– 1 M
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARRATAKA.AT BANGALQEfi _
D§T§D Tu:$ THE 24″‘§AY SF APRIL, $é@§J»fV.”
BETWEEN:
sax ERAMALLAP?A _ .- .
S10 BITLA MALLflPPA ,m, a’
AGED RBGUT é;»IEARS; ‘_J
ASSISTANT ?EAc5ERaHINEIé ,
SR1 3RINIvAs”H, ‘3.’aa vy’ ”
GUBBI, ?UM%URufiESTRIC?f.'” E .,. FETITIONER
{By st; $;?RRfiRSH»SHE?TY} A§V.}
AND:
».fi 1_~fiaE s?ATE”@§WHARNa?aKA
. “ay ITS EBUCATION $ECRETARY
,'”M.3;fiUx§D:NG
-:aR,AM§a§akR vgggmz
“aawaazoga-G1
‘. 2 THE EEUCRTIGN SOMMISSIQNER
xT FQR PUBLIC ZNSTRUC?EONS
» ‘*MRU9AIUNGA ROAD
‘=-EAN@ALoRE~a1
%”V.mé DERE$TQR OF PQBLIC INSTRUCTION$
i?RIMARY EDUCRTION?
NRfiPATHBNGR ROAE
BRNGALORE-$1
-2-
4 DE?UTY DIRECTOR 0? JBLZC :Ns?RucT:ogs 5,
TGMKUR DIST ” ‘-”
T%MKHR
Q BLQCE EBUCATION QEEICERMW
GUBBI TALUK
T¥_§I'”IK¥}R DI ST
SR: SRENEV s EQUCATIQNRL’f§U3T1 f»W
BY ITS MAN&GING TRUSTEE =.’.f; 1
SR1 K THZMMARJU, 3R:’sR1§1yAsA.NILAEA
SIDBAGRNGA EKTEESIGM} 4TH MAIN “” ‘
‘Tukfifijfi ‘» ‘ 2 a’. ~x~.*-
13″:
? ?HE HERD.MISTRE3SV
SR1 sazmzygs a,9,g;
gmaazflfi jf_ .’.I
yumaflg §ISTt. w§.’
z_. _ fie;
‘ . n i ‘ ‘ ‘
TUMKHR =fia”u V
9 _SRE SRIN:ya$V$§5éAT:@NaL TRUST
_;Ra?RESEN$Efi 9? SPECIAL OFFICER
-_’EQUcA:IQN’aF§ICER ~ EE,
.3 esszca OF DEPUTY DIRECTOR as
*?$gL:C_1asTRuCT:oNs
“.,TyMKgR,}?mMKUR BZSTRICT. ,.. RES?ON§€NTS
4%? £3′
-ux
ha:-@L?.sHR:m:vRs, Asa gag R1-5 a 9
RSZEBLET 3 V T.Q. :2.1.2$£3
“‘g 8 E 2
TRVFJ3;
THIS EAERIT PETITIQPJ IS FILES L§f\§DEIz'”<i EERMTICLE
.3'-$13'? Z-327 GE' THE CONSTITUTIQN OF I§'5.?C?I?1,
FI'i§i§:fIi"§f3 TC: BIKES'? THE RESPG3\i'I3'LEE"€'3"S TC) ?.é"-'ff TEES
W
»,.?aL33;R':»';' TC'? THE §ETZTIONER GTJE FROM APRIL 25305
ND .»'-EELSO TO .?'iI??RC}*\fE THE RECOMMENQRTEGIQ GE' 5153
E'
-14′)
-3…
GT. 9 R ZQQ6 {ANNEXURE 32} RS FAR R$ VTEE
PETITZONER IS COFJCZSRNEQEF.
THIS wax? PETITEf_’§\f iv€ING :~s_
PRELIMENARE’ HEARENG ‘:2′ rsaam THI3
C’:€i’»Ui’?;T E’?-‘a:’3f3EEI: ‘FEET; FC>LL’C}WI «G:
……………………………….._
The §eti-ione: wa aggfiintéd as fi3éi;:éht
J’
m
‘1 U}
,…..4 ..
fiimdi teacher a
Tzust, Gubbi, Tumkur ;i$fi:ict.én§ fiéfiied him
atj its aches} ‘S51 Szigivasax Hf%+$. Efiubbi,
Tumkur Distxict, ?id@f:apQu;ntment order at
anne,>::.V:V::锥~;r«.– .. ff, rjaiffféd . ;Q”;”:’987. Ema said
appointment -waé* am@:Qved by the comgetent
1
FU
CW
*1
53;,
t I)
*1
$2..
:1.»
(“V
(13
$4.
autho:it§V* $5._}pé: ‘°Rnnexu§e
.21?1§$?; The 963: in questifln was admitted
F}?
“t®TS&lax?U*rant a Ber the ezder at Ennexure~
*Qrant€d annual increments a5 3
‘RnneXure~C2 dated l6.Zl&l99
‘V.”‘gfian:ed tim@ bsuna
. :55”
<3: }§at:_eé:1~ 1:5-.11.': 99:3. The
lC1I'1€:'.3"_' W535
':
(E)
{“1”
[Mr
F?”
9 asder at
(E?
F”:
E”?
33′
amj he w&$ also
1!}
incyement as per &nnexar@~§
ah
F-4
‘0§der datad l6.9.2GQ3. The Deputy §’:@ct$r of
Sf;nivésa’HEduma£i0h*
-4-
hereini cancelled the Order admitting the;§Qst
in nuegtion to saiaxy grant as -9: finfie£uf@#?3
“iAI.?.§\Io.l3I34_1’0l. This cant: ma”-::_ts oidér «data»
3.3QG5 remanded the zfiatter’.baa£ lifim the
concerned DDPI with a directién ta §éCLfl$id€£
the maitar in acsmrdanéfi with i$w@f.It is aiso
was Qé;d the salary §:¢m 1997 to 2691 as was
fhfi ardep at Afifiexfirémfil dated 3.3.2301 and
aqafihufiis salary paid till March 2805 &s per
“.@etitiéner was iasued with a shew cauga notice
.j_£ai£in§ upon him as to why the $ala§§ giant
(‘T
O
u”fih@ ,0st ifi -uestiQn shauld not be withdzawn.
Tha petitionar baa sent a detailed regly to
in
-5-
§§?E has passed an GEd@f at &nnexu§e–MVéated
2w.3.2Gfi? withdrawing the salaxy grant t§ Ehé
id past. The getitioner has
U;
SJ}
.5}
E:
:13
U}
r”‘
r*-‘
l”‘<
,i–":j ,-
:3.
“f”
13′
I3}
appearing fer the -etiiio§er submit% that
petitiGn@:Z wé$<'appeifitcd" to the DO$t in
quest$0fi as p%z the éydér at Annexuzewfi daied
2G.1G.l93? andgh§S*appointment was approved by
'W_ thékc@mQetefit-auth0rity as per the order at
'Rfinexufe%% dated 2.ll.198?. The pest in
fiué3tiCijw:5 admittai to salary grant as p@r
the "érdé:T at .RnfieKure~C and h@ was granted
»ahhual increments and tima bound increments
vfrom 'time ts time. CH1 an earlier' occaSien
wh@n the §eputy Director sf Public
InstraCti0n$, Tumkur, uailaterally withdrew
the 3a1aryT grant to the post in question,
<13
m
Qetitionez Chailenged. thT sam@ befare thi
E
212
2. Sri ?raka5h §fiéttv, *1ea:hsdfi”cou§sel=
accordanfie with law. Thexeaftei¢’H:the
petitianer filed a d®tailedfiQbje¢tiQh$*t¢Vfihe f
shew cause natice issued by ihé D§PEgnTumKuf
E14″ resxp-snderzt herein). x,»éith<;n.1t
considering the o@i@¢§icn$";haé_ gassed the
impugned order. _~Ififi is: a:.aeg" that the
impugned Qtfie: is .uhilaterél in nature and
igned bay the 5%"
{3} 2
that no 3f€3;’8.S’%3:’1?;;%f as
A’. ‘3;:.hé; tha ether hand, learned ECG?
axing, {$3 the respendent has sought t0
xi) ‘
Q?
‘ lzlj ‘
jus ify thé impagned order.
4. A perusal of the impagnad Qrde: showfi
u”that the reasons assigned by fihe DDR1, Tumkur
for withdrawing fihe post in questiea frsm the
salaty grant axe, ii) thé Ofdef passefi by this
he
-7-
agar: in iAI.’£>.§w’c:«.13t3§/’C%1 filed b:?<.f'_.._%;;?:e
petitionar is in favour cf the de@&riménfv$h§ .
satisfactory. As noticed above this»rofir$_iu
W.P.No.1364_/€31 has f:.3ér*z<:i'~–._faul-*:,'witfévi"'t.§2e.,_{;;:rder–.L
passed by the am: aim has
directed the EDP: rd reqcgaldér the matter and
'-3
:1}
pass apprGpriatem"=ordérs_' :héréQn. h
petitioner haéqsefit a defialiéfi reply to the
Show cau$e hdticeg* ?herDD§I has reéected th@
5*-E
re_l$ h@ldihqafih§t it is net satisfactory.
'5L 3»C@fisequemtly; the writ Qetition
su¢¢eéds and it is accordingly aligwed in
V.pa::. N The order at Amnexure~M 23.3.2GG? is
hfierébv' nuashed Qnl;r inr SQ far a3 the
..»..\u
petitiuner is cemcernafl The . respundent
is directed ta reconsider tfi@ matter in
-3-
accardance with law and in the light of tfia
obsexvatiqns made abave. it is neediesfiwtéfisfiy,’
that pending rdisposal of the ‘a:ifi””@étition, u
the department is baund to pay«:5éaSaia§yw:u;
tje pfititioner. fie costslx