High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri D V Venkatesh vs The Sale Officer on 10 November, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Sri D V Venkatesh vs The Sale Officer on 10 November, 2010
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer


film

IN THE man (mum cm mmmram mt ff :_ A’

na’r1:1:-‘rm mm mm my car? NovEnm1%::§,A’_2V<}:$éij' , 3

3212533

'rm: Harmm mxamszzcgs s..a;a;$t-.:L A'

mm' @193 Na.34;35?"~§1i'» 0 zo"<;?s';A:=.§:':s
3 EN:

5121 n.v.vmImrEm,. . f

AGE43YI3’ARS

310 IAmn.valaKa?1:§PFA.,
n;.a’rna.1m;§.n{m;nz-,–:–_V ~

samam Hoz.31z:,i__ ” ‘
RABIAHAGARAH . 12331193312

@Y'”ss’zz:: .. .

um-o–w–w–e

,1«_ Prfxfs 3.31.3 céfmcsfi.

. ‘- vmmamn cammmnm
. ‘ -.,co._oBEaA*I1vE mm: LTD.,
_f34§I1V£i:2Y’13H’;$VAK,
K,GLR?C3AB,BflKGAI£)RE — 55:; cm

commctrons
Cf3.*C3?ERKHVE mm 139..
» A CAUSIERY BHAVAH,
.. ‘ * x,G.:zo:m, BAIIGALORE -~ saw 099
=__©lI,3P.BY1’1S zzqwmama

mzmmmnnemmnor

CC.$–OI”ERA’I$VE S{3C%’£’ES QEILE-443.}
Hn.L32, K.H.ROAI3,
BAHGALGRE — 560 (327. RESP(}HI3EI&”T’S

mYs3A’r;n.c.xAGAmRm,Hcs;:-m £302 23)

¢IIt2~–

‘IE WRIT PEYFIIOH I3 FQLED UNDER &E’}3CLE'”‘.2.’26j
227 OF TEE COHSHIUTIGH BF EVDIA, ”
QU’A%]SET-AmE ‘IKE FORM 130.8 {IHBER ”
VIBE C AH!) ALSO H93 _7i31’TBER V

s..3(2)(n3v11m D, D.&’i’ED e2;o5.2c:’z9 1SS’£¥”‘= np’i.z3r.’n53§

am Rmmmamr mm A3%TAH’r’»._R]?;GISTRAR’-. :3?”
ommmg socmms (RULE 44z3~__ rs’p_.132, ‘_3KA;fi.aa:::3;a1::,% ‘

nautsamas —- 560 02? ARI)

mm Wm’ rmrnon as zfzimr
Emma ‘mm mgr, ‘ma CQURT 1335333: mm Fonmwmaz

Lmrnefi ifqril 2133 fled a
mem to witmiraw the

Y _ Wit petifion is

d’m1’.nh5§’ed gs ma mats.

Sd/-: