" % A-G_ED»_A--ABwGfUT 40""x'E3ARS.
J%c:;%1$i; :1{L:f1\%iAR,
MAHADEVAPPA,
'- A(}E$D ABOUT 40 YEARS.
% * €'>_, SR1. 3. MAHESH,
IN THE HIGH comm OF KARNATAKA, BAN%§§AL{:§;:*:i;%~
DATED THIS THE 20% DAY cm? Ak
BEFORE %L%%V _ %% .
THE HQNBLE MR. JUSTICQERAM 1.\)EC}.I~L'&I:\I'v_RVI§.':I3I§'Y'V:
WRIT PETITION vI\§£§.79$5"$VI_i' 2609 {@2351
BETWEEN: 4' % ' E V %'
1. SR}. QT. '
s/0. s.*m1MMmAH,'%. %
AGED AI3;GU'»F 5'{}'5YEARfS'§"'-- '
2. SR}. iéasria,
s/0.13. ABDL?I;.«v.I_{E:TADEi?__ BASHA,
AGED".ABi_Z){}'I' k57*;Y_EARs%.%
3. SR}, 3. L}IA_rm3U1§I;exT:--i,
S /9. ERAPPA,
% %S)'G*- NINGWPA,
AGED A_B QUT 40 mms.
SR1. 'ra¢,A'iMALLIKARJUNA,
C11'
% 3/<3. JAYANNA,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS.
7'. SR1. RH. SURESH,
i
(I.
10.
11.
12.
_ U154.
16.
S/C). ERANNA,
AGED mom' 38 YEARS.
SR1. PRAKASB,
s/0. DODDA OBAIAH, _
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS. *
SMT. SAKAMMA, s
w/0. MANJUNATH, '
AGES ABOUT 25
SMT. SHARA{)AM:IvIA,* If
sM'1\..T1\4:'£)_."\2'3E1\:A; "
W/O. OBANNA, %
AGED A130???-
SR1. ]3ErIASKAR,'*._ \ .
s:;'--Q. SCiMAS§~€iEIUT so YEARS.
SR1; *A.B4DUL JABBAR,
? S/0-. ABDUL RASHEED sag,
LL A "AGED wow 55 YEARS.
SMT. LAKSHAMMA,
W/O. H. MURIGENDRAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS.
SMT. SYED BANU,
W/O. ABDUL STTAR SAB,
x2'
I
W/O. NEELM«;ANTA?PA, k. V t
AGED $5} [ .
convening a meeting to consider the said motiortsf or V,
confidence', prompted the petitioners to V' "
respondent by I'£*§I'6S€1'}.i",ati()}T1 date'd. 'I to
convene the meeting.
2. The provisions of V-47(3) of
Municipalities Act, ef 30
days from the date of to convene
a meeting to olotien’ by the
C«OII1II1i.SSiOI]fit.”<t.;',":::43';i'7 not convene the
under sub~–seetion
(2) of Seeijoi} of the petitioners is that
the re:spoz1tfii'er1t, uby notice dated 18-O3»-2{}09
cotiifefied the meeting on 9-4-2009 at
"';ie.1§x(}£»39u would be beyond the 30 days' fime
fxxed-..4__V eub~sectio11 (3) of Section 47, for
" 'j.__eoz_1si(ie"I*intTg the 'no conficience motion', virtually
'V/'
A the effeft of the petitioners to have their 'no
Ii" ' Veofifidence motion' considered by the Munieipa}
WK
Council. in other words, the motion of 'no '
dated 2e–o2~2oo9 Annexure~"A", f:»:o:3l.d spéiiekieréateee
if the meeting is held on 9–~'¢ii–20O<§;.Voiie'_i1i?V1e
it is beyond the time se'Lpu1ai;iez:'{:'i1.1idei*'of
Section 47 of the Act. v}rIence,'..'ehieL:wfiie.petifioii;
3. Having e.heard’….!:§.1_<§:V for the
petitioners 44 is considerable
force in is held on 9*
4~20{.)9 vveenfidenee motion' dated 26-
02-2009, defeated as the meeting is
to beyor1d:iihei:3O day period fixed under sub–
Seetiozl 47 of the Act. On tiiis gonad
deserves to be allowed.
In vibe result, this writ petition is allowed. The
dated 18433-2009 Axmexure-“E” 9:” the
jfeejgiondezit is quashed with a direction to the
_4 ifrespondent to issue notice convening the meeting \:§2’it11§I1
M
30 ciays from 264)?-2()O9 to consider the ‘no %
motion’, that is on or before 27~o3-2009; f£>t*t1″:wi’–3;i1.-;’ V ‘