High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri.Fayaz vs The Divisional Manager on 8 December, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri.Fayaz vs The Divisional Manager on 8 December, 2009
Author: Subhash B.Adi


Wu uw’w\HmmmMsawA-as MMWW MWWWE *».»5’¥.'” mmmwfiumflfi. WEMW K.«§n?i3@€”§u

_’ Wggttir.” _

.. 3. ..

3: 23m Efififi GQURT me’ KmR’A’§’AIiA AT BAKGfii§§E’;.: %
QQTEE ms Tm am my me Basfigmagéfiwgi

BEFSRE;

*5»-m E-:§:§*3LE ha. J{}’S”§C5E 1 ”

31% Fayaz, ”

$33: S.&.Km&-13:3
Ris.I§793?’§fE§ __ ”

1* Stage;

‘E’i’3m5Rsa;d, .

_ ” .,.fiPPEsLIA.?€T

(By 32% gm ;h ., ‘ 7

RKE:

, “I5’i*m; fim ifL’ii?a. fisssummfia, L€§.,

Sam:

E&§”§_}-iFLs¢£’,– B%as:=ée.r S§m,

V ‘ ‘§’e$hvw&:::§11c::,é%=a§

, . gfifififiifififiiffi

{By $5 Rfifiajug Aam;

wmmm is neewms x «MW-w-::«,t wk” .<~w~»*zir:'t»:r~a1§veax-xa-a.!-M"ss,.¢"\e i\."$¥%.;M'"'é MW

' ifiéiéia»-fiaifixzgr

Zifi-°'A am U3°s.3Q{1}Ea.} fif 'W33. fiat

Judgemmt ms: Award aa2m*::2§.:$2m3

smmpezzsatimi.

‘ibis appaal mzimkg sfi
Smart dfiiismmé the fs1.1m§m:- ‘

E-Imr& Eeéay of 133
aays in with mnsmt,

mafia ..ftak¢91.’;. fig: V5,if43}&¥;:_:6.és’§:1aesaa.i,§

2, R§.§;aj;:$ Qmxmai is fifrmtaefi m m

SIG aygi is {mfg with rfiwé ta

Ea E-2 ?$

igtizatiha

émfigr mnmxtifim ifi fifm

‘: :. Qmzmei aim $uhw§t*m& fimg fim gm:

fiamré. $2? i§$:§fi€&E E at Q33

‘- 31% gffiiiifi

raga 3? ?’§v§%§ fifim fig fiam 3? €333 fiw éata sf

W’CA{P«$C{QR.§a..i3fQ%*§r an the 32$ af’ tbs L&b§:.if= V
Gfiw wzd Qcsmmrmkgisrsm far fiarkmen Qmaigzéxmatézsn-,
31.1% Bisrisiezi-3, Bargains; {;:§aim_ grsrétitiefi
far aammssetizfin and seaidzg ,.er1}<ia.:;:¢ems¢%:t' if–.gri'=::;

~ «-«-ww-x W-¥'”1f %e’%fi”9im?K§ R3?

m § …..

dimgesai mzé 12% iztttwmt mm the data sfjudgngz-Qt:..

gmymzmmtj éegsiig whiakvw is earisler.

4g in vim o§i3:2fi abtme ausmiaggan;

e:t’fi:Et1e& is inmras: at ?a»a% fir§n::._’t§:eV”z2a%e gef

me am 3:’ dispvemi am 22% we 2

fill paymmztg’ dgepeait, ifs’ _

35 Sri F.$.E3§,§§2§ pa*mi’£:te& ta

am a mama if fiaraeém frem tgéay,

Sci/-

JUDGE