1' R'O'I_I,O\IyING:
Of t}I.ev..-Short point involved after learned Government
A' {fxdvbcate was directed to take notice for the
% E .. Tesponderxts. 9/
Ix.)
(HIGHER EDUCATION}, M S BUILDING,
BAN{}ALORE~560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR
COLLEGLATE EDUCATION,
SHESHADRI ROAD, BANGALORE".
.
(By STIJAGADISH MUNDARG_IL*f§:.A.} V _ ,
THESE wps FILED PRAYING TO QUAS?H THE
PORTION OF THE. IM}{?UG.NF.D~.._ ORDER JDATED
15.10.2009 AS PER .I\.NN.EXURE~B--« S'1T'RULAT1NG IN THE
ORDER PORTION }REE3FECT OF' OTHER
TEACHING COM1vIUNITY.'_ f THE--.f_~ _ AGE OF
SUPERANNUATIQN SE~IAI;Lv.CO1'JTINUE BE 60 YEARS
ONLY", IN Si3,_."FA'R :AS" PETITIONERS ARE
CONCERNED, II_OI..DvING SAME ILLEGAL, BAD IN
LAW, ARBITRARY '"TONE;--DIS.c:RIMINATORY AND THUS
VTOLATTVEOE ART'IC_LE_"1<L OR THE CONSTITUTION OF
INDIA" A'ND}f.ALSjO' ACgAINST"'"TO THE LETTER OF
GOvERNMENT,~~»OI«*I V IND;£A- DATED 31.12.2008 VIDE
ANNEXURE-A.. "
;' ''THESE'* .__"'P'ETI'TIONS COMING ON FOR
RRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COIIRT MADE
ORDER
All petitions are disposed Of finally in View
2. Submission of the petitioners counsei».
C.R.Gopa1aswamy is that, the age of retireirient_’fiyas-____’ _
raised from 60 to 62 years in respect of’the:’teaching.e_ ‘*
Community of the University drawing.
in respect of the other teaehirig co’mm1ini’ty,’ the…sa’n’1e
benefit has not been extended’»des.pite..direetion given
by the Govemmerit:i’g.of’.g. letter dated
31.12.2008 [A_nnexurie’¥B);1
3. ._.i;ea:fn_-;_d~ie:o1i1a_se1.._4-also stibmitted that this
court__in given direction to
consider; the petitioner therein.
4. In t}’ie”4iigi1tA”ef ‘ the above submission made
and ieiamed.’ ‘Goyernment Advocate also submitting
~ that in fact a communication from the
‘f}o\-*ernmIente:=V’ of India to consider the age of
superanniiation being raised to 62 years and this
ieourt having given direction aecordingiy in severai
Viwrit petitions earlier, the representations of the
petitioners therefore need to be considered by the
£6
r