Sri D T Rudrappa vs D R Chandrashekar on 1 July, 2009

0
48
Karnataka High Court
Sri D T Rudrappa vs D R Chandrashekar on 1 July, 2009
Author: H.G.Ramesh
 
 

      
M. .A.N€}.1.I2'Q?gf2098

IN THE HIGH COURT 3? KARNATAKA AT 

DATE!) Tms THE 15* my 05* JULY  I   A' 

BEFGRE

THE Hormm mR.Jv3T1cr;"fiV.§§;RAM.Vw " 'Efii-31:: = _  " V'

Misceilaneags First Agm Hal Ng;1.§)54$,g"_ 


BETWEEN;  .    

SR: :>,*m?:U13;eaPPA    -- 
ago LA'E'E TH1f'PEZ':'%UI.3.i2Ai;AI& _. _
AGE: Agaam" 51 ?2'EA:5ia:3_V , ' '
R/'A'1'NO.'}"4, em r";:«RGs.a:~_V  __ _ 
15TH MAIN I-€OPs.'L),*i?}'1'f1_ ;33;.(::+;:s_»; ._ " 
§<;or2A;~AA:sIt;§ALA<     
BANGALCJRE --' 56<3_v03rs_ _  . ..APPELLAI\f'l'
* * "  ' ' ' - {commune}

(BY SR1 K:'iw;!.C:HANDVV1?£§.':_P§~§AS§{D.,:'ADVOCATE.)

ARI): ;' ~ _

  ' i;s;R.{:i--i§.N'i3RA'5:HExAié" """ 
 s,'Q'~33,'1'.RuDR.aPI9A

'A.§;E:; VABQBT fa ";?."E5,RS

R/AT .nf;Q.74,'_:v..F1;,Q'QR, 4m CROSS
15*mMA:N R.<)A.:;»,T 4TH t;3Lo<:x
E§(3RAP+€Ai\¥._€}AL$§

'VBANGAL-QRE - 568 034 ...RESFOHBEH'I'

 '  §E3Y SF»; D.i&.sR:RAMAPPA, AEZIVG-GATES}

(CQEMMONE

"r. ":s:i,F'.;s,. No. 1354512230? ES §3'lLE;£} we 43 RULE Mr} 0;?

 "c ACEAENQ? THE GRDER BATED 1905,2o€:7 PASSED ON

, ':;A;--: :1»: 0.s.N,2@42,I2005, GN THE FELE 0;?' 2 Az3:>;*r1r»:A:,

 '*.r:;:mr -:::viL ARE} SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGAL(;1rE€E2, A:,;,<;aw:Nr;3

" ~ «ma N53,: FILED U/O= 39 RULES : 85 2 .1120?'/2008 IS FILED UIO 43 RULE 1'{'1*}. Q73_£3"'--_
CFC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.10.2008 PASS§_£€;EI..  
E.A.NO.2 IN O.S.NO.2€>42/2006 ON THE FILE OF' THE} E ABE'-£,M_  ' .
CITY CIVIL AND SESSEONS JUDGE, BANGALORE {C3_CH{N().n2},'  
D1SME8SENCx THE EA. FILED 1.1/0 39 RULES E 85'-'£'OF_:C'..PCV.F€3AR  

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION. 

THESE APPEALS comma oN""F0;é';fi;'£3i~Ji;~sg$:;:g7'i¥ 

DAY, THE COUR1' DELEV}§.RED T;§{E§ FOLLE}W'ENG: T  » .
'JUDGM§§3. V %
These two appeai;s"~~%&by    direciged
against two i11terjQcuto;fy%§§§dffi§f$'»   and
24.10.2608   Court of the
I Ad<1itit3I1a}€.£x1fi'é:_4v:;';~§i.'.':"  in the suit in
   order dateci

19.06.:20{)'Z,4' . the_   has allowsd the

applitgatian-}'.L%;'»3.,   fine respondent-plaintiff under

1 85 2 of the C.P.C. m restrain the

who is no other than his father,

V Vv _ fron:f<ii.is1:):<$s':;%;%§ssi11g him finm the suit propmty. $5: the

{}I'€i(31' dated 24.10.2008, the ma} Caurt: has

the app1i{:atior1~l.A.2 fiied by the appeIiant–

T " — ié§;'iEz1dant under Gram' 89 Ruies 1 8; :2 02° the C.P.C. {:0

y%yM

M.,F.A.N6.1 0545/200? Cfw
M.F,A.No.112£??f2098

restrain the respondent-plaintiff from disposses s.§" 1g_

him and his tenants from {he suit; property.

2. 1 have heard the ieamed cvtitiznsgi ;e

the parties and pczrused the ixnpu:g1}ei5€_'(§i*VdeZ1’3,V”‘ if

counsel appearing on txatsfi-.,:V§:”s~ides S1;§b3jI}A§.;fL”..:A?g;fiZ§i{‘
gmu11d floor cf the 3241:’. propei£§?_:-iS”~-tgnéfitéd. the
appeilant-cieihndant 1″(‘:I€1{; the
resporxdent-pigfixiféiifif is his iamily in
the flout the appe1′;iam~
de:*er1«:..:§::£ :sT’ pemon or me f’11’s’£:
floor sf aim; ~”‘l’11&y f11r1:he_r submit that

thesgtwq bédisposed Qf “by c:iire<:t;ing bath

"£123 ""pa;ri-56$ "£:n today tiii the éisposal 6f the Suit

V . 3. facts of the case, I accapt the joim

” V’ * vguhmisaiion mads by the §e3rnr.:*:d counsel an bath sicias

…f_-a’i:;d ‘d’:irect bath the partiea ta maintain Sta{1}S~qLlG in

T ” i*€i$p€ct of the suit promrgz as an today {iii the disposai

\1\§/

§L._F.A.NO.1§_545Z2;Q_{3Zw§§zi¥f
M.F.A,No’1120?_{24_Q 3

ofthe suit. The trial Court is directed to disposr:_

Sui: expeditieusly.

The appeals stand disposed;;:i”‘i;1. Lilia V

in modificaiien afthe {}I’d€I’S i1:1pugr}ei§._ herei:11., * . 2 V’ ”

Appeals disposed 0f.      '
*g3j, Tudge

shu-

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *