High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Eranna vs Jayathirth.S.Galagali on 9 December, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Eranna vs Jayathirth.S.Galagali on 9 December, 2009
Author: H N Das
 ....W..,  mmmmm I"!l'¢Wrl ...,W... W Mmamm mt'.-in c0_uR"r or: KARNAYAKA H16-H com" on: xnmmwca HIGH con:

la I-'HE man coum' ore' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
mmn 'mm THE 0913 am or nmmmmz 2009 
mm     
um aozmm ma. JUSTICE 3.n.maaxom$I:fW*§v1 "   = 

 

am Emnm

am mnzzma    

may 40 mm  
1356/2, Pwnqmwmn-3 _  <
mnmmam soc 09¢.   M  V

1 JAYATa:a2'1H3 
PRESIBEJCT, Kamxmxa memmwm
SEGRETARJAT 'EMPI.GY'EES HOUSING
 Imp

% %   .2003; 3:21:15, 21% noon

 %   azzxmm,

 L2  =sEcm'm1zv

'  KA%1fi"fi'I'AI{A LEGMATIIRE SECRETARIAT
  AA EEEPEOYEES HMISIHG C0-OPERATIVE LTD
 ,  KO 216, 2" FLOOR, WDHANIX scxmnn.
 Iéfiiflfialfi-Sil

'   JOHIT mexsmm or co-opsnxrxvn

SOCETIES,



BAN GALORE EGION,

BANGALORE 
 REsm1mEnTus %jT%Lk

(BY snm K.N.SI-EVAYOGISWAMY, HCGP FOR   ,f  _
um w.1=-. 13 man UNDER AI%'IICL_1?.~3   . T  % « '. 

2:27 01? 'mm coxsnmxox or 1313b'-1,  Tc). 
DIRECT TI-IE RESPONDENT M2110 

AHEAD WITH TEE ALLO’l’MZEHT 0F.__Sfl_’ES,
FORMULATING ma szmom-1″! LIST
URIFORM PRICES ma nwrmmes Am A$.*30’E}IATE
mmaks AND DIRECT um mazsmm 01?

CO-0PER’l’NE SOCETIEE: THE
nmznm APPLICA’I’IOH 3? ¢¥li’B1i%Mn/5212609
AND nmom Tm: 8AME;VDt}’E:’T¥11″!i§£E’_’,.URGEHCY
IH\R3LVEDH§1’I-E*9\I8PUTE..l”A ‘ k

‘mus w._P.

rmmme  ar, mm um

 

Sri    , learned  t

  take notice for reopondmm

ofthe. pcfltionw in that the third.

‘mama to considnr and pans appmprinte

rm Imsxocumry Applieaflon med by the
V in dipum Eo.JRB]MD[5’2I2009 petzxfmg :11:
file. Ha prejudice win be: caused to tha third

gwww M Wnummmm MW”?V-“‘5?” Mmwmmaw WW’ VMWKE 1» iv-mmmnrsn mm:-1 amrum ur KAKNAEAKA mun c;uuR’z’ or :<ArmA1';AKA Hmart cvum

respondaentifa diractinniaimsuedmpassappmpa-inns

A/7%"

I7/

ssaawwna vr nnmvncnnn nswnuvflfit. mgr-afllizvninman nlwrt HUUIU V!’ lfiflltflfiéfllkfl l’!l’£:il’l’l..’UUK’!’ WI” l§AKNflJAKfia HIGH CQURT Q? KhKNATAKA HIGH CQUR?

orderahaamordanoowithlawonthepending

application in the disputa pending hefinre
ax.-pedftiously as possible and in any event, _
mans froxn the dam ofreoeipt of: mg: of T V %

3. The burned Comte]

that tbc firat is.”

aumpm in ragiaming oft§d’1’na”£Ewf mg
anouaea. If that in ac. by the
rm mpunam «snug dispuha
pemns A

4. with the writ petition is

v In file mm of ap®m1aoe £01′

‘ ‘ ‘ 3within three weeks from today.

sd/-

JUDGE