Sri G Renugopala Reddy vs M/S Indus Homes Pvt Ltd on 14 September, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT -0? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 14"' DAY OF SEPTEMBER,

BEFORE

THE HON'Bi.E MRJUSTICE MOHAN sHANTAAi;AGoiuoAi§' » 

C.M.P. No.3oh9/zoos',  A' "
BETWEEN _; V'  

Sri.G.Renugopa|a Reddy,   

S/o Iate I-i.Gurappa Reddy, 49 years,"-._

R/o No.68/3, Thimma"«--R.ed,d';/ R;_oad',€}- 

Appa Reddy Paiya, Ind-ira.nagfar',  "

Banga|ore~560=038.  Q  
      'Pr--;T.ITIoNER

(By Sri  Advocate)

AND:

M/s Indus. Home~sjPvti.i,td.,,,,..

Indus Homes Pvt.i;t,o

(A Pvt.1.td';.-~ Com_p'any_ incorporated
ungdeyr the Intjian companies Act, 1956)
h--:--N'in:g.,its. Registered' Office at No.30,

 *1.4"' Cross,7l1"' Main Wilson Garden,
  Ba'rTiga'!ore¥'5,§0., O27.
_ RepreSe'n.t_ed,,'i)Vy its Managing Director,

S_riV.B.!3ha\{;e:'deep Reddy.

.. RESPONDENT

  Sri Vardhaman S.Gunja|, Advovate.)

This CMP is fiied under Section 11of the Arbitration
and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying that this Hon'ble Court

may be pleased to appoint any person who is having sound



technical qualification with regard to the Joint
Development Agreement dated 2*?-2004 to adjudvica_t"e.the

dispute raised by the petitioner vide his Iegai no_t'i'ce'*d'ate«d

16«-10-2009 as per clause 41 of the Joint oeveippnieirit 

Agreement dated 2-7-2004

This CMP coming on for  

Court made the foi|owing:--  

   

Petitionerggand   into a Joint
IZ)eveiopment_" A    =  An nexu re-A
dated    land owner where as
the  """    a lbuiider and
deveiop'e.r."  of the construction certain

disputes haveflarisenix-between the parties. The same are

 not V.re°soi\}'ed evenwéby exchange of notices. Thus the

:VpetitAi'ovn'erV" Vgigssfues notices to respondent invoking

airbiitravtionvii}ciiausXe found in the agreement between the

 gpagrtiessi'Ultimately this petition is fiied under Section 11 of

A2.t'he..u5Arbitration and Conciiiation Act, 1996 praying for

 V. .....appointment of arbitrator, for adjudication of dispute

between the parties.

R-5



2. It is not in dispute that the dispute has arisen

between the parties. Sri.Vardhaman, learned couls-nei.._for

the respondent fairly submits that the dispi§{te"co'u:l_d

resolved by arbitration. Clausefii of"'tide-:,'_vva'g'reement~'.ll'

between the parties is the arbit_rati_on..:'clau_se.:' However,

the p-arties have agreed forresolution of the'v:d'isp:_:_tVefl  

appointment of one arbitrator-..:ea.ch aridl_:arbii%:rators so
appointed may choosefan bun21»pvi'.re';.',jvv[j'uring the course of
argument bothathe counsiei  sole arbitrator

may be  Z: 

:'l3;"'H'ayiiing  the_"'t'otality of the circumstances
of the'.case this'tiioulrt_:ils~-.,sa~tisfied that the matter may be

resolvedthrough}.alrblitralltion. Accordingiy, the matter is

 refeirre.d to Ar'b'it'i*ati'on. Hence, the following order is

   V

ORDER

~~_Jxu;stice G.Patri Basavana Goud, No.58, “GANGA”

Road, Judicial Officers’ Layout, RMV Extension,

V’,Bangalore–560 094, is appointed as Sole Arbitrator, to

resolve the disputes between the parties. The learned
Arbitrator, on receipt of a copy of this order, shall enter

upon the reference, issue notice to the parties and then

\/’

proceed to resolve the dispute, in accordance with the

provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation

Office is directed to send a copy of

learned Arbitrator, forthwith. __It.. is furthe’r:’_’;diVrecteVd

return an the original papers, if:”–..any_”,f~fiied._a’io.ngA”»%§!ii’th”f’ithe

petition to the petitionei*fV__vto_ enable .t_he.Tp:e’t*iti.oner to

produce before the Eearned Arbitvrato_r.
Petition is disposed of