:§;’;%}c”:a._*iioR::ﬁ€aAe.’s’rENoaRAPHER.

‘HIGH CFQU E.’.’r»£>F.
_

‘.°’*S”‘:”‘!*’

SE13 v mmmm, Anv. )

Hzﬁikmfz THE cam’ JUSTICE,
HIGH COURT 0? EARRATAKA,

” E&H’GALORE. REP BY ITS

REGISTRAR GESERAL.

‘ ‘ man coum or mmmwmm,

BAH(3ﬁLOR.E, REP BY ITS
REGISTRAR GENERAL.

H LAKBHIIEEIARAYARA,
JUAHITHA THEJZASWIRI,
YAHUNA K L;

SHYLAJA R,

7. VEENABM,

3. mam c,

9. AHAKDH, I

10. wumrmnn,

11. mmrazc,

12. mmmmua,

13. ” V
91393.3 TO V
:’~3r.JL¥DGMEK’I’ WRIYERS; ~ _
wasma in arm’ ‘C(}UR1′ §2>_E’

:4. 5 ‘

15. ” .’ ”

13. . ~

19.

29; ” 1gxALLIisttJ}zrtIss£;,

. i 2,;-:51 mo,
~ 22. «. frvs MUR’1*§iY,
‘ 1:.-3. i”$’T:.’ffUKAMHA.

.. “$.L.Raa. 14 T0 24 ARE MAJORB,
. WORKWG A3 AS8I8’I’Alﬂ’ REGESTRARS,
HIGH COURT OF KARRATAKA.
RESPONDENTS

IBYSRI I3A3AVAPRPLBHU S PATIL, 333101? C’-UUNSEL
FOR R~I & 2.3.

BRIT 3 li£ADIi’AVACHAR, ADV. FOR R–‘? 5 11.
SE1 3 V’ !’?ARA8R£I”IA.N, ADV. FGR R46.)

THESE WET!’ FE’I”I’l’I€3ﬂB FILE}? PRAYIHG TC?
QUASHI DECIARE (12) THE I-I103 GGURT OF KARKATAKA
SERVICE [CONDITIONS OF SERVICE AND RECRUﬂ’L$N’l’)

{I AnmNI)MEN’n RULES 2009 3: N011FIcATIQx;_”‘N§);ﬁ§2::-«V.
221/09 m*n.2+.2.o9 PUBLISHED IN Kammragia *
m*n.2a.2.o9 PROIKICED A3 AmzEx..1s,,~§;:}… Ti*HE~.::H:G:1:”
movie”: 01? KARNATAKA 3ER?JidE3’« {coNi::r:fmi~;s;”‘t)F
smwrcm AND Réjmis
mrma; rzv Normcamcm -30.365″ 307f.2′(3{?f3:..}3Afj?ED

12.5.2099 PIJBLISHED 11»: um»
13.5.2ao-9 PRQDUCED (an :1
AMENDMERT RULES}-._1″If Nc%’rIEf£€33¥;I?i_1H~I_O.HCE 22112009
mmn 2s.5.2m9 anzwrm
mrr:31:: 23.5.3039 ’30 FAR AS THEY
bugnmzcaanan To rmz: pears

mif ” %’31’E:i;)Gé3gé2aﬁ:R§” A’19 “”‘£§L.No,2 1. JUDGEHENT
are :j;j.-1§o.,2§cs–,. _$E1~I’1oR JUDGEMENT wnrrsns AT
sL.N.._1ém IN’-I RULES AND AT sL.Nc>s.39,
32 Armies II»: {rim RULES AND ASST. REGISTRARS
‘sL.Nc::. Iéxygusnnnwm RULES IR ‘SCHEDULE III

4 AT mm mm m ma: nnarr mums, av

‘ = THE sum as UNGO!4IS’I’l’I’U’I’I0NAL,
. VIRE3. nmcnmmamxv. VIOLATIVE
“-:2}? I*;%ti~rtc1PLEs or NATURAL mama AND

UNF;f7E?ORCEABLE IN LAW, ETC.

1. K BHXNJUNATH,

BIO KENCKAIWA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
WUHZKIHG AS FEON IN KARHATMM HIGH COURT,
HIGH COURT BUILDIZKG3,

II3R.E.R.AﬁEDKﬁ.R VEEDHI,

EANQALORE-560 {)9 I .

20
B SRIHIVAEA RAG PAWAR, _

510 mm mm mo, AGED ABOUT 39 -.
wcmmcre A3 A’£”T’E!’fDER 111 KARHATAKA .. j 3 ..,_ j ;_.v _

COURT. HIGH COURT BUILDIHGS,
DR.B.R.AMl”3EDKAR VEEI3HI.
BANGALORE-550 G01.

A mxasnmn. MURPHY, *~ ‘ _ ~
3/ 0 AHJANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 4:: YEARS, ” ” ;
w(:>RmNGA.a PEON M’ KARNATAKA H193
HIGH COURT Buﬁbmas, ” .

DR.B.R.Am5EDKAR VEEDEI, ‘

BANQALORE-560.901. «.

srmrmawnz – * ‘ _
we R wzmaooa AGEI}~A£;~’sQ’UT–~3? mans,
wtrmxnwcsss swrsim-.:’3. Inimnmmxa man coum’,
HIGH QGQRT BU_IIJ§!I!§G~S,. ‘V .. ‘
DR.a,t:Ar.EBEuKax unmnriz,

mmALo£E%~sw%-ooI%;% % ‘

3/ GB AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

‘ » WOR}CING’A8 PEON IR’ KARKATAKA HIGH COURT,

HIGH CKDURT BIJILDRIGS,

A a.nR;:.=:.R.AuBr:DKAR VEEDI-II,
_ a.e;zz;m,exE-5ao om.

1 THAB c,

S.f’0 ‘ﬂIi ANHA, AGED ABOUT 4 1 YEARS,

._ AS WATCHHAN B!’ KARRATAKA HIGH
,. COURT, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS,
= f)’R.B.R.A%EDXAR VEEDHI,

BaANCH’&LOR.’E~56O WI.

T K YO ,

81 O KRI3HHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
WY3RHI’IGA.8 PEON IE KKRHATAKA. HIGH SOURT,
HIGH COURT BUILIJING-8,

DR.B.R.A1£BEDXAR VEEDHL

BANGALORE560 001.

E GOPAIAEHHA,

SIG BORAIAH, AGED ABGUT 43 YEARS,
WORKING A5 PEON IN KARNATAKA HIGH CJOURT,
HIGH COURT BUILDINGQ,

DR.B.RAMBEDK&R VEEDHI,
BANGAL<}RE~560 001.

BHDIWAKAR,

szo LATE K v KAGAHAJ, new Aa<:iu*i*–3§YE.§R:§;-L :;_ AA
wonxnm A8 92:32: In i{ARNA'I,'AKA men mum,

HIGH COURT BUILDIIIG-'B,
DR.B.R.A!$EDKAR
ELANG.ALORE–560 om. "

K\fJA<3:ANHA'!'Ii,'~~._ .' V

3/0 E 11 V'ENi€3%.T:'§.JmRAlln3LIﬁ;}I; j x %

AGED ABOUT 34 YEArcs..'-ﬁx; _ . "0'as'$wEEPER IN
KARKATAEA HIGH <:.QUR'r_.A "
HIGH mum BL;rn..1:;rm3.,' Z
nn.a.s:.an;:.aEnx;xnivs:-Enax, '-

av , 'V

V"310'MV*vENK3mSr§hppA;_£GﬁD ABOUT 37 YEARS,
WQRI§I{\E4'3a PEG?!' I-HKRNATAKA HIGH COURT,
"HIGH COURTL«BUvI1.I3§1iGB,

DE-1.B.R.A£!BEi}E.ﬁLR..V'£5EDHI,
B-AE'QaﬂLLC)RE§~5ﬁ0 mi.

. C§iAHDRE8.I1EKAR R,

' as; 01;: AGED ABOUT 35 mans,
_wQRxmG A8 manor: :1: KARHATAKA HIGH courrr,
V _ '2~.1r_1z.";H*«~::T_:::':A–..r1='-:'.1* ammmes,

. "aR..3.R..;uaaBEnxAR VEEDHI,

BARQ._A.£ORE-560 001.

8., 0 v1:’NxA:r mo. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
wc:sxxm<3 as mom :1: KARKATAKA HIGH comm

H HIGH coma': Btmznmos.

DR.B.R.Al{BEIDKAR VEEDHI,
BAIIGALORE-560 O01.

SjO , AGE!) ABOUT ‘H YEARS,
WORKING A8 PEOH IN KFLRNATAKA HIGH COURT,
HIGH COURT EUILDIHG3,

I3R.E.R.£%EDK£R VEEﬁHI,

BANGALORE560 em.

1?.

M SGHABHEKAR,
8/0 H K HAHABEVA SWAHY.

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

wonxcumas PEGN IR mmrmram Ga 4::.xc.fs’::.;:2€V,’ ‘-

HIGH con:-rr BUILDINGS, T ..
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEIDHL;
aa.H<3a.LaRr3..5eo 991.;

K 3 SHIVARAJU, "

S} O {ATE SHIVANAR’JE(}O_WD1%;.._.
AGEDABOUT41 ‘ u V

wonmm as PEOE ‘HIGH covzrr,
HIGH COURT BUILD.I1i”f<}$,' .
DR.B.R.AMBEDKA£!.VEEErH£, '
EiAN(3uﬁLQ1'i£2«56j;) 091;

R 3'¥33'3<-'131xﬁ~.-':V- . ._ '

131:1; ¢ "GED P.BOI.iv'fI' 35 YEARS,

HIGH comm',

V HIGE ..coum$'1jmG3_,
nR.B.R;;3mEDmR' WEEHL
"3A}I_GALORE'–56G pa :4'.

sag %% vA R-; '

. :31 o rmmacimﬁnﬁﬁ K, AGED ABGUT as mans,

vva3Rrmv<ms__;é1s::z av KARNATAKA men COURT,

V :..r:.tcmcouRT BUILDINGS,

1;.”

a , _ UR.5.R~.AMBEDEAR VEEDHI,
_ :sgmrG.1_Lc:RE_5ae om.

1:: R,
K RANGFLNATH, £3313 ABQUT 40 YEARS,

.. WORKINGAS PEON IR KARNATAKA HIGH COURT,

HIGH COURT BUILDINGS,
DR.B.R.A%EDKAR VEEDHI,

H BAHGALORE~56O cm.

A HEM mo,
3/ o T ASHWATH HARhYA.N mo.

AGED ABOUT 35 mm.

woxxmc. as 1290:: m KARHATAKA HIGH comm’,
HIGH comer BUILDINGS.

mz.B.12.aamEnr:Ax VEEDHI.

BANGALORE-560 001.

22.

23
J MANJUAIUTHA,

310 mm JAVARAEAH, AGED mom 31 YEARS,
WORKING A3 PEQN IN KARHATAK6. HIGH COIIKT: .V

HIGH COURT BUILDIHGS,
DR.B.R..AMBEDKAH VEEDHI.
EA.HGAI.ORE~56O GO 1 .

RAVIKIIMRRRC, V

we um; CHIKKA ‘ 4’ ‘

AGED ABOUT 28 YEA%.

woremara as more 11: axe}: 1

HIGH CQURT BUILDIN{}$§”
I3R.B.R.A%EDEAR VEEIZIEI}
ﬁA3ChkLORE~56Q 001. ”

Lnnxnsumapm. _ v _

3/ 0 mxsammn, A_(}’r3ﬂ«r4E;Ot_1’T’3%i..YiE.&R8,
wmzm~IGVAs PEQN. IH–KﬁSR!§3&TA’I€ABI{}H covrrr.
HIGHCOUi3TBII1I.Dl1i”Cr8-,’ – ‘
DR.B.F;;AEF;E!:EnKAR ?U’F”E1)HI_, ‘=

S164-XARIGOWDA,’ jean ABOUT 41 make,

. WORK{N<3AS wmcnmn mr KARNATAKA HIGH

COURT, HIGH Ci')Ul?1" BUILDINGS,

V éz::.a.E..R.A1m£:bKA12 vmznm,

_BAH£4;i&L{3RE-560 001.

3/03: zéopaxa, AGED ABOUT 32 mans,
wekmla A8 men I15! KARNATAKA HIGH COURT,

. HIGH coum Bmwmas,

'§}R.B.R.A&EDKPs.R VEEDI-II,
BAHGALORE-560 001.

V D DEANJUHATH,

Sf 0 DEVEGOWEIA, AGED ABGUT’ 32 YEARS,
WOREIIVG A8 PEON IR KARHATAKA HIGH COURT,
HIGH CGIIRT BUILBZNGB,

DR.B.R.A1’5!BEI)KAR VEEBHI,

BARGALGRE-560 W1.

RABIESH E K,
S} O DODDA HARIQOWDA,

28.

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

woammas more IN KARNATAKA rzz<3;;;;":2.§::'U:szjfr_.' % ' '

HIGH coum' BUILDINGS. V
DR.E.R.A3&l3EDKAR VEEDHL"
:E!.A.NCrALORE~56O 001. V

HP3HAH'rHARA'LA1AH,,_ ' ;
sfo M 3 Pommmm. AQEQ ABOL'~'I__' 4'D_YE'AR$'," "
WORKINGAS ATTENDER EN mmmmm HIGK
CGURT, IHGH COURT B{IILI}IHG$, '* .
nR.B.RAn:BEDEAR«vEz£¢DHL– _ V
BAHGALORE~56(5'-W1, * f . '-

KSANANTH PADLLuimBHA,u.L ' V '-

SID K '

AGED A303? swr-zrzpma m
KAR«'FPiTAKA E163 Paiﬁliﬁi'. f *

maze: C§3t;R1'"EUII;l3f£NGE§,-'
L}1?§.B';1e"Ee-553935-?¢_EPDEE£;¥£_VE:E£)1?II,.

1 ' 1,

sic vn=2UPAxsP..AmI;'AaEn ABOUT 39 YEARS,
women as PEOH. {N KARNATAKA HIGH comm',

— » HIGH”ccUR’i’3Un.DmGa,

I§R.B.R.AE£F3EDKAR VEEDHI,

A’ 33n1mgxLoRm;56o 001.

V _ no H,
. “2-am, ;.»=a..’rE’ zmmmn mo, AGE13 ABOUT 30 mans,

wwoatmie A3 PEON Ill KARKATAKA HIGH court,
HIGH “COURT BUILDHIGS,

O. m.:z.B.R.aumE1>xAR vssmn,

BANGALORE-560 001.

5 R I.AK8HlI[IR’ARAYANA,

5/ O LATE K HNAP%,

AGED ABOUT 40 YEAR3, ‘WORKING A3 WATCHHAN IN
K’ARHA’£&I(J’i EIGH COHRT,

HIGH COURT’ BUILDINGS,

DH.B.RJ9.%EDKAR VEEDHI,

B&NGALORE~560 001.

S I? RAGHU,
Si O EREGOWIJA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
WORIWWGAB PEGN IN KARNACCAKA HIGH COURT.

36.

39.

2.’:

HIGH COURT BUILDINGS,
DR.B.R.AllBEDE.AR VEEDHI,

3.-we.-\LoRE-56o 001.

C RAMESSIPIA,

310 caANHAIAH.AGEnABoi:T:a§YEARA” ‘~. «. ”

wonxmcms mow mVrKa,Rm’mK£ HIG?IC!;’}!.IRT, ;
KIGHCOUR’I’EU1LDI14It3–$,*~,_ ” u ‘
DR.B.R.AB$EDKAR VEEI§§’II;’

aanaamlwseo ooz.

mo GAHGAIAH, AGE!) ABOUT_.-41″YEﬁRf’:’o,
WORKINQAS SWEEPER JEKARKATKEQX HIGH coum’,
BIG}! <;:r,u1a1fBIz'_n,::n§g;s," '
DR.B.E.A1u;:3EDKﬁ1R1(EEDHI, '-

____ H

1 "31 39 YEARS,
Bi! KARNATAIM HIGH COURT,
HIGH COURTLEUE{»B–Il§IQ8,

DB,B.R.Al§BEDiiAR~–.VEEDHI,
BAKG_ALORE__–5t';Q GEM.

, CHAND PF-.8.11A, _

' i$;o'vnAs'rAGIR"sAa, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
_tm:a;e,1c:zz<:GJas wxrcauam 111 xanmrmm HIGH
V _ '<:n,*;.*.1¥:!,_ comm’ Btmnmcs,

. “mé~.5.R msnssnxak VEEDHI,

E.AR£?u_%LORE–560 00:.

I. iianjmvanmmm,

EHO VENKAT
AGED ABOUT 43 YEAR8,

H 4′ WORKING A8 PEON IR KARNATAKA IIIGI-I COURT,
HIGH COURT BUILDEIGB,

I3R.B.R.AEE3EDKAR VEEDHI,
BAHCE-.ALORE-5l5O 001.

R GEETHA.

I33} 0 I) K RAMACHAHDRA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,

WORKING A8 PEOH IR’ KARNATAKA HIGH COURT,
HIGH CGUR?’ BUILDINGS,

40.

42.

‘T 45.

DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE~560 001.

RAMESHIK M N,
3,10 A, AGED ABOUT 3′? YEARS,

wommqeas men IN KARRATAKA “‘

HIGH CO’UR”I’ BUB.-DING5,
DR.B.R.AM.BEDKAR VEEDHI.

BANIHXLORE-560 001.

msanmm, ‘ -. 1
sm VEERSI-IE’1″.{“{}, acme ABOUT 44 V

woammas PEON INVI£ARNATAKA.__HI<}Hv-CGIJRT,

HIGH mum' I3UILDIIiG8'; %

DE.B.R.An£BEDKAR vEEp_HI,~ _ ._
BANGALGRE-5t5£) 4191. *

mmxénsgg. %

,-310 .a.G$':é 44 YEARS.

"varo1e2:12=:GA£;'m_Gz§ xx HIGPI coum',
HIGH CGI,IK1"BU'iLDINI§AuRTA–\:E.EDHI,

BA_I§IGALCiRE%56£¥ om;

– » Lasﬁz-mam;

Mo K c AGED mom :4 mas,

‘ A3 more :1: KARNATAKA HIGH scum’,
_ H363 ‘CGURT EUILBING3.

‘ T. ‘Q_R.B.R_.A;lIBEDI(.AR VEEDHI,

” ‘x?.,E1§(3ALﬂRE~560 om.

maﬁa,
,2 o ABDUL $ATAR, AGED ABOUT 3: meme,

” -az.:t::RmI-re A8 more IN KARNATAKA HIGE coumi.

HIGH COURT EUILDENG8,
{)R.B.R.AHBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-563 001.

K CHAﬂBR% ,
3; 0 mm=Am1,AeE3:: mam 44 YEARS,
mama AS PEON £8 KARHATAKA HIGH comm’,
HIGH coumr mntmmes,

DR.B.R.Al§£BEDKAR vmnm.

BANGALORE-560 001.

48.

49.

NAGAMMA,
WI (3 RARASl}ﬂiA GGWDA,
AGED ABQUT 41 YEARS,

wonmm A8 JAMEIJAR IN 25:13:}! bC{.)i J1i*V*I’,

HIGH coum BUILBING3. ~ T .. .
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BARGALORE–560 001.;

MANJUNATHA K, ”

5/0 LATE
AGED ABOUT woaxane as CABLE
OPERATOR IN KARJé:A’rA.m»HIGH%[coLtI?f,
HIGH COURT Bunmxas, * . ”
DR.B.RAnmEDKAPV–vEVEDH1..L “

mxmmmafsact oo: ‘

K 3 ” Q H»
310 K AEGUT +4 YEAR3,
A5; 1″1s.’QE’!._IIIi’ man COURT.

V ‘ VHIGH–Q¥£)UR’If Ergmgizwsa,
DR,B.R.ﬁi3I§§3EEKFxR VEE-‘D31.

D é;1a§.s1I1§EvA,% ”

. 3/ 0 1)’ Lmzmw. mo, AGED ABOUT 31 mans,

WORIEINGJEQ PEDN IN’ KARNATAKA HIGH COURT,

mGH.coU1?r”‘sU1LnmGs,

_DR.B.R*.~AMEEDKAR vmnm,

B5Hr;a;,o:aE-55o cm.

A 3 v’éE1é”EmvAa mmrnv,

31′ 0- VEHKOB Rﬁﬁ), AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.

.. WQRKING A8 PEOH IN KARNATAKA HIGH COURT.

HIGH COURT BUILDINGS.

DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEIXII,

BANGALORE~560 001.

E S SURIL KUHAR,

3ft) 3 B S AGED ABOUT 34 YEAR3,
‘WORBNG A8 PEOH IN KARHAEAKA HIGH COURT,
HIGH COURT BUILDINGS.

}3R.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI.

BANGALORE-560 001.

smmmeam K.

310 KARIGOWDA. AGED ABOUT 44 mm, 2′ ‘f ~

womcmcas mnnmrmn IN xnmvcrnica
HIGH coum, HIGH comer BUILDING8, —
m2.B.R.AmEI:m<AR VEEDHI. H
BAHGALORE»560 om.

M 3» SHIUAKUMAR,

5/0 smnaammmn, AGED 41 = ”

wommco as WA’DGH19mN._Hf KARI_%TAI£.3 %
HIGH coum’, HIGH coUm~«1aUn.DB.vaa,A A
raaaemmsnxaavmznm,’
BAN’GAL{)RE~56Q.001. *

HhRI8I-I 3. ~
310 B AGED
WORKING AS warcmgaxcz-m:
HIGH (_:£}.€1R.’i’, HIGH ccavnfr Eungnnms.
nrLB._1€.,A3g;$E_DIcA.R VEEDHL. ‘

3 v v1sHwA;ixArz:;%TkTA~+ & _ %

5)’ Q B.VEf€1(A’rE3HA,’)1GED ABOUT 35 mans,
wommm ma 1=i’:*.<m_;2I mnmrmca HIGH COURT,

' » HIGH VCQUKF BUTLDING8,

DR.B.R.Ah+EEDK-AR VEEDHI,

!3.ARG:6LORE-560 001.

. 3,! 1:: Emma, AGED mom 4 1 mass.

WUSEKIHG A8 PEG]! IN KARHATAKA HIGH COURT.
E_§I(}§§'COURT BUILDINGS,

" . I}R.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI.

§.5'iHGALORE~560 001.

mmmmmmm K R,

I}! O , AGED ABOUT 39 YEAE,
WOIﬂ{HVGAS PEOR IN ICHRHIKTAKA IEIGH COURT,
HIGH COIERT BUEDWGE,

DRJ33 .AhmEDKAR VEEDHI,

BANGALORE-560 001.

FATHA KAWAZ KHAN,

SIG R D KHAN, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
WORBINGA8 WATCHMAN IN KARKATAKA

HIGH COURT, HIGH COURT BUILDINGQ,

59.

DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

BANG.-ALORE560 O01.

xczamvx, « ‘_ .; V
3,10 LATE RA..IANHA,AGED 1413011’? ft-3 ‘mans, ”

wonmmns more IN HIGH

HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, ” ._ ”
DR.B.R.A_l$EDKAR V’
BAHGALGRE-560 001. ”

s VINAYAKA, 3 ‘ ” V

sxo mm s MARI, .z; A.:»;Bot3*rj29
WORKING A8 PEON EN ICARlEA’1’.AKA_’HI<.}_H count.
HIGH coum BUIL!3H¥GS,. A % = %
DR.B.R.&1!lEEDKj_AR vmnm,' % ~

BANeALo:§E¢5§o~.ece;;" " —

mo c;iE1¢2s,5;As;,'AGE:tm3oU'r 42 YEARS,

'moat m HIGH comrr,
HIGH CGiJm"}3UILD§.!iGS-,
"DR~B.R.Anm.EDK.&R*1!EEDHI,

BiA1€G:ALO'RE'~'56Q_ ':'m_1';' '

1. 8RE1§D.F§ARA’G Jr,

Si O JAVAFAYAFPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,

awommce A3 ” mo “” ” N In xanmmxa men COURT,

HEGH CQHRT }3UILI}ING5,

2. “ag;a;’a,a2{£EsEDxAx vxsnm,
A “33A;3a.a;mE-550 em.

mmmv <3 11,
go LATE MARISI-IETTY G.

" AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, wcmmicms warcxmn m

KARHATAKA HIGH COURT,

1" é HIGH ceum Bmnmcs.

DR.B.R.AhlBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BAHGALORE-360 D01 .

V HRAWA,

3/ G VENKATESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEAR8,
WDRICIING AS PEOH IN KAKNATAKA HIGH COURT,
HIGH COURT BUILDINGS,

DR.B.IR.A%EDKAR VEEDW,

BANGALORE–56O 001.

66.

JAGADEESH KUEAE

8/ O PADMANABHA BHAT, AGED ABOUT ‘Ki YEARS,
WCIRKIXG A8 PEON IN KARNATAKA HIGH COURT,
HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, ‘-
DR.B.R.A£mEDKAR VEEDKI,

BANGA.I.ORE–560 001.

M sxnmsna (32.1, ” V *-

3[O LIIADEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 41 _ ‘=,. ‘

wonmaas PEON 11: KARNATA.KA’HIQHvC;G13;2T;

HIGH coum BUILDINGS, , ,

1:aR.B.RAnmE1)mR vmmrz. T A ‘ 1 M

BANGAL{)RE–560 001. V < *
A PE'I'Ii'£Q_NERS

{By Sri RABIJUNDA 339$; 3521:3193 c'i::3t; 1¢rs:ELV1»?oR _
3:z:,.1gmm§;:z~..mw:a,_} '

"'rHE H(:=N¥sVi;E.¢I:$i§:'§i§.Is?r1cE,
31:33 COURT"Q'I?_KARIt'ATAKA,
HI("}H_ COURT zatixminos,

' » DR.B.R.Al§EBEDKAR VEEDHI,

B}-':K(}ALO'EE,fS6G 001,

E1-zap: svrrs REGISTRAR GENERAL.

. ";..=z1'<?»;.=_1 e.;:.~UR*r op xnnmrnxca.

HIGH; noun? aumnmea,
¥;_';'Fc HR ALEEDKAR VEEDHI,

" I. aanamoas-sac 001.

5121 Menu M 1.,

4′ 8×0 3121 B LINGEGOWBA,
AGED ABOUT 34 ‘new, Rm’: No.1′-5,

224, RTPS COLGHY, 8 GAR,
RMCHHR DI3’1″RIC’.t’.

his KHBORA,
DIG SR1 KK I£ACBAIAH,AGEIJA3OU’I’35YEARS,

RIAT 30.124, EHETTAHALLE raczwa,
Hm Ex’r’ErrsIoN, mmmmm COKVENT,
MAz.mIALLi TOWN. HARDYA DISTRECT.

SR1 SHIVANAKIAFTA B,

AGED AEOUT 40 YEAR3,

WDRKING A8 SEGONI) IJIVTIBIOH A38IB’IIAB’1′,
HIGH COURT OF’ KARNAT.BKA,

DR 13 R AKBEDKAR VEEDKI,
BAHGALORE«-566 00 1 .

SR1 R.&MALIING:ﬁPPA K M,

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, %
woxxnm AS szcoxn DNI8It3N~A3Si_
HIGH comrr 0? KARRATAKA, 1,
DR.B.R.AMBEDK;AR vEEnm,=, L _ T
BsAN€3:ALORE~560 cm. , A ~

3121 mnganm ‘1’ A.

AGED mom 42 mans, ‘

vmaxmc A3 smcorrn nrvizixnii-;xss1s?rA£wT,Av’ V’

man COURT O’i?.__KR,mI~§T&.’Ch,” ._ ” A .
nR.B.x.AuBEnK.a’R VEEDHL,’ * A
aANGALQRE–5oop9’1.,_ V

man A£5{)U”i’ 35_
wcsama as sgcaan nrvmxozc assxsmm,

* » HIGH {ZOURT OF KARNATAKA,

E’.’~R.B.R.AB£BEDFAR VEEDHI,

i.EsAHgALoR£.'”;56o 001.

– 3 3U.!JA.

” EEG-EU 40 YWR3,

as smcorsrn nrwsron A8813″I?AN’I’,
A._EiIGI*§” CGUR1′ OF KARHATAICA.

O. 1aR,B.R.AmEnKAn vmnm,

-EAH(FI.LORE«560 001.

BR} GOPINATH B R,

AGED ABOUT 4′? YEARS,

WORKING A8 SECOND DNISIOH ASSISTANT,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE»-560 001.

SET MAHSUR PASHA,

AGED ABOUT 35 YT,

WORKING A8 SECOND DIVISION ASSETAETI’,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

14.

DR.B.R.AMBEDI(AR VEEDHL
BANGALORE~56O 001.

sm’ Gmnnnmmr 3,
AGED ABOUT 45 mm.

woxexma AS snzcoxr: Dxvxszmi $Sé:si”m fP.., «. ”
HIGH comers? Kanwcram, *

DR.B.R.AliIEEDE’AR wmﬁm,
BAHGALc)RE–56(3 001. ” ‘

SMTHEMAP, 1’

AG-ED mom ; j _ ‘A
woama A8 sscozm r>r¢IsIo;mss1.9:ca2rr,
HIGH coum os.2:.aJ2mA*ra.KA,’ VA
BR-ammnnrznx % ‘
‘

53 3523935 nzvmion ASSISTANT.
HIGH CGEJRT
“‘DR.B.RAMBE.0XARA-SJEEDHI.

BI.%gHGALeRE”»$tE£_3 mi;

% .. am

AGED ABQUT YEAR8,

‘ awonmne ASSECOHD nzvrszon Assmram.
_ man com? or KARHATAKA,

_ ‘n_R.n;na_A2,mEnmR vmmm,
“mzqmL.<3:eE.5eo om.

.sI%1..§?21¢I<ATEsH N,

, EGED ABGUT 35 YEARS,
VWORKINGAB SECOND DIVISION }'s£818TA1'1'I',

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.
£3R.B.R.AMBEDK&R VEEDHL

B.AN(M.E.ORE–~56O £301.

SR1 JAYARABKU K,

AGE]? ABOUT 34 Y%.

WURKING A3 SECURE DIVISIQR ASSISTANT.
EIGI-I COURT 0}? KARNATAKA,
DR.B.R.AMIE3EI)KAR VEEIDIHI,
EANGALORE~56O O01.

SR1 MANJUHA’I”§IA G.

AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,

WORKING as saconn I)IV’I3IDI§_A8Sg-IST;h2€’I_;. ”

HIGH courer 0? KARNATAJIA.
nR.B.R.AmaEm:AR vmsnm,
BANGALORE~5ﬁ0 001. 4

em: RAMAKRISHRA DVEZ,rV_ ‘
AGED ABOUT 33 * ~. _

woaxmeas sscom pxwalcsrmf A88 ” 3

HIGH COURT GF’§QAREATAK&, V
I3R,B.R.Ah[}3EDI~L§R VEEEEE, n ”
BAﬂGA.LORE~560001. <
3MT]E 1A1,» _ ..

A{;EI:_AB;)UT3c:+y1;;g’Rs. ‘ ”
SEC-.Qr’~i1:) Diviszm: ABSISTART.
HIGH ABQUTEQ
wagxmc} as s.Ecc.>m:> DIVISION Asaxswazrr,

– . HIGH SOURT OF KARNATAKA.

m:z.B.RAm3EDr.m VEEDHI, ‘

V i.m{3ALoRE–55o om.

” ‘Ai}E_7f£ wow 35 mans,

. “Ear V.

F-I

A8 SECOND nrvxsmw ASSISTANT,
..i-iIx’2’*.H COURT OF KAI-EHATAKA.

,. bR.B.RA§mEDKAR VEEDHI.
‘vP*.;ABGALORE-360 om.

SR1 P H K,

AGED i\BOUT 34 YEARS,

WORKING A3 SECOND BIVISION ASSESTANT.
HIGH COURT OF’ KA.RRA’I’!LKA,
DR.B.R.AMBEBXAR VEEDHI,
BAR(3’a&LQRE–»’56O 001 .

SR1 UEESI’! H 3,

AGEB ABOUT 31 YEARS,

WORKING A8 SECOND DIVISIQN A88I8TAN’f’,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAI-EA.

2?.

T 30.

DR.B.R.AhmEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-566 001.

SHT HC,

AGEDABOUTHYEAR3.

wonxmc A8 smcoxm nxvmzoze Assxsraxf
HIGH comm’ 011′ Hnzanarraxca,
DR.B.R.A1amEDKAR v.=3EmII,_
BANCBAIQRE-560 001. ‘

am menu L, A
AGED mom 2 1 mans, ~ ._

woamaas sacoxn H, ” – .%1oN”.aasw:§x:§*f;~§V”‘%

HIGH coum’ OF KARHATAKA, _ ‘- .
DR.Ei.R.Ah£B13}DI€fLR vzsnnr;-.
BAIVIGALGRE-560 ’em. _ .

3M’;”3′. .

Assscqma nwisiom ASSISTANI’.
HIGH cczézmr 03′
‘DR.B.R.A3£3EDKﬁR”EfE.EDPH,

EéJiQALGRE=~569 mi;

V ,, sM’ruirE$Yh~K,

AGED Ascmfr mas,

‘ iwoaxme as smcoxm nrvmron ASSIBTANF,
_ H1631 team 0? KARHATAKA,

T. 3:a_12.a;1?,.A:;aBEnxAR VEIZDHI,
” om.

DRAIQIIA O,

.. AGED ABOUT 39 YEMIS,
‘W(>RKIN€3 A8 SECOND DIVISION $83-IBTANT,

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKFL.
DR.B.R.AMBEDI’IAR VEEBHI,
BLARGALORESGO 001.

SET PERT!-IEBHA K 3.

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

WORKING AB SEC-OED DIVISION ASSISTANT,
HIGH COURT OF KAKRATAKA,
DR.B.R.A%EI)KAR VEEDEI,
BANGf\LORE-550 001.

32.

33.

1 .

sm%sm T %

am KANAKA N,
AGED ABOUT 40 mam, . _ ,
wcmmm as smonn DIVISION nasmmz«m
HIGH COURT OF 1mRm’z*A1c:s;” . .. T’
nR.B.RAmEnmR vmmaiz,

BANGALORE-560 001.

8RIRAVI3HANKA.RB,’ _

AGED mom 32 AV ~– ._ %
WORKING AS smozma Dwzsmi Aaaletmm,
HIGH coum cm ”

DR.B.R.AHBEDSEA$vt VE’_ED3£I, ”

BANGALORE660 om. %     "

SR1 vuwr   _ A _

AGEn;ABmUT anwmxas, A ‘ V.
womcmc; s~Ecom:; D:’V1§§IOH, ASSISTANI’,
I-Ilcm c.-‘:mII\2’r’–w<3F
DR.3..R';-:uémE1:+mn"vrs3m:)ﬁI,;

Azmn ABQUTSQ
woame as S..ECQi'ID DIVISION AS3i8TAN"i',

* » HIGH Ci,OU'Ri' OF KARKATAKA.

I3R.B.R.AﬁEB_EDF.'AR VEEDHI,

' s._nmx;ALoRE';'55o 001.

" xnmm.

” ;.n_c:.sn 3 1 mm.

mama as snconm nrvrsron A3SI.’3’PAH’I’,
.H1<2«r:* coum' OF' xanmrmm,

O. DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHL
aaxeazons-sac om.

THE memrma mpmnmmnom,
I-KGH COURT 0′; KARHATAKA,
DR.B.R.Ahl.’BEDKAR vmznm,

BANGALORE-560 O01.

(BY SR1 BABAVAPRABHU 8 PATH», SENIOR COUIESEL

FORR–1,2&36.)

mass wrzrr PETTFIONS man PRAYmG.?f€Z5 _
exam noses 3/zoos annmmzea .v_;ir..,2o_i§;2{2c9′,~-T
onnsn no.Hc-E 3/zoos m’,5.§’.é’cx;1§ V
FAR as rr RELATES TC} REs.i?§:>1n:»E:;ei1*”T1§rt>..ét;- ‘(.’}i15?gL’.z_E1’vi*:;_
1ero.HcE amen-t BANIEALQRE n’r.vnA.6.12oo9T;x;z 3¢’vQU}s.é;H% V

me: ORDER N0.H<.'iE ~,mi.6;'3;'2bo9
ALL PASSED BY THE R§§"$P§)HDEI€'i" …1sto.35; vmm
ANNEXURE8~C, D, E FTO PETITION, ETC.
mg.g.§u..g79?~3es9§ 1' 3V§Q%"v%',9.;4;T:

” 2:2

3; o suazagswmpa. 4*; YEARS,

. V “3 E’1~m.Ie m

ma.wA’r.-{am ‘}na:«1 ;::QuR1*,
“HIGH cou’R*r.B1m.1:a11ras.

DR 3 R Aamm:>z;Aa.v’E’Enm.
BAHQALQRE-sac am.

‘A H KODAND”ﬁa.RAMA. K,
‘ 1.3,! O”–.E!UﬂI¥AP?’A, AGED ABOUT 54 males,

w<:RxmGAs SENIOR ASSISTANT IN

'V "V _ " Kgatmrxga IHGH courr,
" EEIQH seam EUILDIHGS,

DR 3'j_129'A:£aEnKAR VEEDHI,
EAl§GALORE~5€:0 cox.

” ksmvmm K.

3}’ O KEMPEGOWDA,

é ms!) ABOUT 54 mm,

WORKING A8 SENIOR ASEISTANF IR
KIHRKATAKA mm: COURT,

HIGH C-OIERT BUILDINGS,

DR ﬂ R &BBEDKAR VEEBHI,
EA.KGAI.ORE—560 001.

JAYARAMA HAYAKA 8,

S10 SUBBANAYAEA

AGED ABOUT 40 3%,

WORKING A8 E?-EIVFIOR AS8I8TANT IN

ICFLRNATAKA HIGH COURT,

PIIGH COURT BUILDING-8,

me E R AMBEDKAR vmnnnw V
BAHGAL€)RE–560 om. ”

mtormrz mum P,
ago X FAD ;

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, “_ V
WORICENGAS SENIOR Bin. ” ‘ ”
KARNAYAKA HIGH COURI’._”», –.,

mcm coum’ Butxuqmas, ‘ 1′ V ” % ._

BR B R AMBEDKAR VI:’.ED?i§II;. *
BANCEALORE-560 0011. ” ‘
MKNJU1%’1’KA 3iHE’1,’1’YM.R;~v”‘V-. ‘ ”

sfo l£ R 1?m~.;€J.f!. SHE-‘I’i”Y, ‘ ”
AGED 55 ” g »

HIGH CD333?» ‘V

HIGH ..couR:’Eu11.p”mGs_, ”
DR B R’15;;1g§I££>K;*:.R’vE1BDHL
“aANGAZ.ORE+36G. ham.’

‘ » am cxmnmanaavama,

AGED ABGUT YEARS,

‘ i..s3:om;1r¢GA3″‘8Emon ASSISTANT Is’

mar: comm,

A ” ” V _ “H1GH~Qo’;rRT numnmcs.
“;31:::..g 23, 2-.msr:nxa.R vmmnm.

Bsmgaionm-5m 0-oz.

4.’ ., B R,

E5,-“O 8 RAHAIAI-I,
AGED ABQUT 39 YEARS,

1′ « wommas szmon ASBIBTAM’ RI

IGFLRNATAKA HXGH COUKI’,
HIGH COURT BUILDINGS,
DR B R AJEEDXAR VEEDHI,
Es’..ﬁ.NG:ALORE~56O 001.

ANTHORY KUHAR,

3/ 0 IIIIRUZJAYAPPA, AGE!) ABOUT 5 1 YEARS,
WORIQNG Aﬁ SENIOR ABSWTAW H?
KARNATAKA HIGH CGURT,

HIGH COURT Bunmxaa,
DR B R Anmsnmn VEEDHI.

BANGALORE-560 em.

1:1. KAJA1il.’UNIRULLﬁICI-IAN, , .. – V
sgoanwnnuumnzsmn Anoufrss – . «.
womulmms smmaxnsagswawsm A ..
KARHATAKA HIGH ooumf, ‘ . ‘

HIGH COU1?I’BU1I.Dm’G8,*.._ ‘ _
DR B R AEEDKAR ”

BARGALORE–56£} 5:31. _
~ – V .A PETITIONERS
{ BY 3121 HAN.J’lJHDA.REDDY,’ SEI+ﬁQR.CC)UN8EL
~._F’=!3R 55121 REEIBEN.-EAQOEE’. )

15333

1. THE’Hs_:mBL}3 CHIEF JUSTICE,
a_HIGH COURT <3F'i!.aiaUs'rAKA,

HIGH ce;3UR'if£%UI1,D-11Ic38,

DR. B R AliBEz')3E{.ﬁR*~YEEDHI,
BAHGALOFRE-._~5€=0 G91,

" " REP BY-»I.'hi"8'REGE$TRAR GENERAL.

_ "2; *mE'%'gEG.4 ism """ "RA GENERAL.

~ ._ ..:1:m1%c'::a_u12'r or KARIIATAKA,

– _ i-z.1G:1’cc;zm sumnmes.
13.313 3: gumnnmn wsmnm.
a_.+uxcmmar:-5ae om.

-V REEPGNDEHTB

( SR1 BABAVAPTRABHU 8 PATEL, 3EN1OR COUNSEL

” FORR~16s2.]

THESE WRET PEFTHON3 FILED PRIEYING TO

DECIARE THAT THE HIGH GGURT OF KARHATAICA

SERVICE (commons <31? SERVICE M5113 Rmcmrrrumrm
{:1 Anmnnnmwn RULES, was mmusxmn VIDE
Normcmnon NCLHCE 22112009 DT.29.'?.2009 (VEDE
ANNEXURE–.A) is so FAR As rt REIATE8 To THE CADRE

op saczncm amczns. as _
UNCON8'I'I'I'U'I'IC)HAL AND COHSEQUEKFLY mm _ '
was aam AMENDMENT mr Igarkrgncn' (')"'1i"=_ $)I'v*._ "

CERTIORARI, ETC.

A
3&5: ”

am mmsn, V

5; 0 ANNAPPA, At}:§z3.Aac;::%r

sm R M mvnmmm» % if ” .V ” ”

am Lfg’£f$._J5E”JNIL3W;fsM!, 15631) 46 make.

‘

3; 0 ‘AGED 44 mus.

sat P 3: s1;~It31it«3<§wI)A,
s10–m'rE mmvmawm,

% 1. was AEOUT 49 mm.

_ ‘xi HUDDU MOHAN,
_ ’31 an ;m12Asn;Hn,naU12THv,
~ :x:3~I.1f:_r:: 47 mm.

331.
91 0 mzwneovhn

_ ~ VAGEDABOUT51 .

1 ‘ ¢ 912: namxmvazan H,

H S O LATE’ EGOWDA.

‘ EANA8
AG D ABOUT 43 YEARS.

SR1 L K SHIVAHNA,
3} O KADUVEGOWDA,
AGED ABQUT 39 YEAR$.

SR} G HUNIKREHNAPPA,
S,’ O H GAL A,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.

smnmmsmcmmo, M
3:0 mxsrmamo, AGED AB§3U’I’_ﬁa ‘

512: QHANAMAYAH K, _
am LATE KRISHNA Rﬁnxsxf,
AGED ABOUT 42 V’ 5

am RAVIKUMAR
$10 VEERAYYA, AQED $2

31213 K mnarn 1 — ~
3; o 3 K ms’:§_:RA:sr9A c;:.:aurnp.1§,._
arms 4o=:ma33. A V ..

3121 ._ ‘ ‘

‘3%;'”<::' 40 mans.

8350 AGED ABOUT 41 YEAIE.

~ . am ﬁ’K.1:iI8H.NAf”PA; :

3;’ O AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.

“$5151-mama KHAN,

_ “:3; {>.raa;A:.;=:EL ULIA KHAN,
A “M’.’§I§D 5330? 37 mans.

ALL WORKING A3 EEECOND DIVISION ASSISTANT,

, 3?, THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

J 20.

. SR1 K GQPAIA,

Si O K P , AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS.

am: ALIHULIAH mm,
3; <3 mm ZIAULLAKHAN,
AGEI) mom 35 mm.

SET ANEE8 FATEIMA.

W] 0 MD AYEJATHU1-IA,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.

22.

24.

2?.

%:a:%

ems SUNANDA. % T ﬂ

9110 H 9 SHASBIKUMAR. AGED Aaouflﬁ % ‘ ‘

SMTPRRALINA,

Wm H L LQKESH, AGED A.ézg3U’;*.3;>fivvi-:a;iaA3.’\\\ . ~ A’

snrrn samsvamxaszm, _ V;
310 R VISHWAPRA8ADi_ﬁGED AB{)__U’£’_ ‘

sax P
s; 0 N Pnnvanmgm, AGED–lLj3§}tIT 43 YEARS.

am LEEIA idB, ‘A ._
W19 H GVKAVEENKU *
man m3pz;’r 27

‘.4

am. gﬁanrmivﬁ, .

3; cs c;

sax I
“:3; <7 BASAVAHYAFPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS.

s1irRoo§A1.A;

— , S10 3 RﬁI%{féA8WAMY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS.

;_SR1v R,
_ :5;.o4Ra4ANm M, AGED ABOUT 32 ‘mags.

mo,

3; zzzéjzi mo,
3-i”n’GEI} ABOUT 41 YEARS.

” em? YASHODA,

9170 K S HARASHIHAIAH,

” ” AGED mom 4:: mm.

ALL ARE ‘WORKIHG AS TYPIST, IN
THE HIGH CGURT OF KARNATAKA,

EAHGALORE~ I.

. .. PETYFIOEER8

( HY SR1 JAYAKUMARR, SENEOR COUNSEL
FOR SR1 DAYANAND S FATE. }

‘:”” P {O in .-.1 9~:5a_.-‘gm w..=’S,=:’:

£’s_Ii.12_=

33″.?’ :4 53″‘ P’

fast
.~.

THE HIGH {3OUR’I’ OF IQKRHATAKA,

EANCSEALORE-550 O01.

BY ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL.

THE REGISTAR [ADBZINETRATIONL
THE HIGH COURT OF KARKATAKA,

BA’-‘dIOALORE~560 001.

THE ETATE or
BY rrs CHIEF sncmzzrmzv, A

vmrmm soumm, m 1,%% %* » = ”

THE sram 09

BEPARPHEKP OF PERSGNHE’ . L11 D ‘

AD ﬂVE rempoamssf;-_ ”

av rrs sncnzyxmme, V’

~ %
“am mmya. ~

M 3m mwamz H.

E>’3m%_3 ____ _. s

., §§Ez[‘T*D I2fYAMANGALh H J,
T’ H,

s_a¢r§:-zbvavamx H K,

{A Sm mnnm mo av.

am aamoomm J KARISHETTY,

« 5&1′! G S R{DOPASHREEp

snrr SHA.Lﬂ’€lI 3,

324′: R CHANDRAKAIA,
Sm K 5 1um¢GA1.A,

snrr H R cnzmnammm.

sRI GOVIRDARAJU R.

SRI HAIARAIEC 0,

23.

24.

25.

26.

“” 4″” ~59 4*’ -F-v 4 f.’f~,..€*’ 31-rﬁ Q:–«.0 3′-4…V.9o :4 an 3* .3 3-4 av 2- 9 😮 53′ ?’a

50.

am axxaummpm

SET BHARATHI K,

snrr souameva B A.

SHIT TANUJA RANI,

SET LEELRVATHI 3,

9.121 M MADHUCHANDRAQ

sax EBATHIBH mm 1* c,

sax 3,5″

sm HANJUNATH 8} ‘ ‘ _ _

Sm pnavmzn K;:maRfc,V ” ‘ _
SHIT A 1 = 2

sat at 4 ”

smf mayamxﬁxnn.

M 4, 331 mp 3.1;”

_syE:§”1m3.z;=z:M.UR.xEHmaan,
vﬁsnnmva N,

s1a*i*Lj*;r:::=:z¢A C. B,
31:1-ubanswamva N,

” SIDDAKAGOWDA NAGESHAPPA ANAJI.

SMTRAIINIKP,

‘ am BAIAPPA V BETAGERI,

SEEK’ RAHAEAI NAIR,
SM’? ‘FHEJASWIIGI 3 N.

SR1 RAGHU 3.3,

SR1 RABIES}-I P C,

SHIT SULOCHANA,
SR1 M SHIVAKUHAR,

IL
5*’

us
1″

Ln
5*”

an
.9′

res?-‘§§~’§3~’T°7~’§’3’73r’3’s”§>-%$’3’a$&2&E3.’3-‘%”6éG’:3

an
59

{H
3″‘

an
E9

on
P’

am snmu How.

3121 smnazmamsuwsn G PATEL,
am 3 mm K.

gm 3 K SHRUTHI,

31:: Y nmxpxumaze.

Sm’ R MANJULA,

SET K M

am YAsHoI>Ha <3, _

am' 3 €'3AYA'1'HRI',VM ' '

SHIT 3 Brmmmi; – If V

3121 cyst 2

mMﬁEmwmMwmUf'

ﬁHVWwEmwEi %
smvmwmmmmmm

8RI _N 15 REvé;.i2¢.a:'r-mwna,

, SK: mm M Ii.

2 B

“3Im§ 5a_ R pmsmna xumm,

— I PREETHI,

arm; 15: 8U’RE3HA.

«gm :1′ s CHANDRA,

” ..gjz<1A R $RIHATI-I.

SR1 D BJRDARINATH R4350.

SR1 MANJUHATH BEAT,

SR1'. K V SATISH REIJIJY,

SR1' HA.LI.J'WAI.A LEEARAMA APAYA,
SR1 U Ii! Hhliﬁf-I,

SR1 PRAKASH '1',

SET SMTRA K.

SET KAVITHA S,

85.

€’Ia’¢”G
:4 .=~s4r.4=-§-‘3s33′<':3$%$3~"

~a
9°

:90,
_1'é-1.

«._i”a’.:.

1’95.

. 106.”

V. ” ‘T132,
‘ 165’;

109.

‘ 110.

111-

112.

113.

114.

am GIRIDHAR s, ‘

SRIB s rmcmzzam,

SR1 smzsmmvnsn,

sm vxmrrm 1: 3,

am HAMSA v,

am mnuzaerxa 1.,

am’ KALINI 12. § _
sax MALLIiWATHi_lEU<3:HLGAC)'I€,V_ ' ~- . _
sm sarvmmxm 5 % '
SMT G ' ' .

am’ cg-Fsﬁajgm 3 V’
an; :«:.mn*qV_1_s; R, 4.; ” ‘ V .

_
.s:m sU1~jt3aJ§I1:}4A~<:,_: VF "

em vAsHo13Hh.–B ;* ._ '
am BHAVIKATII,

:§}RI_1i'1'5;iUKARADHYA 3 I6',
,1 ngmigappa Laxaxopm,

3 JABIBIATH,
am sgaxwa C 1!,

{sin vzsmmranaaeoun FATE.
am GEE'?!-IA R c.

3121 QURESSH MURNAL.

8-RI RAMA}?-JANEYA H,

am arnnxacom,

sax mmnmauurmv c,
Sm Mourmrsn M,

an: NARIJEESHKUHAR G B,
an: smrrmaa c,

115.
I16.

11?.

I18.

119.
I20.

I21.

122.
I23.

124.
I25.

126.

127.

am’ Rsma H,

am R. 3 anvmm,
snrr m K nmcnaum.

snrr :3 mmvmn EM,
312: G at vmawmm,
SHIT Umm SALMA.

Sm’ M DEVILKA,

3141? R MALATHI, .

31:21 E R MAHESHWARAPPAQ

am P 3 PAI3MA’Q_}’i’?I-IY¢’_VA « A’

am’ VEEHA G and, A ‘ V _
am’ ”

am mawam

am” %

. mam; HUBBALLI,

– M 6-

–. ., em? $OmEYA;-

3$;l£’1’__A T};m22,r..w;a.

“*mE4R2raponnENrs AT 3L.No.5 To 132

A ” ‘V V _ ﬁ¢.LL”MA..IOR£5, ALL ARE wcmmce as

” Dnimox A33I8’I’A.N’1’3,
HIGH. COURT’ or KARHATAKA.

001.

” RESPONDERTE

u ” ‘ ‘A = (3? am maavapmamr 9 mm, BERIOR covnsm

FOR R-1 80 2.

‘ – sm 5 V PRAKASH. ADV. ma R-96, 93, ms, 123.

am mmnraunm N M, mv. 903 R493. was. 112,
100, 101 & 123.}

THESE WRIT PETITION8 FILED PRAYENG T0 QUASH

THE NOTIFIGA’I’IOH H01-ICE 221]20ﬂ9 DT.29.7.3{)09 mg
ANNEXURE–B SO FAR IT RELATE3 TO ITEM 30. AT

-$7

SL.HO.15 i.o., paouomon or am; AND ~
cmaan en mar amazon ASSITANT <1:-<:}1«_rc.:2~..1s2§m1':n".–..1:'«:'I.'.<:. " –« .,

THESE Plarrrrzons COMING crsj'

mar, THE comm' MADE it':-m:_mLLcwmG:
9——§R
A3 common involved in all
these of by this

common .

2. challenge is to the
(by way of Amemimentn]
aubstiﬁxtpd Rakes of High Court of

of Service and Recruitment)

_’ and thc petitioners are. ﬁicved by the
. qualificaticms by way af :1? in reapact

{Sf aonﬁé ‘cé1t¢gories of posts and law day-ea in raapect of

A. of posts anti these changes bemg’
‘ ‘isiiiéotittztecl by way of the amendments ts the existing
Ruhs:{rem’ui’£ment and hence the attack is directed

against the proviso and the e.-xplanation to the amended

Rules. },

-18

3. Writ Petition ﬁes. I1???-1182712010 arc by the

petifmnsara wlw joined the services of the Respr_:ii%é:x;t

High Cam-t as Group ‘D’ Enztploycm and _

:9 Second Bivision Assistants/’I’ypn’ ta as ”

the post of First Division

aggrieved by the proviso V1;:2 tI1e420 O9

they have been required to’ al’ any
Unwem’ ity aaatahIist;g’§gi~.1y forts:
the next lmh’ at post of

4. +633-4722×2010 are by the:

Aaiiateﬁxjﬁqaxxd th:.-‘u- p1-emotion to the next post

= Assistant (FDA) is under threat, as they

to poaews a dww ﬁram recognised

, Writ Petition Hos. 22155-$134/2010 31% by the

Sttzmgraplwra. Judgment Writers and Scnior Judgment
Writers and the’n- grievance is that, the Sizanogmphars

areaborcquiredtoposaeasadcgreefromarecowﬁod
University to move 11:: the post of Judgment Write;-:1’ and

the Judgnacnt Writczrs, in turn, are to
degrvae and 50 aka the

poascss law degree to move :;n ;’5é:§wt_i:-jf.:

Assistant Rgistrar.

5. Writ Petition ﬁgs. by the
Second Division ixmamuch as.
Petitionezu 8 Igwsistarlts and
Petitiongrrai ;§:%jtsé %MsLi§a they are am
posisegaa :49. $21 to the next post in the

35966-36032/2009 are by the

.’ ‘ ﬁrm a recogxiaed Univemity tn wave
on ﬁfth: post of Second Division Assistant.

‘% Writ Petition Bios. 35*r97-36896/2009 are by the

Senior Assistant: and they have to poazmss a dmree

ﬁvm a rewgnised Univmuity to be eligible for the post of

Section Oﬁiccrs. 3″; /

-“T7

9;. in Writ Petitions 1179’7-1132172010,

mus Rajesh is reported m be dead and

Sri.S.G.Bhagawan had ﬁled

petition agents’ 1: him abapeu,

abatm against the mid Rasfiigfident [ ‘V

19. In the batch «pr j%;>ggemon ‘ff-‘:A:s’§’ 4683-

4722/2910,  ms1gned'
the scrvkxgs    ﬁom the

services

11. elcmcmtmy facts, the

V’ _ A In be rezﬁerned tn.

‘:2~.% batch of Writ Petitions mfermd to

petitinnen seek qua,uh1ng’ ofthe prams’ 0 as

« kjaubaaiumd at Sl.No.14- in Column No.4 of Notificaﬁon

HCE muzmg dated 29.07.2909, winch’ is at

‘Tizkﬁ-‘A’at2drefcrrodtoaatheHighCourtof

Karnataalm (Sarvioe Canditimu) Er”! Amenclnsrimt Fades,
2009 and 81130 to quash Order No. HCE 307/2009 dated

18,8.2GO9 pranmﬁng Resporuienm 3 to 58 as First

Division iiasiatanu as pct Annexure — ‘B’

Respondents 1 and 2 to mpaeitigr V

Pmzitioners also for promotion Afﬁat. ‘

13. In Writ Petition m%%%%221ss.;g:21%a4; sthe V

petiticrtuars have V am mm
Amtmdment Rulna, pubmmd in
the per A.nnexure-

B) and me’ Him 307’/2009 dated
cake to quash the
Neﬁﬁcaﬁoﬁ 2-mtj dated 28.5.2009 insofar as
the qualification to the posts of

Writers and Senior

neLu:f’ sought in to quash the promath nu

‘ Reapondcnta 3 to 13 as per the Notiﬁcation at

— ” – ‘G’, ‘H’, ‘J’ and ‘K’.

15. The ﬁzrthcr prayer sought in to declarc that

stipulatioxz of competiﬁvu tent to the pout of Judgment
Wrizscm and Senior Judit Writers ix: the Draft Rule:

and to declare the quata restricted in Senior Judgment

Writers to thc post of Assistant

and without any basis

promotion to the posts Senior
Judgment Writers on the basis

sf V .

16. 2010, thc
of the proviso to
where the qualiﬁcation of
the proviso at $139.15

. No}? and ta quash tho order Ho.
at Armature — ‘I3’

. to 130 as First Division Assistants ml

the ms: of the for promotion to

A. post.

17. in Writ Petitiaon Nos. 3721347249/2009, the relief

sought in to quash Notiﬁcation No. I-ICE i221f2CO’9

dated 29.7.2009 (Annexuro-B) so far as it patains no
SZ.Ho.15 i.e., promotion of Second Diwﬂnion Assistant

3%”

and Typists to the cadre of First Division.

to quash the order of pmmoﬁor; at »s¥i”fa r asV_V K x

it miates to promotion of Rap-o 11dc:.: 1ts. .

to d:rect’ Respondents-‘I “”2 2 1’0

petitioners by
bamma. Anomer its Respondents-
; and to the
zmjggf and Typim.

13. . mwrig ices. 36797-36-SDGIQDOQ, the

‘p§titir.~nara vvavrelworldrxg as Senior Assistants seek a

V the $301: that the Axnendmerzt Rules
‘% Ne. HOE ‘22112009(A:mexure–

an sg%;.~..%«ag it relates to the pmmotian to the cadre of

AA ; Oﬁ’:.<:m- as arbitrary, unconstitutional and to

V' * down the said amenximnnt.

19. In ‘Writ Petition Hos. 35966~36032[2009, this

pctitioncra, wm are workirg as Grcup ‘D’ Empicycea,
also seek quaslﬁng of Notiﬁcation ﬁe. I-ICE 221/T2009

L»

./<'

dated 24.2.2009 (as per Amm:-mo-A) so_.A4″fa1″:

axnezndmsnt brought out at S1.1′{¢r..19’i:1 u u

refe4’r1ng’ m the post of

arbitrary, of

Orders No. HCE 3/2oos %L¢:aA§ad_A%» HCE
8/21309 dataed nag: it relates tn
Respondent No.4 passed by

ﬂ . Rpmﬁeﬁi wézaei I», ‘E’ and *5″

ans}: 2 and 36 to redo the
Division Assistant by
ooz:a”£::;jé:-sag petitioners in tcarxns of 1973
E23119; to the Anumimm: Rules of

~. have been: ﬁled to the Writ Petitions by

1 and 2 and athar Rmpondents who have

A. haw: not filed any objections in all these
% except Respondnmtn 101, ms, ms, 112 and 113,

who have ﬁled objection: in Writ Petitions 37228-

37249; 2009. 3″

./.2′

21. I have heard Imrned oounad
parties and aha perused
Rcapomenm 1 and 2, ma t’tr¢tsgwg

background, which nece:§;a’itgtaed””$Itt–

Amendment of 2009 by
in the proviso aid and aiso the
records gzgm-dad to tha
in queatitm. in
these

Has. 46834722] 2010

11797-“32:?}%;§o§9, at the outset, submitted am. the

pf possessing a di by the petitioners,

~. cnterxo-‘ ‘n and before the 2009

were bx-cught in, the poaitian. earlier as per

A. , was that the petitiomra were not required to
A’ a a at qu&¥1ﬁca’ tison for considered 133

the post of First Division Aasintant. As the promotion of

these petiﬁormm is new aﬂmted on account sf the
rcsquirerncnt of dwne qualiﬁoatinn, the pctitkaners aim
lose in terms uf the mnnemry beneﬁts, which wtxuid

k
3*.’

have accrued to them. had they beam prox2*A.;<;;;=.'<'vi
1973 Rules. He, therefore, suggmtpgd "' V
be considered far Tia:

Respondanta 1 and 2,
be in force all these’ years in

the changes an pat not open to
Respondmits .1 shall
not be it is argued
that 3.’ from taking a
which and prevailed
duri;:1gVVV:ti1eV and odd. As such, the
airuck dawn.

in the objection sfatemnnt 515:! by

. and 2, it is submitted that the abjection

‘xiii; silent, as m the ::nterm’ ‘n adopted in

_’%::«..:.’z read to the new mquiramem of degree being

insisted upon an th¢ pctitionnm and, as auch, the right

of the petitioner: to be canaide.-.red ﬁat pramntion in

talmn away.

57′

24. It is cmn argued by an S.G.Bkxagavani.A4’§:a:i

raa.d1z::g’ ofthe explanation tn ‘ “‘

clear that the pcrmisaian ti:-. u:;w:’¢’p

examination 13 mt aumxﬁaﬁgz 2 L’

requirczd to obtain ‘the and.
theereﬁare, uhm of the
z’equ:r¢men’ 1: ttm grant
of of the Chief
Justice: or may not grant
Rules are agaimt
14 Constitution of India. By
retrospective eﬁiact, the

promotion has been darned’ .

V counsel SriS.G,Bhagavan subxnittad

.’ ‘ ‘ of power by the C1’&2fJuut.i:ce has to be

vit.-xt’s’§§EL.iz1tba1?g,trtefthclawiaiddownbytP1eApex

in the cases reported inﬁm 1993 SC 935 as wall

an me 1993 so 1079.

25. has rsgardu the principle of esmppel is cancaerned,
reliance Tm placed by the peu’tionera’ oounaei on the:
decision reported in AIR i2{)i0 SC 3125. It 33 contended

jg,»

that Raaponclento 1 and 2 caxmot turn

petzitisamra than beneﬁt ofgeuh1g;’pru:j1t:€inﬁ.t¢’*tfje

far the petmonm rims.r>§:a:e§ie§:_ej%«§i§g3.Vrzzzzss-s4;2o1o
argued 113 has a
law and mm is no
ﬁn by the Judgznont
ma um degree by thcxxn and
mm and also havmg regard to the

my the Judgment Writers to get the

K ” Apartﬁ’ozntheabava,i1iI wnmzidad thatrmnyof
‘. ‘t.’rhéSt%phm~oa:*eove:-theageofﬁoycarsazxditia
muintninthednyﬂn-timmtnnhtamahwdagzeemwd,

msmntbuewmbemmxmbememﬂn
qua.1&f:I::n prescribed and the object m be nchtavad,

and the proviso to the amnndad Rules.

mum: of Arts’ Ian 14 azﬁ 16,of,__t:he ”

Irxiia.

23. It is further
counsel that time
inasmuch as the sent to the
Governor the Governor
without; thcreaﬁer. thc
naught to be achiswod

subxnh aion made by learned semlor
nnl is am, the Draft Rules were

publﬁaed in the Gazette and the preamble to the: Dmﬁ

no published, reveal that the appmvnl of the
Gcvemor was obtainod. But, in the objectiom ﬁled by
Respondents 1 and 32, it has chaarly been admitted that

thcDraftRuiaaw<:renotapprowdbyth¢Govm+mrand
theyre-.majz1edon1yasDrafiRukas.

/3%:

counsel s1-1. S.P.Shan1mr argutxl, that, & ‘

force, then, 1973 Ewes iéfgxzgl .thE:aé

about the am¢ndm¢r’1f§f’tp aeurmot but up»

heldiniaw.

31. It git” senior coumeai

eanditiona cannot be
a1te1{¢dV_i::xnicif¢«§ixr§§s;..:_:”B.£éreoser, met an the glam:

& gmmimg fm’..A.} %%%%% Egatthehw Wiﬁmutha .

V j*, as non-graduatna cannot obtain a law

the new Ruin, brought about by way of

amexgiizncznta, therefore, are not in conformity with

” , iﬁﬁﬁcleu :4, 15 and 21 ofthe Ccsnatitutian.

32. It is also aubmittcd by rm Learned senior cceumcl

that,tl1e1’eisnadirect:-acruitmenttnthepoataof
Asaiatant Court Oﬁccr, Court Oﬂioe.-.1′ and Section
Oﬁoeratxdnolawdagz-ee%a:simistaedupez1ﬁ:rthezsai:i

feeder posts and hcncc, requiring the

to chum the law degree is, mama, M’ ‘

ciiscriminatory.

33. The next argumcnt
3 to 24- have which
thereﬁam, in law, in
respwtgﬁf #3636 print to the coming
am the old Rules of 1973
ncw Rules. Und-at the-ac:
and expiazmtian substituted

‘ As such, they are liable to be
~. and the promcztion given to the:

Reliance was placed in support of the above

submiasions on ttm deciaitms reported in {zoom 1 sec

505, (199731o sec. 419, AIR 3.991 so 295, (19a3)3 SOC

234, (2003): me 161 and AIR 1990 Sr: +05.

:1.

…p

35. Learned Setzim’ Counsel Sri

appearing for the V

2+9/2009, whjia adopting tbﬁ-.Aau}§§1;:#iaséi<3_:'3i%

learned counsel Sri

counsei Sri S.P.Shar_11oa.r, arﬁtzmmm
by contending as f§Iin_§isr.

35. ;m (2), the
viggg proviaso to the maid
in “touching upon the salaries,
,0; pension, the eondi&m of

sséggviées, n§a£a¢1yH,__A«’.promoﬁor{ has got much more

the words used in the said

~. exhaustive but are enty z’ndi-native £11

as promotion given in the employees also

V n a bearing on sahuy allowaneca, etc. as such,
‘ Bing quBhﬁm’ V tion Ear pcramotion under the

: amxdezd Rub wouid require the approval of the

Gownsrrncar and, as no such approval has been obtained
from the Govecrnor, the Rulea 13%, therefore, cannot

afand tha taut of law.

‘W.

4/2,.

£3

37′. Apart from the abova, it is
senior counsel who is

xezmmsm Bar Council, that,

lax} dcsgree by me 1:34:-.11’t.it§ri:”;«*a.:.V’§*ssir(;I:cr<V§ . t'.a on
obtaining law §'¢mseV:ana the
eﬁgiioiiity crimzrion. in the case
of 1:332 peﬁuaigm, it will be well-
nigh ﬁg to have a law degree
9123.,-~41: the prescription of a
"by the judgment writcra is
the said proviso cannot be

accordance with the provisions of

Same" 2- Counsel Sri Na.z1]unda' Raddy in

of thc petitioners in Writ Petitions Nos. 3595:5-

VT%?$tEO32[ 2009 submitted that, as far as Gmup 'D'
empioyeas are canoe:-nod, as per the 1973 Ru]:-:3. 50% of

theposm of5DA waste be filled upbydiract
recm.itxam1t and 25% was ear-marlmd for Group 'D'

emphyees, who had passed S.S.L.C. mcaminatrinn. But,

-17:”

now. under the ammded Ru1m.wh51e K

by mm Recru1t.me1’1t’ ., in respect of

posscaaion of a dzgme by Gréup« . V

irzaished.

39. It is timwre a.t’g’ued ” V

qualiﬁcatzinn for post is 7*?!
Standard, the % ‘whom are 7&1

{Standard dsagree within

the aznandad Rules
” __’um~ea’ acnnble, irratioml and

bemg’ éV1 3 1V1§,,¢aqzti1t1.AV’ the Rules will have to

of Conaﬁmﬁonal provisions am

:% the petitinnma to he cnorzsidm-ad for

~. the pact of Second Divhion Assistant

the petitioners have been made 12::

AA : in the very same post em Graup ‘I3’ cmpbyeea

ewerancl this in counter productive in respect ofthe

cﬁciezncy efserviaoe. It is aiso argued by lcarncd senior

caumel Sri Nazljunda Raddy that the pmucriptinn of a
degree qualiﬁcation is vioiative of Article 14 and hence
the same 73 Liable to be struckdnwn.

40. The learned senior mums} aha

reapect of the patitioners who

who are no be promoted tn

that, the rcquirwt of ” V

Saﬁmr Assistants is,a:ls¢3 tag, iisspecxiof name
of the feeder poa§.. pre.-scribed.
‘*”‘=”‘°”‘-‘= %obi$=*%%~*?*%E1?=t~%%A[J¢¢L&Fe has no
xmxus is aha
The aﬁaresaicl
to be supported by placing
reported in (200614 sec 517

(199426

‘ submm ion put forward by lcarneé
‘ A Sri Hanjunda Raddy is that, Respnmlants

3 ti:e.l§i~c1o not have neoaaaary qualiﬁcation. Yet they are

. and even: as per the amended Rulm of $5139,

their promotion cannot be sustained and if. 1973 Rubs

are ccmsidered, the said respandents are juninzru no

acme: of the peiritiasnaera. Thus, eithcr way, the

promotions to Respondents 3 to 9 cannot be sai4€1,’T’t§Tk2c

in acccrdanoe with law.

42. Learned sum’ r counsel Sri ” 9

Rcspundcnta 1 and 2. at theiziijauﬁsét;

pewer of the Chief

respect of tm wcl1 ;<:.s of
sex-vx:e' oftiw staﬁniitbg d that
Article 229(2) of cm it clear

power ts) frame the
It is only where the

'_ §f£y 'of have got ﬁnancial implications,
2 , af approval uf the Gmernor

– ‘%t:s:2A%§:¢£ otlurrwise. Therefore, it is arguccl that all

Emdlﬂentll brought to 1973 Rules are wiﬂ1m’

~ V-tijxe 13o.wt:ra f the Chief Justice and the Chief Justice.-

get power In mm: the mmhod of me:-umme’ nt and

TV to prwcribe qualiﬁcations. In this contest. :11: rclevaxzt

ru.lesreferredtoar:aRulas?,8aI1d 11.

43. The next submission put forward is that.

the High Court wanwd tn repeal tw

Draft Rules were scnt to the Governor, b

were returrad by the

Rules have not seem the of “t1′;”é*».day

19′?3 Rules holds the
Justina has power the 19′?’$ Rules,
the Rules that are I the p1-mas’ 0

cannot: be vi}9′}£’ii\r§’éf.ih;¢_’C§3ﬁstimtion.

-!4. ‘~._A’a’_ rage’ of approval being
in respect uf prnznotions is

V ti’2;e__§1,1I)miaaion made by learned senior

» Basavaprrablrm Patil is that, no such

ed in rmpect of changa of semen’

” A. , 513-hzaazaa” ion made by the lcamed senior counsel for

1 and 2 is that, jprasczription of

T’ eaucat-ma; qualiﬁcation is permissible: in crdar to

exam: eﬁciexzcy of service, and the High Court
the Court of Recard, it in all ma mom nwmaary tn

exmurethateﬁxziezxcyismainmirxedataliievelsmld itia

ﬁr

with thh objective that the requiramcnt of degree: in
respect uf some of the categories uf the

Iaw degree in respect cxf Senior Judgment

prescribed.

45. Reﬁerring to the ab3’ectinnte},A:ﬁle;a’..;fc11é I

caunael argucad that, in Vic-‘W-9f L.

ob3ec1:n’ ‘ us, there is to ba
achieve’ cl and thc q1’1AAah”‘ﬁcatinm

E_ ..

46. ooumei for R-16 in

‘:9, on his part, argued relying on

% i . agcaatap in (2oo3)2 sec 632 and 2003 AIR

the prwaucriptinn of csriterion for

appointment eta, fall exclusively in the
AA oftheemployer and power oftimjudiciaimvéew
H bc examined only if it ‘ms shown that the ruins

framzaxi are contrary tn the constitutional prosﬂninm.

47′. In the km: of the aformaid contentions put
farwardazadtlmedecisianareﬁenndmhy thekmrzwd

,
$
ti

s¢nir counsel and the learned counsel
the parties’ , the f:slbw1:ng’ poirxtsstrinaeé ‘

.. _ ‘ar’L*iti*a.r5r,

make Rules %229{:z)k%’k4– 51″‘% Van
Ccnsﬁmﬁon ix; reapeqtﬁf service:
of the High ¢anVj§se,uaod no validata
unconstitutional ma ” _ promotinuai
gr . a;;9n3mg»m the same

VI; between prmcribing

and the object

°.af.,Iug’ hm-_ ‘2

.~ ‘ r1 ﬁxed by the prov1so’ to the
of 2009 is nmniﬁestly erramaoun,

uxxxwmaonable, irrational and

1 tory and thus vioiativae of .Art1:cIes’ 14

is of the Conatﬂtutican, when the right to
.. E;-omidercd for promnrtic-.n is held to be a

Whether the requirenaznm menticncd in the
caxpianation to the proviso an arbitrary,
uatzmsasonabie. impracticrabks and lacks rauenal
mxus B.1′);€1 hence viblative ofhrticlae 148516 ofthc:

Constituﬁon?

5. In reapezct of tho vacancies in the:

posm which arose prior to the ”
2009, which Rule is app1ir; alJ§Eé’4’r3fii’I7’3-t:1E#.:§§ gs;%s:-.:»3
orameI1<:1edRu}mof2GG9?'*

5. Whether the 1731393′
retzuspective ;&’a:; qf taking
away the “Rules and
thus the arhitrary,
me am
£4” and 16 of the

7. given pursuant tn the
3 ” _ ma. conacmancc with the well
_ _ est£cbi_ish¢é% of service jurispmdeme?

. _ gf followed in bringug about the

_ Rule-a af 2009 is in accordance with the
ﬁe}; gazablmhed principles and procedurvsa
‘appfiicabk in rmpect ef bringing amcrnzlments tn

* pmmpm rules?

%-w tHo.I:

}48.Ast1’mRuIeuwhichareunxiercha1Iengevre1e

framod by the Chief Justice by virtue of the power
conferred Lltidﬁl’ Article 229(2) of the Constitution, it is
nczoeaaazy to aramim the: said Article and the law laid

_r…v’

down by the Apwr Court in that regard. Afticia.

the Constitution of India reads az~»un;iAer; H ” \’ *

eff-fz’gh Cawts:

(1) Appé>*ix1ﬁt1nE.r’1§s ‘A
sarvanm at’ a «made by
the: ChiefJuatjw–§>ffthe anon other
Judgg-,’ iof; he: may

…. of the State

in such mass as
jibe rule rm persan not

align-:13 r in the court $115111 he

5 » Lappdxntgati’ to ény; oﬁoe commcted with the
;_ oo’aujt oomultation with the: State
Cemmiuion.

Subject to thc provisions of any

made by the Legislature ofthac State, the

z “s§:rnditiona sf service of oﬁ’1eea-s and servants

ofaﬂighoourtahallbcsuchaamaybe
prescribed by mien made by the Chief
Jmstice::ftIaeccur£c:rbyavan:xeo£l:na1’Judge
or oﬁoer of the court authorised by the Chief

Jzmticetomaineruieafhrtkmpurpose:

—

__,..

’32

Provided am the rukzs made H
this clause ahail, ao ﬁx: as they rcléiftn
salaries, allnwanxaes, or
mm the appromlal of

49. Sub-clause :2)’ of cxém that
the Chief Justice ivu”” by Rules
the cot1di1:iona.;>f ifzzf :31′ um

I-I:gh’ ‘__… any law made by

“”” ” ling with the aformaic!
.V same with Article’ 309 and

fgxfticlsa Juntioc M.Rama Join (as has

‘Services under the State’ -198?’

A “_E:ii§£:s:§ 1.,:.’at::.j§)s;ge-334, has observed thus:

“‘ a comparison of Article: 309 with Articles
“@445 and 2:29, we: find that the two matters
via, {i} t and (ii) conditixarxs of
sewiztewhicharadeaitwithjointly i:x1Az’t’nr:1e
309 are separately dealt with under clause!»
(1) and :2) respectively of Articles 146 and

229. The power of Parliament and Status:
lcgislature Tm c.:onﬁn¢d to ragummg conditicns
ﬂat’ am-xzizze and on matters relating to

DJ M”

=4′, -.-

racmitmmt power is exciusivcly

the Chief Justice.’

50. Therefore, the pew» or n*;e%%’star.¢%A%[£¢

legxkhtinn in regard to of * L’

High Court stag’ been “on Justice
and thus the 229(2) are to be
held as subor:§i:Late:1eag§,§\£9;1i6n,”‘»__’ %V

51. As;-; the approval of the
submzk ” ‘ion . sum’ r counscl Shri

JayakL1mar even in respect of promotions,

“(if is 1′}.¢O¢’-O$8.1′}’. On the: other

‘ senior mumel Sizri Baaava Prabhn Patil

‘– that the apprmml of the Governor

only in xmpect of those matters which are

% ” * : mentinnod an the prtwiso to Arms 229(2)
eventheﬁp-ax Court, in the were ofM
T Vs. The Accountant General, Asssam as Nagaland,

reported inAIF:’ 1971 SC 1350, has hefd that Ciause {1}
mad with Claum (Q1 of Amish 229 oonfm-a esgchzsixm

power not only in the matter at’ appointzccuenta but aka

/&’:I”,–”’

…

with regard to prescribing the conditions of

oﬁcers and servants of a High Court by

Chief Juatioe: cf the Court. ﬁgs is .3t1?.:;§«:§i:_:§ ‘any! ~ ”

Iegisfatinn by the State Legnllatirgre hug ‘saﬁzy in’ raw;

conditiaena of service. In’ am: may gr
even the Qialatum cannot pcswars
ormferrcd an the fl). The
approval of matter of
Rages, is as reiatt: no
All anther rulm
in af do not require his
V the approval of the

GA rerun {if prcmntions, therefhm, is not

_ “&§v’iaag&i.«’by to Article 229 nor data the

the Apex Court can be construed as

‘ A permission cf the Govcrrmr man in mspcct

of relation to promstinn.

H Whcther the said power can be exercised by {lass

Chief Justice disregarding the constitutional proviaitms

came up far consiciaration befom the Apex Court in the

case of H_C.Putmswamy & «others Vs, Honfffe Chief

Justfae oficamazzzxa [AIR 1991 33.2951 and :2’1e%i;éx;5¢::-;%

Court has observed thus at paragx-aph–}.1:

“The Judiciary is th.e~” ‘4 of
cxmstitutional principles §ar_I:1ic_Vh giﬁré if-L * AA
to me. maintenance; ¢f4ru1e”oAf’iaw.
which: far the pmtecti§11»¢f ii S

which are izxtggral ~ of = Q81’ Maia} giiud
politiacai the most
visibie actors in ‘ justice.
‘aw mast pubmy
of
ju§:t;.ic¢ i:§:_ “31:5tz{¢£,:a¢g¢id:x:g§disputed cases. 1:

1 mart than that. Any
~t::f’ the administration cf

jiistiée must alas take acoount

V of the Atqﬁalityi of the Judges behaviour and
,A _.”..;M&.&am mm “my my appear

_ cznly minor aspects of the

V’ ” 3* ‘éxanian cf j11ntioe:, but collectively they

.. not trivial. They constitute, in uur
” ﬁispitaion, & subatantiai part of the mosaic

wﬁch reprwents the ardinary mania
perception af what the Courts are and haw
the judges gr: about their weric. The Chief
Justice is thtt prime fares in the High Court.
Articie 229 of the Constitntinn provides that
appointmrant of oﬁ:em and servants: nf the

fry-

/p.

.75

High Ceurt shall be made by the
Justice or such other Judge at omocr cf ”
Court as may be d:recnad’ by
Justice. The abject of
secure the indepazzdmzcefpf
which canrzot he n V’
unless the authoritjf-_V ti2..V_ap}:$diz1t
stat?’ with complete ovéir in
mm in the cm»; au%sn1f>e.% mm as
imperativg ” ” ‘ absolute

the High

t 0111

W . ﬁe must

o’g=;;__a1 ‘ Wcrrki of ggw, not Q the

Q: mag’ gmaghm. He has
dpty that in carrying out the
functiom, he is actuated by

H and vaiuaw as those of the

_c_.n;l_1’g’ Weneedhardlyaayﬂmtﬂmaewln
are expected to omwe the conduct of others
must rzeoeaaarily maintain a Ivighcr standard
of ethical and intellectual rectitudc. The

‘A

J/’.”

public expoctationa do not seem to be

53. A Dam’ ‘ ion Bcmh of k

Chamegaruuia Vs. High Cfourtizyf

Kat 4633), relying an ths: decvépiori *

has held that, mm 2: chgfxezk _ with
mgard tr; the not in
acxnordance with the records
should have been

% h Chandra Vs Regixmal

(AIR 1993 s.c:. 9353,

held that, every wide power, the

»A has far-reemhixag rapercusaion. has

%’ » magma on it. :1: should he axeztised to

purpose sf the Act, In xagzaxation mama

‘A s benﬂt ami oommzm good, the I-espomihﬂity

graver. It dsmandn purpaseful approach. The

: migraine of discretion should be ahjeciive. Test of

reasonableness £3 morc strict ﬁlm gublic fungm’ :3

ea-ha f

‘P8

It;aa’naanddeciaio w’htoucht.heoo___o

m iusticc. Tn__at which 3 xtvgt fair _

mzmganable. Ami wgt Q” g g

5;; g;mtra_g{ gggﬁ Q is ;@a :_-Itfelees.’ A’

bonaﬁde and in good faith’
gain or bemﬁt to the s2 ipu1d be

55. In the ﬁat

Rcg?;s~F?L*21’§A: ‘ a1 and another (AIR

1993 s.%c.w2Vd;§3,%% m§k?V§p-g’cam while dealing with

Articic .91; has observed that the

‘A ‘iai{‘£:3__s1_.1£pI’s’ ﬁg; angl not heat and the rclevant

«. which is as unxier:

” _ pointed out above. under the
“constitutional acheazue, Chief Justice is the
supreme authority and tha ether Judgﬁ, so
far as oﬁoers and servants ofthv: High Court
are conzammed. have no role to piay an the
adn:1iz1ia1:-ative sicie. some judges,
undoubtedly, will became Chief Justice in

’29

their own turn one day, but it is
under constitutional dincipiine that
in tranquility. Judges have been
‘I’he}’ have
“km:-mite” who have no ﬂew 5;:
having shed a: ﬂnnugh M’
mission 73 to supply not izmit.

is nrzoaasary 89 that lama: d§eéi:~e.to..i-1m

the High Court. é§:*Jnﬂ§1st_:*siﬂe_:2 not sprout
before time.

56. It is in law that
while authority to {ram
as well as cxmdititnns of
Justice is, however, subject
tax the in Article 229(2) itself and
to be wmrcisexi keeping in View the

‘ as expressed by the Apex Court in the

” A came as Wei} as by that Division Bench of

in Chazmegowdeﬁs case. In other wards, the

AA canmt be us-ad to va}.1da’ tc unoonatitutional

‘ ‘ tinn in praznoﬁon chances of persom heionging

no the 3£iI1′}£.5 aateagory.

;’
y
u!

Point No.3 2

57. The next point to he considered is

the rational nexus betwe¢;x….. °’

quahﬁca’ ﬂan] Law Degree, as

af SD53, FDAa,

Senior Judgment
Before I proceed to it. is necessary
at thiﬁ to stood in the
High to be met
_tl%eVVVV§a§mendcad Rubs of 2009.
and amendments tn

2.; gubgﬁmpea £5 of the eariitzr mathod. gr

._::. ef the peﬁtionczrs harm’ , with

Hot-1ﬁr.:a’ tion 1’vIo.HCE 221/2009 dated

‘A ﬁubﬁahcd in the Gazette, are as under:

.. HIGH COURT 0:? KARNATAKA SERVICE
(connmons op semen AND RECRUITMENT’)
zvAm:2IDMEN’I1 RULES, 2009.

: Method of Recruitxnent to the posts of First Division

assistants fmm Sec.-oﬁ Division Assistants and Typiats:

A
‘E

291/

Existingmeﬂzod H __ %
$1.No. Cadre Name of Recnzitneznt auhastiizrzgted in ti2e”;a1’aLce’v.
of “cf

1. Tc: tha Carin: By Emmi tile
of First from the camireg. [cadres SEA;
Havana’ ‘ ‘ ﬂ SD53 ‘9.n¢’:._ ‘Iypu’ ta’: _ 5x:,Vthe”:&’ir1oV’ef
Assistants Typist! in the 15:4 f6~¥3DAs @111!” 4 L’

snag 4

Typdsbsl pp
,.puauihl:;~— _

*i’t’sa5LT’%fﬁ:.”3*’=*~’–«’5:-.’1,+’« 5:1″-
}r3,”veu.*Ii¢a’ to the

oﬁr._2i5Jn of the

<§t1;z::ur.. rmﬁrc: wha

became

.' gmam of that

cnéfc to this
'-data an W'hi1Z'h the
farmer oﬂicial
became a
member
hisfher cadre.

ratio “of ‘w #5:»? (6-

*11sL–«.a-‘6.»
above ”

nlugl}. not he

jgarmnbtina;

“s:a£§re” of A

~ Afusiat-.

‘iimistiaﬁ ._
gxnsdfizig; Prcvided that,
s.21″%ia1 of one of the
above: ntadrcm shall

ﬁat has gimm pxumaizimz

ta’ ~.£hc cadre of First
Assistants}
Clntku, enriicr to
promcrtinn sf the
nﬁcials sf the other
cadre who had became

‘..’.””….’.,”1′. ‘ate ﬁ”u..u.r.”””1’:i.”
became: a. mcmbur of

hinfhcr aadm.

Pravidmi they nhaﬂ
possess a Degrcc fmxn
any Univ ”

eatahﬁahed by I»&W in
India and Certiﬁcate
Course in Computer
Apgxlicatim.

Excpianaiziom: 1. The
present member: who

are warldng .1: First;

Biviniaaz Assistants and
who «in not panic” that
zwquirnd qualiﬁcation,
shall qualify themselves
without aﬂ’ectin.g the
regular wurk, with prior
persnkueion cf Hank}:

the Ch.iarfJusﬁca, wirhizi
a period of ﬁe years,
fairing which they nhnil
am: he cntiticd fez
ﬁuthm pmmatinn.

V —-a)_5phcaﬁn::g;.: , it-35111:: work, with 33110:-

‘ Viicrt; be e.-xxeitled ﬁn-
Qwgﬁﬁcntiatmé further prmnotian.
Tim permission is not
” _ automatic, but subject
“L. “-.v,_M:sst Iaave to the imsereut of ﬁe
” SSLC Enntimtinn. Such
‘.fca;iL_p’.z1cttd§Iythu tnlncawaytixcxightl of
the uczmior nmplnyccu

both. am the p1’eacriBed;–‘ “–wg: rt3v”rzIAed
Basis of a Test that they..«a3;a1I._p’a§3esg
condmsted far the Bcgrnc
purpnae, dim rccngnisagi .9: ‘

and agrarian: 4’ 1,
rccocrda, an; ‘pxcamt
preacrihccl: or ” are ﬁaia’

(he) 83 tin’ .;1o’t_ gmééeaa the”
mcnﬁhneht ” by r1?equ1’r’e¢1″ qgzalﬁcatzion,
aelgctinn_____ ” shun” vthemaeiven
” ‘fen-‘*.w-itixout “a.ﬁ’e¢t:iz1g the

ha1u!ingV___i* of Horufblc
canipgfiiivc ‘ teat C-hicf Justice, within
‘ zyfénxiod nf ﬁve yeazs,

– ‘ ‘ which they $11311

Sccondnry and does not confer the
vEduca1:inn Bnarti umiuc larixrﬂcgcu an the
of equivalmzt junior en»:.p}.oyees. The
Examimﬁnn quaﬁcation nixfsaizzeci
without fallowing the
Note: Pzeferencc above norm: wtmkl not
wﬂ Ere given to be taken into
then: who an-. cunxidemtion, til} they
grauiustnu. Must come within thn zone of

have paused: cannidcraﬁon.

$3. I. ’11:: senior Abte: 1) For seaming
gratis minimum qualiﬁcafurn
axaminaﬁon in prescribed fa:-this cadre
Enainh withfn sﬁptuated time.

Shnrthnnd in the permission may be
ﬁrnteluu; $1’ Hberaﬁy granteti.

The Proﬁciency 2) The peﬁoci af time
Grade pmacribcd for
,Exam*mnt:ima %m quaiﬁxrnﬁnn

weiﬁht ” . ‘

at;-3 whee} F

Method of recnzitxmerlt to the: posts <3!" Second
Assistants from Group 'Dwﬁicials, L' 5 "

I Exiatingmethod .:=¥g;:V"*jm.

81.No. Cadre of Rct:nu’hm:n’t’ .qu.b.~_n:in;tc&*
_ ‘I5: *’*’~’!=*}._=0d… 1″”
.1″ _ t

1. To the cadre {a)5G’Abyd1’ﬁ:¢t
af Secnmi xmruﬁmcgt by 1*t:crnitx:h’.£::i.1′: I

Baum’ ‘ ‘ n sczicctioal for ‘
Asaisfanm calling ” far apvplicaiibn and
applinating. 3 th:

V ‘i£’L. ‘ . ” .3pp}ica.n’!:ﬁ. ‘I31:
1m=~Bna–nu.3. . V VA qualiﬁnatinn
giirect reemitutent
qualiﬁpatinn’ fa: a degree in
1:” ” Scixmsefmtslcommeme

[Eiusimaa Manapment
. he ‘cg d.eg’_ee.¢f a’ “of a mcamised
zgtmgagsajnczti » Ullivcatxity with
af55% in T11: agrcgtz ﬂax
carxtiidatx: bclbnﬁing in
for Gencral catngatry and B.
L minimum of 45% mark:

” . in in the aggregate to
‘ %»€3e’r:era1 Category Ssﬁeclule Caste mzé
2’ «mi minimum cf S¢heduie’I’r1″heo.

A ‘4S%mau-ksinthe
agyegnm ta (la) 30% promxxtsinn an
“”” ” Schulnk: Cumin: the basin of ueniMity-
ami Schedule cum–mc.zit from the
Tﬁhca. cadre uf Group I}
aﬁiciain working in thc
{b} 25% High Caurt

atinn an the Entahﬁxhmcnt and who
iii! of In.-niorit.3’~ have passed tiegraee
cunmneztil: from examination: of
the cadre of recognised Umiremziy
Group D oﬂialn andwhohavepnttinnot
worlcing in the less than two years of
Hkh Court service.

Eatnblinhmcnt
and whet hm: Explanatimzz 3.. “I’h.v.-.
paused degree: pcrcacmt mcmhem who
examination txf are warking an Scctmd
recognised Divininn ﬁsainmntx and
Ugiveﬂﬂf and who do not passes: the

,, ?

‘~ » a1.1a’:;_n.’I$}e

D aﬁciala

who have put in
not less than one
year nfsrxzvicc.

(#3) 25% by
prumutinn thn.

basin of

cum-mcni:

the cadre faf

we:-ki.-ng. u in the’

Esuhlkhmeat ‘

whii *1.a;a»ué”

‘ ‘ &_I;t1Vi’w;:.Ia:it- _

ma,

ha:-ave” in’
. 372311;: cfuqnice’.

:d:Tifalnyeanmcy£

«lag ﬁned

ti}; gnfohibﬁom
want cf

cndxcz cf

poncsaizxg dcgtcc
quuﬁﬁcaﬁnn, the
same shall he

ﬁled up by
zrrmnotina
suitable
canslzinute fmm
ﬂu cadre mi”

Gmnp D oﬁcinh
paucming SSLC
01′ aquhaknt
qlzaiﬁcntiau.

(e) If any vacancy

requimri
81143 jth.eﬁ1″$j%’1?k’9
without ﬁsh:

re:gu]ar’#am’rIi£,’A’:=.z.iﬁ: V’
Hou’bIc–, V

9… pa-128333 –r1f’fn’:

‘£a;Hn§»._which r}:.s,,4.’3,v..a1i.iaa;J1

‘:52: _’ is met
automsﬁ». !:~5v.1: subject

to the §ntei’¢st of the

Iwltitution. Such
pgzﬁ-inaiau shall nut
war tbs light of
uankar cmpinyec.-.u
cine: not ccrnfnr the

‘ “undue privileges on the
‘ junior employees. The

qualiﬁcaiio-:n obtained
without ﬁoﬂnwing the
above um-ma wmzixi not
be when into
cunxidcrniitm, till they
came within the 20116: of
cansidcratiszn.

Note: 1) Fur securing
minimum qunliﬁzmtian
preacrﬂaed for this cadre
wn:hm’ ‘ stigma’ latex! time.
the penniuion may he
Bibs.-rally granted.

2) The perfect of time
prescribed ﬁn” ucctuiaag
nsinimuna qzxaliﬁcaﬁzn
(La. five years) starts
fzmn the chm: of

meant for Group 3] If no eﬁgihie
D aﬁcialn cannot candidate is available
heﬁﬁcdupbyﬁar pmomntinn, such
prmnaﬂnn for vacant post may be ﬂied
wmt of nzitahle up by threat
candiciat: the recxuimzcnt.

531;: shall he

Enzethnd of
recmiunent to
‘tbs: past af
Section oﬁccr
£P1’otocaI}.

53. In £114: objeotsnn ata’ecmen1€.Vﬁ1§§§¢i”

Respondents 1 and me
prascription of in with
a View to imprrowz ar the High
Court and it is an the:

mom

by the learned
‘the: patitioncrs as well as
Rporldenns 1 and 2 anti
racorda that arc produced for

__by the learned senior counaei for the

. and 2, there appae:-3 to bc rm specific

gum’ an to why Degree is insisted in

A. of peracns, who art: in Group-D, SBA. FDA,
” ﬁt:§1mg1°aphers and Judgment Writers, £01′ them ‘ho move

to the higher poet arm) likewise, no specific reasons arc

£ur1:I*x:omingautnwhytheLawDagrmis irmisted upon
the Seniors” Judwm: Writers.

100

60. The nature ofjoh or the duties a85igI1ed:?.€3- A’

categories cf mpkayeea, which are _

by the learned senior murmel

by placing relevant documg:r_1m %%auﬁ¢s<"a£ 'V

the Gmup~D employees tha:; ¢£T 'the
oiﬁoe neat and to
and SUM are organize
the of ﬁles
and, and F1335, the
the job of the: case:

“aéia upon them.

6;. “–‘;i’ap}ne:-5, Judgment ‘Writers and

are coneexnccl, they are

‘ ﬁtﬁfh the work stenography which werk is

” X i-imam by the Hon’bl¢ Judges, apart from

tappah and files. The éutim of the Court

arﬁ Assistant Court C2ﬂ3.cra are that of

the case files aocoréing to the cause list, to

note the stage: of thc case according tn the court

p1~omedingsandieaepaiIthe}awbooksthataz~era¢:eived

101

for that: conduct of proccadings. The: Section

required to scrutinize the ﬁles submitted .

worker as par the promdure pr§a§:r_ibcd._9 ‘V’1″}i;§ ” ” V

charge of on: or mom awficz; t.¥.:§2sé.g;=2?x1_ti;1§’ of , V *

the ﬁles suhnﬁtted by the ‘ In
the letters on flfxc _

52′. F’rom” V’ «sf the aforesaid
categorigzzu’ ﬁrimt’ at the ﬁrat glazzce,
is of.Vw§$r1éﬁ d-:.~m”§by the aforemcntirmed
oﬁcrlais} * not ‘ 1.

_v the a.rg11menm, it was also
‘same times the Sims ml} dz: the work of

V the work of Seninr Assistants and

in turn, will aha do {ha work of

L11<:ewu' " e, the Stenographexm work in

x 'p1'a_oc Q): Judgment wntm and Judgment Writers do the

af Senna' 1' Judgment Writers. Some Semh r

Judgment Writeera are also assgnaed to look aftcr the

work of Assistant Registmra.

102

64. Thus, what ?n clear from the nature of ﬁmrk

asaﬁgncd to the various categories of am}? is t.b,ﬁi§ ”

the wnrk ef same category of oﬁciala is ‘

by the other cataegary of empbyeéi It thﬂag L.

even without possessing

new prescribed under V-Ruisgs,’-vyérlﬁ
Court has gone oxzr’ of
coﬂliflg into force, -greaent Rulca
are of the Half deczadas

the 1;, eate5g <sfi¢$ ' " 'arf ';Vata.ﬂ' have gone on
poasesa£¢a_V%'by prescribed under 1973 Rum

even have been given to Group-D

»A up to the Aasistant Registrar category in

above state of aﬁ?a.1m’ , can it be aaid that

” ” a mama between the objective sought to be

and prescription of higher quaﬁﬁcatimm 31.3.,

DegreeorLawDegrae,a.athecaaemaybe.ashasmw

beer1danehytheamendmantF.’u}asof2{}C}9. Inthia

/jg.

103

oommction, it ia relevant to refar to the Ap¢:r_4G::{uf_’t’aVV

decision in the case of Fbod Carporaztian ofzaaéri _

P:-axaash Sharmaand otI:ers(AI1i’V19£?8 _ ”

56. mg Apex Court in thy: afs “re.;1ic;_iﬁ¢nét§~v_Ac&.A’ ac,

going thmugh the job gr
of employ:-zm. founé ﬁx: pcffdﬁneciviby the
pmom hoiding AG -with the same
war}: as to AG II and
the aha expected
to Ai’~.’:w– and thus thn dutim
Teiephrme Gperatom as
well III to be similar. Taldng note of
were also perﬁanznzing same

‘A ‘:1:1.;tie}«:gsVA«oi*:G:-atduatca, the Apex Court, themfore, held

2 nt incorporating ﬁve years of service’

critmia for non Graduates. as the

~ made by the Amandmant, is vinlative of

clause. The Apex court also referred to

‘ varm’usdecinin:nix1thismnnectm’nandru£adt1mtthe

amendments to the Regxﬂationa making a diﬁhrenﬁation
between Graduates and mwﬁraduaheﬁ in the matter of

j,»

104

promotions of the pests of AG–I and AG-II

equality clause and are, therefaxe,

5?. It is to be merxtisaned ”

ans not graduatasflaw graduatéza»,

work of tha posts hnld af1&~ to
which airaady not
give any irzadicatioti ii’? ‘4 work, or
shmmgraphy :1? is
eacparience itself
In than rqard,
$1′ in the case of Bmsaxerza

Vs. ” Commzttee,’ rcportcd in AIR

be lcolraw into. The Apex Court

»A t1§&.facte of tha case: before it, that the perscna

5f aix years as Seniaor and Junior Draftsman,

” to be conuidcred £01′ pmzzztotion to the past or!’

‘ ‘Héad Draftsman. In the course of tha said decision it

was held that it would be umeasombfa to hold that in

addition to this aonsideraable experience, one: must aka

have the diploma q_’_Lm]5.ﬁ::a::ionT prescribed and therefore

105

A it was not mnaistcnt and cohcrcnt with the

and im abject.

68. The afarementjunad decisi§$1m :.=:g’reg

case: on hand inasmuch a.s, férﬁmr ‘fﬁie

persons holding the posts affsmuﬁ 9.53, and
Scrrinr Assistants f<:'z«' i1L-.:'t'Vt; highs:
cadre of pasta and 'pf has nut
in any way £11e kiigfwr post,
Judgment Writers and
dug xia dictation given by the Judge,

A the draﬁ or fair copy for the

V Judge. In other wards, Stenographers

'A Jtidﬁaen'. t 'Writcrs and scams' 1' Judgmsnt Writam,

Degree] Law Degree qualﬁcatzion are

, tkxzir dutias all these years and possession

afsaiddegreeswou1dmakencdiﬁ'ere1me,ao£aranthe

core work to be diaclmrgod by the St¢nog'aphers and

Judgment W1-ﬁterts and Senior Judgment Writers is

V';

U36

conaartxed. It may be proper for a Reaaarch

tn: have a Law Degree becauaa the nature of .

said Rmcarch Assistant mqu1rea’ _tx5″i,a* «lff _of.: ”

the argumenm addressed by

court and look ta thy: deiisigna
deaasiona in the light at” the ~ men. or
hcr, to enable render
iudgmmta at tha %$te=wgra:=1=ers,
Judit Writers are not
doing Assistant and,
a Law Degree has no
naught to be achieved and

In this connection, it may

_ on; of to rcrfar to the: nature at” work of

Judgment Writers and Senior Judgment

have been rcfarrod at paragaph 1.4 in

W.P.§§_£as. @155» 135/seem and it is rightly mm: in the

paragraph that awmgraphy is a skill or talent
?aequired,iznpmvisedarxciperfectedbya}nyman,aided

and assistcd by basic knowledge of grammar and

control over mcabtﬂary, ability tn cuzmmxct sentences

107

i.c, syntax, command over Language, uxzmlatacij
eduxzational qu.a3.1f’ mations. The art,

paascsacd by tht: Stemgraphera_,haa_ no ‘A V’

all}? 5¢1’W’~’ﬁ” jlxrisI1I*udera’;ue and:

will maka a gcrson a goe?i_’S;mmgra§2i:er Aeju-:£,gmént
Writer or Senior V W:7.J.”l’.i¢_E»3’z’, the

educational

‘?’O. It it has been
the the authtar of
atar¢’VSt<;nographcra, Judgment
W" _ wrimm Paasessing any
3.91.41: ;":»1§t they are: turning out
taking dictation ﬂawlessly and

__thn xnatxerial into draft or fair eopy, to

~. such, the averments made in paragraph

ilﬁ ofﬁformentioned Writ Pctiticns carry substance

AA they have not been mntroverted by

2 r2a§po:x:1enm 1 and 2 in their -zrbjectiom. Therefore,

r'aqEun~.-gxzxsent of Degree qualiﬁcation Easing obtained by

Group 'E', SBA, FDA, Senior Asaistant, Stenographers
and Judpent Writers and Dgee of Law being insisted

/3"./r

1123

on the Senior Juclﬁt Writers has no bearing

whatauever in rmpects of the work to be turmd

the reapeotiw. cawgories f employees.

71. The: Apex Court, in the cage Uf-T,R

V9. Twnilwadtx Water Supp!y

in (1994):: sec: 232, hask’ia.¢xa%%%r1:a£%wru1ekk¢V1§sa;iﬁs:a2a¢n
based on higher eauqa.:sana;%qL5;fa1i5;cgu<or; .pen~;ajasib1¢
but total rmtriotixm go as to block

the chances sf held that

hiator:ca' 1
eauaatsbn_V%and%'s¢éia1 have be be kept in rnmd'

he in consonanxze with Article: 14,

» 2.5 a;A:vxi.§£!.:bf__L§1c Constitution oflndia. mm Apex Court

, of the aﬁuresaid decision ml dawn the

legal propositions with regard to thc

x m;;uc3:;t§;na1 quahr xtation being a basis of cIassif"u':aticr2

' to promotion in pubic sarvice:

'{1} Higher aducational qualiﬁcation is a
permissible basis of ciasmﬁnzation,

I09

aeoeptabiliq-,r of which win dcpezzd an

facts andcircsumstamm ofcach caac; "
(2) Higher educational '

the basis mt only for '
aha far rentrx:t1ng' ' the

{3} Restriction placer}:
the extent of the
chanccs of prqrxaotiot;—« Ta. tiagide this,
extent of rastrLcé:s_n%L_a1:g1; 'i2ami"a1ac to he
lacked into –"'whs3th.ei' it is
.iRea§s-min-_fi’_:_»._;1f§ia§Vj’ are being

72. rewards placed for my
are assigned as tn why the

Gmup ‘D’, SBA, FDA,

A Writcra and LL.B. Degree
Y Seninr Judgment ‘Wribars. Acctordingly,
consideration is answered he-lding that

of higher qualiﬁcations under the amended

explanation has no nexus with the abject

to be achieved.

13.9

Pbint 130.3:

’23. The next point to be answered in _

crit¢nc’ n ﬁxed by the provbo tog; .i’~L. ” ‘V

53009 is mnniibstly aerrornaous,

discriminatory and thus vi-$j_t.e:?.ijre ¢:%mm.=.%4 mi? A

74. It. is the cont»-mtiggn
appearing for the as Well
as lcarnadjwjzérhjei the right to
be mmnadeéga aﬁecned by the
jrherefore, the question
he as to whether the right
to be is fundamental right. and

is asacmd.

V V’ dispute that in Case of all the Gmup ‘D’

sum, FDAs, Senior Assistants,

Judgzznnt Writers and Seminar Judgment

* , no lug’ her or additional quahﬁca’ tion is insisted

;un:ier19’73 Rulesﬁarproznotionto thenezscthigher

post. Now, by virtue of the provisican and the:

explanation substituted to 1973 Riﬂes by way of

I11

amcndmcznts in 2009, the pctiticancm [an the

he) should possess dagrael Law degree 1

them: who do not posse;-as aama:;~cannc'{t; V’

501* pmxnotion. The very fact

also challenged the crdci’£’§ ‘k:1.£.’ prérnﬁﬁan of * L’

rmpondentn ‘3 indigzativa 1’s53t_AA’3§3;I.5id.ered

for promotion.

?6. Prabhzz Patil
“ﬁned DD “vestfxl right of
promntion cannot be.

gig promotion. It is argued
by the fer R-1 and R-2 that mare

of does not give a vested right Ami,

_V »’ the amendod Rules provide for degree
law :1? in ramp-act cf Judgment

same’ 1- Judgment Writers, the petitiomara

‘A campiain that, by virtue of the changes mw

‘ ‘brizught abaut, the changers of the p¢tition¢rs’ promotion
are rendered T’ aaibke.

112

177. The laarned senior comm-.-.1 for Rd and R-3:

argued that, as there can be In vated

of the pramotion. mere cI’1a:’1G¢._to

therefore, cazuznt be magniﬁed

right. Under the said A’v«:§Lmer.:.§ed
Rules cannot be tn of 14
or Arﬁcle 16 of _ When tha
” fof education
and, as such.

the to tha contrary

any force in it.

78. 14¢-dfaw for the afcresaid submissions,

__uEausa1;§ Patzil placed reliance on the

» in AIR 1971 so 1350,5119 1997 so

u – m 2:312, AIR 1974 sc: 1, AER 2995 SC

2609 sc 2497. (200134 sec 433 and AIR 1999

V’ ” 2912. Hence, it is argued by the learned senior

Sh:-i Banava Prabhu Patil that the question at’

hniding the pmvieo and explanaﬁon tn the amixied

Ruins 2009 as uncomﬁtutﬂonal ear violative of Articica

14 and 16 of the Cgzmtitutjnn deans mt

1′

113

‘?9. as regards the griavalacxe pf the
rcspect sf whom the learned acnﬁoxﬁ.

Plaxljunda Raddy made

promoted aﬁcr the

auhzniaaion made is that tigeisaad coiitéiitii-n
met in the objectéfmg in the
babcha Emm the
rulings senier mumci
drew ms decisions, which
(199332 sec 340,
(19§7)3 232,913 1990 so 357,

am sc 1255 and Am 2006 so

In the said contentions put forward,

»’ on the point, thcreforc, wﬂl have to be

1″ ._ V V

Coxmtitutisn Baruch of the Supreme Court in the

. ” cf Mohammad Shujat Ah’ Vs. Union af India,

repartad mm 1974 SC 1531, has heid thus:

“Article 16 is only an instance of incident of
the: guarantee of equality cnahrizlcd in Article

}’

114

H: it gives eﬁect to thc doctrine: of equaiitjr
in the aphcrc of public amploymc-nt.§V._

cznncept of aqual opportunity In _

article 16 pexrwtaes ‘
an individual’s

appnmunent 3
tarmmation to thc cf ‘gxfamity
pcnsum and gives expr§§s1o’:1_.to -id’-aaliof
aquahtyyof one of the
great socio-eooﬁbnﬁc (‘mt in the
Preambiﬁ ¢-I” A

Apart {mam-; B.<:'nch also hald thus:
"Ta " tion based on
'£:;;_'nii.", ati::x::;§1{:@rta:_"'J'.rn1i-3__ "ms nnt obligated by the
_ mum. a£Vthc£'*;i1iti}es afthae higher post, is m
V stiﬂe tI]"I§"313"("._'-_l'__ﬂ.§. thrust of the equality clause."

V , Caurt, , on the facts of the

" . to hold that the mic of promotion which,

that non–g1-aduate Supervisors are aha

" 'Tﬁz._to"'b¢ promoted as Assistant Engineers, maervm a

quota of vaca.z& £01' pmmotian for graduate

' Supervimra as again: x:aon~gradt1at:e Supervisors,

115

would clearly be.-. calculated to cimtroy the

oppomuﬁty.

82. In the case of
D.B.Balli0}7P<I. reported in am 419579 30 T_§:z.<3.f mxiagg

with ArticIe16(1), the Apex held

'18 …. ./me pmgczmn gar uﬁi-féi-§1t;a_ 14 and
16(1) will be Ranch 2:

md’§kmmt and
in prefei

It is
true autimrity had the

i2.t1niﬁ.i”*–. conditions cf service

_ “employee concerned to
httefs eniployment without
hpijée, But, such (Excretion has to be

‘ in accordance with reason and fair

§:;af,;~i__ mt capricimasly. Be:-aft of
gaﬁgsmagty am! faxrness’ , discretion

z into arbitrax-ixwsas which in the

very antithest of the rule of law on which
our democratic polity h founded. Arbitrary
uztvmtdon or enforcement of a servxnc
condition tezrmjnatrmg the aezvicc 91′ a
temporary emphyee may its:-.3! constitute

1115

denial of aqua! protection and offend
equality clause in 3:19.14 and m m. C
16(1) guarantees “equality of

all cmmns irxmathers
er appointment, to :’u_1§n:i_£ér

State”. Moreen.-er, .?;;§”‘the

undnrlying 8.16 of ﬂiev,Gumera1’€3ﬁu§és S

the expressing}, ‘apgeéﬁatmemt’ ﬁned
Art.16(1} will ihcluédc ;_ of er
remcvai from aarvicvg. 3’_u%ief§ ” ”

19. cxprwsion
‘n*;£Ltt:1r1*a_ used in

‘$3 = initial mattzzra
‘eff employment, but
‘xpﬂ in relation to

“aprixar, and subsequent, to

” the eréplaymept which are mmldental to the
. form part of the henna and

_ of such employment, such as,
as to salary, incrcmcnta, mare,

.. ,.__~g1*a ti1ity, pension, age of aupcranazmatimx,
” _p’r:omotion and even termirmtian of

empbymmt. It is further wall mtablished
thatArtn.1-4, 15(1) and 16(1) farm partofthe
5.31123 constitutional code of guarantees and

supplexnent each ottuar. If any authority is
needed for the ah-ave arzuntﬁatinn, neﬁerence

117′

may in made to the observation made. A’
Gajendragadkax J., as he then .
General Manager, Southern wig; T’ T
Ra.rgac1mri[AIR 1962SC:36}i:;1;pr:g}”_:.” ‘:

as. In thn Gas: of
reported in (199917 sec 2o9, fm.= c§xm:1mt§:;n”’23¢§;;h of V’

mg: Ape.-.x Court, cmazmg witii 1*${a;é”héid thus:

“The word there
is m§:m.«§;ga.~ne gm fold, the
.. above the
stag; §:f: reﬁnmmmnt. Article

lﬂi) empisyee otlxez-wise
“;,»:»H81h1e– or who exzrxma Within

t’.ﬁc__zom .9f’ cr;a1xjs1dcra11on, -«E ﬁxndarmntal

‘ ” ﬁght tc..3§¢”oomidcred” for promotion. Equal
for pronxrtitm. If a person
eligibility and acne criteria but

is”: considered for promotion, than t’.I.r1ere

” . be 3 ciear infracﬁon ofhis ﬁnmlamenml
fight to be ‘considered’ for promotion, which

is his personal right.’

” 84-. A Damion Bench of this court, in the calm sf
Charms Gorwda Vs. Hg}: Court 0fK(21″nc:tczica, reported

I18

in 11,1? 2004 Kamamim 44533. has also held

prim’ ts. ng’ ht to in conaidertxi» .f_:)1′ M

Ct-nstitutﬁan of India.

35. In the light of’:’L’t1_g; am by thc
Constitution Bench Ag: a Division
Bench of right tar be:

” a ﬁmdamental
‘izs :’:;t:;::-‘I. for promation. The
ﬁrorldng between 10 to 30
years, the Writ petition avermgznta,

are aimiiarly placed film the

»A mt been promoted only because they
2 qualiﬁcation or Law Degree, and thus

fiﬁa’ the petitioners for bcing considered far

‘A to the next hcigha past, has bun severely

The petitioners cannot be deprived sf their

® right to be cormidered ﬁr pmmnﬁnn by

way of proviso and explanation substituted by way of

2009 amendment Rules to 1973 Rules.

119

Pug ts Na.-4 &6:

86. The next point to be considered ~

criterirm fimad by the proviso

um-eaaonablc, terry, isfatikiraal and’ 1 V’

ofﬁrticles 14- and 3,6 oftI1e'(3s):i’in:titutj:5r!,.V_

37. The expLennatiVor;1:.V:”caA_r¢:s12cct of The
method of category
of it ciear that even
to riagree or a law
{m granted and it is not
sautov’ﬁ:s.+;t§::.*V prescribed to obtain

‘thus it is clear that grant of

% V’ é ‘pegimissim is naiégﬁmmatia and it is else subject 13:» the

Chiefdustioe and, as such, there is no

{if every parson acciung’ perms’ aion, being

giv!§n _A’3~permission automatically because, the vary

‘ . _¢$§;_a1anaﬁon says the permission is net automatic.

88. ‘The second aspect is, the Circular at Annexum ‘M”

dated 24.8.2610, groduced by the petitionem in

W.P.Nc:a. 22155~84/2010, pmvidtn the faﬂnwing

u #

120
guidelines formulated with regard to grant c>f
an pumua further studies by the caﬁicemf
Hg’ in COLl.t”E.: ‘V . ‘4 ‘V

“1. The
Court who are 205′
megzeea/LL.B;LL.M;3£aaier’g

by attending
acquiﬁng
should e;::*” Hozfble

the c:h1egf %Jwic¢. foliowing

i}_ _A K A’ ‘€319; will not adversely

. L %¢;+1’¢c:£’%%j:;:;ge;=xij:w:§r;: am in part1cu]a’ 1- the

13oiir:3V'<3f'ws;i;*;1dy will permit than to

tixttnenormal omcial hours;

that " """ have passed the

igieparumanmx mcamixzations prescribed
4% post heid by them.

,. V At one point oftinne not more than 10%
‘or the amma;amcsa1a vwrldng in a
particuiarcadmshallbepertnzitbed to pursue
Degree’aILL.B}’LL.MlMaster’s Deenmxhma
as atawd at SI.No.1.

9}./~

I21

3. Perrniaaian shall be granted on
basins of seraiority at” the oﬁcers/ofﬁci_af1wi”‘d£’_’v:…:

their mapectiw: cadres and the
beentit1edtcprefe1’eImev” ‘””‘ ‘ ”

39. What is clear from

prescribed in the circular g: 313%
not more than of in a
pa:-m’:ula’ 1′ cadre to pursue
Degree] LLf_3afi315,M/ mg and
of seniority. If
véjéonjunction with the
puts a maximum of 5

ycara as rightéy submzlttad by

,~.:=rJunael Shri S.P.Shar1kar, many of

» V”–‘f11Ve.,V:e:1.~2.p§<:V:'j;=za__<',s will not be able to obtain degree

._ ali, as 10% of the exnployam per cadre

'i§é'o;ii4'5I V.r&:q :.1ire me:-rt than 5 yesm ff) obtain deg-cc or

" as the case ntmjr be.

90. As far as the smﬁwha are in grzrup C?-‘~’ tategory or

emsn 8D&a and F’IJAs are cnmmmed, as airaady

mexztjgneci, many of the employees fwd moved an to the

‘X

$22

next post by way of promotinn in tha

mixzixnum quaiiﬁcatian required far a Gmzgﬁ ‘

mm :31′ appointmcnt is 7′??..Sfa_ 1} ar{i”éiix-:3′;Vné$’t K V’

SSLC. F&, if an emplojﬁe

passed “N1 standard wants pursue a w L’

he would require for
PUC and another and thus mam
than 3 yesaIt’5._WiI1 W the goal in
obtaining V’ Lhx: expiﬁmation
and subject ta 1%
Words, the prascxiption of S

‘ qualiﬁcation sfwuld be

azﬁqtéired’ arbitrary, ur1z’eason.ab1c and

lacks raﬁanal rzmzus.

.. apart, ths pariod sf 5 years starts from the

‘A permission is granted. “I’hat means, 3 person

‘ “min obtain: permission alwuid join the milge on the

: my next day and camplene the ccunse in five years.

Joining the coilcge an the very ncxt day of ebtajning

permission is impoasibln because, admissions are mad:

I”

.l’
..

£23

fmm thc dates notiﬁad and within stipu§ated_.’p¢ﬁ}_:$d:

kme may tale: more aﬁempts to

Fer time masons also, the pr¢ap:fiptio;’1″€3f’–3,£;»;sz::s.V ”

obtain the required degrees 73

without appiication cf Such. v

the explanation under <2 z.=. the
ecxnatitution. .. _ ' _ A H

92. me Apcx cf TN. Vs.
P.Kn’sImq Sec 517, ms
taken note of whiha
ut1i§:;=-5 the validity af suberdinate

Inga’ ‘V t observatiorxa are noted at

1?’, 18 and 19 and they are as

the rule is valid in its enm»e~:y* ?

~~_ 15. There is a. pmumpuon in favour ef
cormtimtionality ctr validity of a subordinate
laglblatian and ﬁn burdezz is upon him who
attachittnslmwtkxat itis Itisaiso
well recognised that :9. subordinate begklation

124

can be chalkmgcd under: any cf tha fo11owijrg: “f._ 4
grounds: V
(61) Lack of legislative mmpemmg
thesubordinate 1zg.as1a:sm.ur ‘ A: é
fb} Violation of 7
guaranteed 11zn31ax’tI:-;ee.(:’,ormtV:if;;’tia’:n 3
gay violmm cf gr
Constitution of.India,.–~– _ .. .. ‘2

{d} Faihzre ‘t«:.~…é;:1_:1A:fr;«:o_rr11 smmm under

which it is ma»§g’T’og of
auuuprity .the’¢x:,ab1′;§ng Act.

re) ﬂ3*”A3l’ v1aV’§t?ts.”VVof the ma,

.’

Z ” ” « .V ‘ ‘ » uizxreasarzable-
x:;a§saV(ﬁ’c:V . the court 1mg’ ht well

newt intcndcd ts

. .. such mks).

. considering the validity of a

— Legislation, will have to oomider

Vtiig-ijj_ object and scheme: of that
Act, and aka the area over which

” agfsowczr has been dclagatead Imdcr the Act and

then decide whether the subordinate
l@¥Iation canfcxm to tm parent stamina.
Whereamieia dhactljrmwrmiswntwitha
mnndamry pcmvisinn of the statute, thazz, of
course, the tank aftkm court is simple and

2″‘
.»

123

easy. But wlmrc the eantcntion is that
irmonsistcney or nan-confcrnﬁty of V~ :
in not with reference to any specific M

of the enabling Act, but x:aviﬁ1-the ‘;:’;;-ii «
scheme of the parent Act,
proceed with cauiﬁgn ‘beg.-.’n». ”

invalidity.


17'. In  
{Bmnbay} [P]     Cuurt

n-arm-e;:= tp gm¢¢% ” which a
as
fofibwgii V V

H ” Iognﬁasiatinn does
rice; _. degree :21′ immumty

isx’ a statute passed by a

V’ Icgiﬁaturc. Subordinate
he quastianed an any of the
on which plenary legislation is

Z M addx£ian’ 1′: may atst: be

on the ground that it daes not
¢:or;fimntot}zestazuhsunden”whid1itismade.

“‘It may further be queatzloned on the grouncl

that it is ccnttrary ts some other statute.
That rs baoause subordmm Iagnslaﬂon must
yze£d to plenary Iagtslatzon. It may also be
queatéaned on the ground that it is
unreasonable, unzxeaaonnble not in the sense

126

of ant being reasonable, but in the

that it is manifestly arbiu-axy.”

(emphasis

18. In Supreme C-eurt
Aasn.v.Union of ‘.

the validity of n

npen to quesfmn if
Constitution V or
repugnant to of the
laws of the :§.:*rV-_” or
authority
furthnr hcid

.. to be declared
marzifestbr unjust or

% ..§;jr’k§;.1ﬁ’ageaus or ch:-ec’ ted to be
uni¢ut1′;ozfia;_e:i~gnd¥*’]or vinlative ar the: general

‘ ‘V qf lngfw of the hand or so vague that

_ . be predicbed with certainty as ‘In
T. :1 ‘4s;fh5it~.[.it’_;prol1ibited or 39 urxreasonatzhe that

be: attributed tea the power
ﬁieiegated our oﬂmwiae disclose bad faith.

A19. In Shri Sifaram Sugar C01/ad vﬂninn

of India a Constitution Bench of this Court
reiterated :SCC pp.:251-52,para 47)

“4?.Pow-21′ dclaagatod by statute is Iimzited by
its terms and subordinate to its ohjccts. The

I27

dclcgatae must act in good faith, reasonably
intra virm the pawn” granted,
relevant oonsidaration «of material 5.11;
his daciaiorm, whether ;M’% aQ V
legnklative or at-Aq@5ia#i1j§1d3tiﬁI; A’
must be in harmony «.

and mixer laws crf

‘reasonably
enabling 1egis};g{inn’..’_VA “Mounﬁxg V.
Family mbzmtimg an:

manife§ti3.t__ xgnjslaa or
ts:

degree to the

” «jg;-5 ti~.?.é_”bbj:i§-zcts of delegation,
gay, 4f3az’ha.rnent° never

ir1ii5ndé:i~. t<':c "g,'n}a. , éiztt1crrity to make such
and ultra

p'.-_a-%%%:md Russel of Killowen, C.J in

% * 9:*s'.

(A; ,ua A%(f) gnaw that, in the mum case, the grounds at

T 94.

Vs. KTK Khmnalcarcm, reports-d in 1989 Supp. (2) SCC

_ iii”-u§e;Vv.JoI31maon’.

clear from the grounds mentioned at

A x ‘(-b), (#3:) and (1) are squarely am-acted for the rcaaom
The Apex Court,i11 the cane efN.AbduI Basheer

128

344, has hsaki that where no consistent po1ic§r:’f”-Ufa;

followed in treating the graduatzas and —

two separate claaacs, in the abgacnge of ” ”

in respect of conditions and izmaaenm .51′ f :” s¢%.$»-aénf

graduates and mn-gz’adL’*h_tc§, ”

arr} norrgraduahs ratio in is

violative of Articles ‘mfcorxstitution of

95. are both mm.

g1*a;mat$~ _ é;s:b’1*1a§r¢:]} working 11:1 various
Vim’ :iia:J1x:ho’ ‘ 11 was made in the

past Vvtlriig-2y.’4’»*V:-fci’§:_”_.;,’>:”om::t;e<3. to the higher cadre.

Lapart; qualiﬁvzwatinn and law degree is
a mapcat of feeder posts and enly Gmup 'D'

,AV.:'v.':'SDAs, Fans, wan: Assistants,
< A Judmt Writers anci Senior Judgment
AA are now required to possess Degreeflaw Dqree
and, in this regard, refemncc can be made
tn the Apex Caurt dminhn in the case of State ofMyso:-e

Vs. Knsimaﬂrfurtfg, reported inAIR 1973 SC 1146.

3../«
.42″

~ I

139

96. The Apex Court, in the afoz-maid case

that division into twa classes of ” V-

wrvioe belonging to same oadrg .f¢;_pu:p6se’* ‘

‘ in promntional oppcvixftuzajitg-‘1

14 and 15 of the Canat’i¥;ut§on Va:

ﬁxrthaer held that Pﬂwezr to.
can mt be gmoonstitutional
diam-iminatia;2_ in (}o1.ren-mxaxant
man”

pexbsorm-‘ mentioned above were

appo’uit4=;i”‘L:na§t:r recnsitmcnt Rulm. 1973 and

by insisting upon possession of

A qualiﬁes’ titans, which is impossible

“ta bcs. eic;’2′:1¢1:ed”‘ by them within the pericsd prescribed in

.% exp} nation to mm’ and in the Light of z*eat:z’ic!3′:3r1
” by fire: circular at Annexure. ‘M’. ‘I’hemfore,

F mtw1tha’ tanding the sub:::ums’ inn made by Ieamaed senior

counsel Shri Basava Pmbhu Patil that, 801115 of the

empbgyees are pursuing degree} law degree courses, that

, I

110

imalfwill not give mom to take. the vim? that the’

and mcplanatian to the amerxded Rules are .

vwea of they being asrmtrgzy, H K V’

disc.nrmna’ ‘ wry, irrational and thus if

98. Further, it has to

having a basic degmg. oné”c.§;ij:£§'”t.._9btaiii”‘1aiE degm
which will have the 5; The Apex
Scmjay (200911 sec 610,
T ma} ‘ through distance
edﬁagtaqn §§§’r{§m:g»§:sity system of Annamelai

fa as equivaicnt ta Masts:-‘s

course. The same is the

M 1 Apex Court in Annwnazai University
._ A us. Secretary ta G-am’; Informaéion

Depwﬂnent & others, repoma in (200914

.. VT$cc”s§o.

99. If the aﬁaresaid pasitinrz in Jaw in appiied ta the

case on hand, Senior Judmnt Writars carmot obtain

I..awD%atte1xii:Lgrag’I11arcoumeandtheywi1Ih.ave

131

to £3111 back only on open univeraitias or correspo:idé;i3<;E':,,'4

course and the dag:-ae of Law obtained by '

mat the requirement cf '

ansended Rules in mm" of the Age;

prongunccnmnt in Guru Uniijemityﬁ. Eat

the aforesaid reason; the are in

the amnnaatisze.

man: No. 551.;

ICE}. 0f the eﬁect of the
aznmdca ﬁubmiaésion of Icarned scnior
Patil that the amensied

mks: ~L*:ﬁ’:c$i’.*t from the date they have been

sutatimtirng them in the parent

‘ On the contraxy, the oonttmti-on of the

H is am the axzaanded rules cannot

the exiauxag bemﬁt that has accrued to the

” ‘ The position in haw reveals the following.

101. The Apex Ceurt, in the came of Kﬂﬁangcﬁah Vs.

J.Sree’m’1:asa Rem. reporwd in (198313 SCC 284, has

held that, where the amendment dispenses with tie

13.7..

original prowriaicn far oomidacring 1.13.03.

U.Z).Cs. for promotion and ‘

promotional chaencw cfthe.c1igi}:sl-3 :,.%m.:a’; K ‘
aﬁacted and they were supez’céc1ed;’_’_’¥:w}é;V

respect of the t1i¢*- .;)r5sta%
oc:cur1-ing prior tn will
have to be ﬁlled 1:55 unamended

102. In; .s§:gh Rathare Vs.
1 scat: 505, the Apex
cccurring print to the
prommﬁagﬁan V<:$'f. Rules of 1998 will have to be
the old Rules of 1988.

3′ case in the case {sf mate of

L R.Dayal, repomcx z’n(1997)10 sec: 419, it

helci that the @119 which fell vacant prior to

V’ .amenc1znsen1: cf the Rube would be governed by the

original Rubs and not the axrmnded Rulaa.

104. In the mam on hand, it is not in controvtarsy

between the parties that most oftha pmmcﬁam effmted

‘.1

133

were in respect of the vacancica that arose
t. Even a perusal of the records ~
the lcarned senior munml for R-.3. IE?’ K ‘

most of $115 vncancm-.5″ at-we prm’v:r ax’ :j

of 2009 beixrg brought izzwfghrgge. g

ms. In view of the xasg aéwxg Apex
Court, rm of being
somidered fc_-9 p1’O’Vi$¢ now
Enut, on the
oomr’a’rjy–, “me ‘ would have
by; under the original Rules,

have that pcrscm who are promotacl

mnended Rules of 2009. In ather
A ‘ V:V”*word;§;.A cﬁbct has bear: given to the
‘~ ‘ and that too in respect of the vaca:ncnsa’

eiféﬁse prior tn the mating into farce of the

V. ” Rules of20G9.

105. Atthfmjunctureitnzayalaoheuaefialtoz-eferto
the commcntary of the ieanxad author N.S.Bindra on

Lzlrm Interpretatic:x1 cf Statutes (311 Editzinn) and, at page

r’\

134

?’?’6, the lcaxned author has obaenreclw
rem-oapectixae operation is not to be ﬁver: to V’
as to impair an cxiat.i.ng r7gh§.;er ‘
than as Peﬁﬂrds mattaer of
wlggg’ h takes away: or gpax.’ T’
min ‘ laws 0 AV or

af:’;ae§f1’g_=;3. uc_iisabi1ig must

be be rennaggtrve

esanawdu

ix:1p1ica’t:x.23;[ﬁ:. the learned author
at aéfects subatambm right is
Vto’ unless maﬁa retrcnsp-eactive

eiﬁ1z=3z’_ earpfmsly’ sir necessary intenclment.

‘ amended Rulcs have: {alien away not

of the petitioners xmzier the existing

1€u1§esjg$fi’973, but also deprive th.-;-zm of me beneﬁts of

V’ ” up, time” bound incremexzts and senior scale of

as ad} of them would have bee;-xxx eligibie for

pronmtian but for the amendment and the axnemiment

by way of proviso and cxpianation is, thcrcforc,
arbitrary, ciiscrimixmmry} irratignal and wleiative nf ttw

135

righm guaranteed umiezr Articies 14 and

Ccrmﬁtutzican and hence unmnstitutianal.

1303;” t No.7:

:08. Coming to the jugTs::ﬁcati¢m[“~:;r gramign A

ordem, even an fhcts, it ix
beicmghilg to Gmup. d’iAs:iVii,e:t $3oa3wa
the degree and some
of the petitioners are
also % Tu? by mm the
;&’pmisa1 ef the records also
aﬁcriai, the reqtziﬁnmnt of
degzmwgé’ Quad as one tima measure.

vIf§{.;§.:;z;:}1 be tn one employee as a

» I fail to understand as to why such a

H 2 not extended to the petitioners, who, for

fééaaom -» mermmical or otherwise, oculd not be

‘A enough no haw either df or law dqree

‘ “Mien they entered scrvicc several dccadaa ago.

209. Apart from that, as most of “thee pmmotiorss are

givezxagainstthexmcanxzieswhichamsepriartotlue

an/;__

136

coming into force: of the. amended Ruleua, the

who are entities! athexwise to the said ~

have men dcprived of their to’ _for=_ ‘

promotions. Far a1} that-.

to the persons, wimse ord’e;§_1fs.._gf pi-ozﬁﬁtion in
of service 1.;pheId in Law as
the said. prromotio11I 9_-r!=2:._i:1 fundazzcmntal
rights at considered far
the prcraﬁao and the
eupsgnagtiéizkg of 2009 being held
to unraassnnable, irraﬁcnai

“of guarantee conferred

Arﬁclea 1+ and 15 of ms.-.

11o.. _§1 the light crf the tirgunrzents advamed by the
senior coumcl Shri S.P.Shankaa.r, it becomes

natszaasary axﬂ inevitable to wganaizm the procedure

followed in brmging out: the amended Rules of 2009 into
force. The draﬁ Rules at Anne.-.::ure–C, which have been

3,»

$4’
V n

137

publiahaad in thc. gazctv: dated 12.5.2009

the very first paragraph thus:

“In mrercﬁse cf the

mm: 229(1) and (2) m~ m¢;e,.m:m;¢n;%fa ”

and all atller
in supersession of all 113$’

the subject, V

.am:;a_1or so far
as ” aliowarnzea,

the method of

cf aerviea, the

Emma and pensions

A __H1’gh Court of Kamamka mm
1 to as ‘t1m3ervice”.”

£11, re, appears ﬁbm the afoz-esa:d’ preamble
AA the gsractts mtiﬁcextion that the approval cf the

r af Karnatnka has been obtmm-rd” . But, the

Iearmxl seniaar mumal for Re}. and B-2 dist ccmoeda very

that, in the objectizsns fled R-1 and RE, it has

“r

I38

been stated that that draﬁ mics did not see the

the day as they were not approved by the _

Karmxtakn, At the same time, the gazt: ” 9

mt-.ntz’:ms that the appmvalﬂii of

Karnazalm has been obtaigmg.

112. If the draﬁ g;; §:i::g piibiiﬁlixgcltiin thc
gazette, are to be coma ﬁrm:
force in view cf the Ciausa Act,
the aecz_a:«§ of 1973 Ruse…

If qumticon cf bringing
Shri S.P.Sha1:1}car is fully
that the procadure followed bath

‘ reg;-:=r:t”«é$f Ruben an anal} as that: amended Rubs

– ;;£ in mmonarxze with the well established

:51′ “law and the preoepta and practice that are ta

” in respect of amending anﬁct.

113. In the light of the aﬁormaid discussion and

anawcra to the points rated for 0-onsicleration, all the

writ petitions are allowed on the foilawing terms:

139

The proviso as well as cxplanation to the amended

Rules of 2309 mquiring higher
quashed. as being violative of Articles 16 ~
theCana1:itutior1and u
The orders of prornotix>1r1;s:.Aan;’_”y;r

W.P.Nou. _ 4ssa.4?é2%;_V;ao1b,. in

W.P.Nos. 11797-zxazfifzoiq, H. J
as K in w.P.Hm}}”22:5.¥;s2’2’1.5:4[291o, Annexureg-
c, :3. 11%-5» F inkMvi.P.Ncg_.fkssceﬁtsiswszz2009 and

Arme@ % 1337249/2009 given

” whoac promotiom
writ petitions stand
thc quashinﬁ of the orders of

1 it is aka netsessary in the inter-east of

of the High Court that no hardship is

” _ &;aused from the point of mew’ of emurmg’ the

smooth adnainiatratiozi of the work of the High
Court and hence, the pemcns, whose; promotions
are now quashed shall. howevsr, be pernlittcd to

continue in their rmpectivu posts as an incharge
~”\

140

arrangmncnt, til! the pmmotiom arc ma;i”e in
accordanrzae with the 1973 Rules, aftm K
the cases of the pdtitioncrs am for

iv) As regards the relief “E33: u
W.P.Noa. 22155-22134;
restriction fbr Writgﬁ; pk»: ” A
ofAssiata1:1t of the
mine
relixzf saught
is not it is left
V) The aeqané Qiisrected tn redo the
to all the: posts in
of 1973, and necessary

‘*a.tcpa vs’;-dg shaﬂ be takcn mm’ cight

dab: of receipt of a cspy of this

Sd/’I
JUDGE

Qihxavrz csg:c1«=/-

141
OR_D_ER OH BEING SQKER TD
VQ :

13.1.2011

pctitisonars in W.P’.N<:zs. 22255-2;_a1a+[ Q1010 T

the memo ﬁled for .

learned acmk;-r counacl for
R1 mjdﬁai ._ <

2. CIaz’i:5x:atinns in respect of

i) sen” m’ r Judgmant Writers to
h§6ki_V%Aonl§Vf .f._’34 ;.*g:”s\t§’..’L’of Assistant Rcgistrars d’ hers

‘me rafib’=§?.:V1__;_;,.

A 4′)’ provkiad to direct recrntitmcnt.

” ccxmpetitive test at all atages of

only to stenographic cadre imtead cf

promotirma on seniority and service records.

3. During the course cf the subminsimrn made,

learned senior oounaei Shri S.P.Shank:ar submitted that

in rmpect of promotion to the post 131′ Assistant
n

J-/’

. I

242

Regstrars, the ratio of 2: 1:1, which was

1973 Rules has to be niaiiitaixied Zaiidj. esfeii’

amended Rules. same ratio is rnaiiittdﬁed. TVherefoIi:. ‘i:
see no need for any clariiicationiin 1’eg%1ifd”‘to3 reivijo is

concerned.

4. As regards Vconchict — Veoi’z11ieiLiti3}e’.v tests at all
stages of p;’od1ot§oi1-,’_ir1 feepect of ietelioigféiphers cadre is
concezfnedii iI~ deviétjori .f:¥¢:in 1973 Rules in the
prese11’tF2O-()9 .-As such. no clarification is

required exien i11.t_his

” 5′ . fa.i”~.a_s 40’3riv’:’m2iat.io provided for direct 1’CCT’i1it1I1CI1t

1 judgment writers and senior judgment

wa:ij;vers_.-ind’ amended Rules of ‘£009 is conoemed.

since” the direct recruits are not made parties and

f:.,;1fdf;er, as this court has directed the second

l§’€SI30I1€i€I1t ii» ﬂfineezad to redo the entire pmcess of

promotions to all the posts in accordance with old Rules

of 1973. in my view, no further clariﬁcation is necessaajv

Q; 1’esp€:Ct of the same. ﬁf
K. I

I33

5. In View of 1:331: aforcsaici ¢ba¢rvatirms,

taken eariiar, therefore, does run .

modifmation, _ =
Asa –

ckcf –

Sri C Sudhakar vs The Hon”Ble The Chief Justice on 14 December, 2010

Like this:

Related

Leave a Comment Cancel

Sri C Sudhakar vs The Hon”Ble The Chief Justice on 14 December, 2010

Share this:

Like this:

Related

Leave a Comment Cancel