IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT
DATED THIS THE 23». DAY OF MARCH j %
I-_!I-I2b'()RE
up-op.'--' 1- u-\_ at 1'rI1"I.fl\'l
BETWEEN :
1. 8ri.l'.'.-.'£rinivas, ~ ' _ 1, ;
S/u.Late 8ri.Devarao. " . 2
Aged about 52 -- " 1 1
12,Ie¢. L
Jounm]ist"C_dl931Y§' .
Bar1gum*-"sir: 5:60 A
3- 3fiéD-Afififiéflfifip . '
g;g;1_a;a_z %
Aecd'ab6ut39
Riat. Tia, 13. 3"_'-
Jiiurnalist'-Colony,'
ffianlgalqre --
A(B«y"31iQ:i{.--P.Aaok11mar,Adv.)
'. S1*i.M:.h.£u:':1'.-e::Lsatapp-.;,
w W H * r Sindc deccascd by his L.Ra.
Sint.M.Khantn.
V' Major, Widowof
Late }v{.Mu1".i'u'e:1'.r.ta1'.-,3.-%.,
x (b) Srl.M.Umesh, Major,
3,! g.L.g;tc M.Mmm
. uu'.'a'uL;E jgI."GU?yK¥AL.. f
"B R
H.R.R.P. No.34/2oos%
i:,i1e petifioner a pen rot' twin years nufii F--
[c) Sri.M.Vcnkatcsh,
iviajor, son of
Late M.M
All e.*.'th.w. rcskiir-.g at ..e.4-8,
C.JA/cnkateshdas Road, .
ififii Cross, iiih iviain,
Padmanabhanagar,
Bangalore -- 560 070.
(By Sri.K.8hivaji Rao ai'
§fi.R1'3hasir:e1j, Axivsii j ' 1 i" " -- . ._
.his 46%;) 91'
'run! --l\VGC I It
Karnataka Rcntfict thevi;n;he1'jdahad 06.03.2008
passed in mccL;ficI1..iiEo.'233j3G1'Ji's airtime iii: of the xiii
Additionai Small" Bangalore, SCCI-I-13,
orde1i11_g_Vto"V.i§1s:i¢:, ,, vdeiim-:1'y-- wa_1_'_ran;t against the J udgment
flcbtars ivhcirxin "i'3i.".1 "re;s;..=e;<:t""".-if Excauflen whwulc
Tilis: on for admission, this day,
the nmiic the follbwing:
ORDER
proceedings were terminated in
mg537/2006 in this Court. Pursuant to order
~ 6.3.39. 29*” 1’~!ovc..m.br:r 2006, t_h_is Coup: gm:_._d $11.43 1:1.)
..__._!__I 1.’… vi
mHDeccmber 2006. One of the conditions was that 11′ the
petitioner commits default in payment of agreed rent for 19
,fl./.
an 1-unsung III-Jung -run;-U-5′-I-Inn I’Ml III 1 -$333:-Q14. C-A O’!
r:
I
«:-
LI
respondent to execute the eviction order. in
the respondent, the petitioner dethulted
rents for three consecutive months; t T
__,_…_____
proceedings were its
3. me ceae~tsa<.:–.vm;;r–u-A -.~..-.
the fact that the * [1 one of
the conditions in the c_!.elivery wan-ant.
The said qusataceeamiustpeumm.
for that the rents were sent by
poet " on the gran .c_l I'.-n.
s He aiso submits "t 11*'
* money order and it has been refused.
that there is no violation of the
imposed by this Court.
3. Mr. Kfshivaji Rae, learned counsel appearing
for the respondents submits and makes grievance that
H-van’ Inuf 10 tumor:
uuua unut. .l.v
go; 3 &
IUUD LIVW UIIIJI , IIIJCZILJ I’VE-D LX313? I-I19 I
1:41-
further submits that he has wanttmly
conditions imposed by this Court. Hence,
can be shown. He submits no
.I-.__…….d.I_. L]… ..__I_.. …._……….._
hp uuy, l.l.1 luy ;. ff)
issue delivery wannnt4′”is_n_’th&t have not
paid the rents Indeed it
is to be order coupon would
–.– -‘-
“z;a_z2i:’;yws:;”se.nt;”””B3If H Ia not
o —r-no is at iiiiit neeu” ‘ not be gone
into ‘at this stage, inasmuch as the
sum of Rs.l,200/- as rent for
ooverlng up to 300’ Nownnber 2008.
K.shivaji Rao, counsel appearing
K ‘V ‘ for is apprehensive that the cheque
— ;n.s.y”no.. he hmomed. by the .-.-=m…m.
6. Havitlgmgmdtothcthctflmtrentssxepaidup
4′” 3u.11.2u
IA}
H I’ own nl” fl-in Irinnr ‘I-I-nut H-1n knsvuuanna-I nwlnmo ..
vu, 1 nu: in 1.119 vnuw unit. um nuyualulvu wumfi
4.1″‘
‘V I
.. -J’
.5.
_ __ .1 I..- n\………. .4′.
pasacu say we msuuating %u.u.$ kble ‘wk
aet=aa1:’.e
and accordingly, it is set-aside.
Petition stands allowed.
7. All pending appucauona
consideration. Hence, the L.
R.
C
Q
*9
CD