High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Devassy vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Devassy vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2009
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
IN 3'HE) HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA E71' BANGALGEIE

DATED THIS THE) 4th DAY $12' MARCH 2o0<;2M%'% ' 

BEFORE

THE HONZBLE Mr. JUSTKEE  :G{}'N§}Ai;--   ', 

WRIT PETYFEON N0.273E3 Q}? 2GI_3¥f5'{LAwB}§::§;jV':'_ 1 f; 

BETWEEN:

Sri Devassy,

S/0 Varghese,

Aged about 70 years, - _ .
R/0.949,, Qfid Stagrs,-',-- V  -- 
3"' Main, 'D' Bleak;  '
Rajajizlagar,  2  'V     .
Bangs-..£0re~56Q oga.  J     ...PE'I'¥TIGI~ER

(Sri Basavgga;    
AND: L

1. The State c;fK;aIi3é"itai{a,é
Remgl. by its Pri;vS:v::.' «  V

   2. 'i'hé"-Secrecizi; A

Hcmsing' 55 U1':'baI1 Devalopment
Q Depaxitmfint, M.S.Bui1ci:ing,

 ' " ' " -- __ : '"Ba:1ga£eri:t.

 ' The iiommisssioner,

   Bangalore Development Authority,
'  ...}3anga103:'e.

  " "4; The Tahasiidar,

Bangalore South Taluk,
Bangalore.



5. Special Land Acquisition Officer,
Eangalere Development Authority,
Bangalore.

6. The Nandi In;frastm1cm1*e Corridor
Enterprises, Repté. by its
Managng Direeter,

Bangaiore.  .  g ._  :;_ AA

(Sri Mlieshava Raddy, AGA {ere-R1, R2 and    
Eiliirishna, Adv. fer R3 and R5;--ve.Iu{i,:'zg a;1(1.Pai*tr'.idg7e, Aeiv.
for R6)   '  

This W? is filed m1r:1er 'AI't:ic'1e$'.2e26e azld 227 of the
Cbnstitufien of India praying :5 Set~«._asi{:ie_ tar quash the
endorsement issued b}«*r'R5-- .:c1ated=,_30;'.1.e20{)8 and direct
the respondent ;a':;1§:,'¥'1o1'§1;y 1:0-w~~7pae$"'a§wta_1fd and to give the

compensation ‘-:9 petifitieperq’ accordance with iaw

(AImexure–\§’)_. .;

T1:;1;s%%Lixz.e;§e1eco;;};ief:gfizgfjfergreiizninary hearing in ‘B’
Group uday, ‘e1e..n:;ade the fellowingz
e E R

.. 4’§jhiS*is the “:sex:g_:_:__1;f;(i time the petitioner is before this

top anaimost identicai relief. 11: is not in dispute

t};122§.’tiéeV’VSiA’3?’j§éeierxeasuring 35 ft x 40 fl: was acquired

‘ ‘.purs1;an1§§_:eVe~ fnal zzetificaticm dated 09.05.1994. ‘}’he

:.ee{n;:Sel for the respondents submits that the said site

____'”ew:i;§s acquired initiaily fer Banashankari 631 Stage but

“»hC2weVer, it is transferred t0 the fifih respondent

pursuant to a memorancimn of Lmderstandirig.

y’

However, we are not concerned with the same. Be that fl

_2./3′

‘befere them respect of grant of compensation

withixz eight weeks mereafier.

Rule is issued and ma.cic: absoimte « c:ixfLe;’1’i: * V V’

indicated above.

Sri Mxeshava Recziciifl./,,. ggdumz

Government Advocate is pemgitfizd of

appearance Within fouf

AI/–