High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Devaraja vs The State Of Karnataka on 23 June, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri Devaraja vs The State Of Karnataka on 23 June, 2008
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar


IN THE HIGH coum OF KARNATAKA AT 3Ar£ééALj¢§E

DATED THIS THE 23″” oA;v~o$%

BEFORE T n (
THE HON’BLE m.:rus12c’e Mayan sH;ar;:%:*.«w.£%«=;;§ubAR
wszrr p§nnoN%w3Q__.§§§?§0§%%Agm3 (KLJLREG)

BETWEEN:

Devaraja ‘
sic; Na13aP1ras;’–»v” _. * ‘ 4* ”
Aged abot1t35_;-yeazs
R/aAfikcIe”VT’ , ‘ ._
Janga:11ak6tx:.THobI§ifV ‘ ”

shjdlaghama ‘ –

Chickbs.-fllapma DisL”iét.._ ..Petitioner

(By Vefikatéiama Adv.)

%

._ ‘- .Rep”bf§_~.,i_ts’ to
‘ _ Revegguclfl-apartment
“Jidhana”‘Soudha, Bangal-om.

‘ ~ ‘I’he’*i’;ahsildar

_ Shidlaghatta
Shidlaghatta Taiuk
Chickballapura District.

3. The Ciammittce Authorised

For Regularisation of the

.2,

Unauthorised Cultivation of

Land, Shicilaghatta Taluk

Shidlaghatta.

Chickbaiiapura District : = — b
Rep by its Secretary. V . ..’RES_}1QBd'<3l1tS;.V;

(By Sri R. Kumar, GP.,)

This writ petition is filed '1.1iid_er An;-@1,es..V226 ":22? of "
the Constitution of India, prayifig to _dire<:'i:– "to ijsgularise
the unauthoriseci cuifivafion of'-the. petitioner respect of
the schedule land. f V,

This writ petifion hearing,
this day the madfithe' fo1Io\xzj;f_3g:w – '

{V .;%:Q.__E£EL$
of ootimnér is that the application
filed by «,3,fm. for regularization of his

unaum¢:~1£<y1 ' ocoi1p;é1ti_on::_".over the ma bearing Sy.No.61,

, '_ me§<12§311'i_zigV2 aoms_, ____ fiitixated at Ankara Village, is not

~con.<;i;ie:'edM as 'o.1_:_1 this; day.

Véfimument at Armexure-A, discloses that the

}:.ia"-9. filed application piaying for regularization of

x V' V.hx1s;L'u&1121i:1tho1*i2t:{i occupation of the land in question as far

— on 28.12.1998. According to the petitioner, the

” Eanxe is not considered till this day. Learned Advocate

V’

-3.

submits that the Committee for of

Unauthorized Cultivation of the Land is yet to

and the application of the petitioner w§li”»h{::~..c::b;ttsi<;1ezjéti" = b

immediately after the constitutionizpf = vésx

cf the aforermmtioned submissions; tortiervt isi" ;

made: –

The third respo1i€ic}t3i«(‘lr;§1:i§.i:1ittE:t§A_ 531*» Regularization of
Unauthofized Cffultgtvatioii”s1té§l¥tt:e:i§:.$ittt%r application {Bed
by the Iiftiff __ ‘a11jr-:ariy in accorciance

with law, as but not later than the
outer lixnit of date of coxtstitution, of

the Committee. _

V{tfit” pcfifioniié ofaccordingly.

Sd/—

t fudge