High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri D N Vishwanatha vs The Divisional Controller K S R T C on 9 February, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Sri D N Vishwanatha vs The Divisional Controller K S R T C on 9 February, 2010
Author: Manjula Chellur Gowda
 

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 9" DAY OF FEBRuARv,#A#;'tj'i'Q-'EEj'=1'-T VA

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MRs.3usTIcE-:MAN,1uLA c}{EL's,uR*--1'«' 

THE HON'BI.E MR. JUSTICE A.N";1'JEf'éALjAC5OPA§;2§"GOV\ri§A.EVT"-,

WRIT APPEAL NO.VE3Qii)*.2>0O9.V. a'LfKSF:{TCx)':.V»4'V'VV T

BETWEEN:

 

Sri. D.N.Vishwanatha, " '

S/0 B.K. Narayana,  

Aged about 45 \_,{'e*a'_rS,  E'  _  
Residing at    "   
Mudigeri TQvm~,4'  "   »
Mudigeri Ta-fuk; » _  é_
Chickmag_aiur.,D'ist:;€§c.t.  

I      :APPELLANT
(BY Sri.'M,C.P',r.ati;~2?.-r;1'v..)v  ~ s --

AND :

V 1. Thgi-'fV3ivisioraéi"£?(V)

rjtrofier,

K R2,  Ce ,

T' 'C_hfckm.ag.aAi'urDivision,

T v"Ch'ickvm_z3g»a'iuE.r,'j..

,  ,jChjck_ma'g.alu~f'District.

 _ 2. THE Ge:rz.e'ré:f Manager (Traffic)

T  aangarore ~ 560 027.

 KSRT€;.,'1-Centrai Office,
 Dcjubfe Road.

:RESPONDENTS

sheet and was subjected to a disciplinary enquiryietrh the

allegation that, on 20.10.1998, while he

the bus on the route Holenarasipura to Chariniarajyeavpatna;

the bus was checked by th:e””‘c’hecl<'i&ng,':Aofficia'ls*

Channarayapatna and they found 'i:'hat,-_appeli'a'nAt' had

to issue tickets to 8 passenVge__rs,~._,whoV' v~iere…tjija\x/eling from if

_Gannyl<ada to Channarayapatna.",_:an'd,._alsofiA'h'ad"failed to

collect the fare of Rs.3u/é? The enquiry
officer submitted' the charges
leveled against Va'r*'e:1p;ro,V_x\'e'd. The Disciplinary
Authority_.by""co'ns1i1t"i.§~Firig; of enquiry, passed an
order dated' the appellant from
service. " preferred, which was un-

successfuel. Txhe._.V:o’rde,rs were challenged by raising a

Vdispute _:un.der”..Section 10(4–A) of the Industrial Disputes

}’i::_t,’-‘;€§4’7,””_~(f,or.,short ‘the Act’) in the Labour Court. The

N’ , Labour Cv:ourt”ihteralia held that, the domestic enquiry held

,a’gai,n__st the workmen was fair and proper and thereafter

e.op.poi’tunity having been given to both the parties to lead

it :’_”‘evi–dence on merits, considering the record, found no merit

/”

/,