High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Gangappa vs Sri C Muniyappa on 11 April, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri Gangappa vs Sri C Muniyappa on 11 April, 2008
Author: N.Kumar


In:

In mm mm! GOURT or Imnlmrmut A1′

I.”\.-‘.4-….’l at-‘I-.£.. III..- I “I ; –
LI-RIC” I-lllfl LIIC 1.1″‘ ‘Y

.3…-ET_’.3!_E.3.L3£1.;

Srifiaagappa V
S/o late ChikkaJ’C31UW€iappa.«i ‘ ‘
Aged abou’L_6–5 yfsam _ V ‘
Resident of _ V ”

Ko1 _ 3 ” Viilagé’- ., V
Kasabaflcabli.

Kolar._’I’aluk H

_% % . t

, in… 551.: D ¢i;.=.I..-1.4..- n…:-.a..- A.A.mn_n4;\
~. \I_IJ u g 1 _J\ _ _

gmm iyappa

‘ no

A S} .!_n’tga’ ‘Cliikkaehowdapipa

62 yams

‘~ (‘1 at-v:Il’|’:In’.I¢|I:In
I-II»-I ‘|-I KJIIIIIVZHZ

_ VS/0 late Gopanna
Aged about 46 years

3 ‘ Sri Shaka!’
” S_lo late Gopanna

Aged about_38 years _ ‘I %

13%

‘–‘I

10

‘.”‘”F .

,4-4

_ 12

|..n –

in 1′

Sri Manjunatha

Sic late {‘m%..*’-ha

Aged about 36 years

Sri Chandregowda
S/o late B G Ramaiah
Aged about 41 years

Sr: § ”

‘.510 late B G Ramaiah

Agw abziul 59 5&3

Slo late B G
Aged abcfiii yf1§al’3′ V.

sri 1
3,19 1-.=-.+.-.2 v. .1.-!I_in,._in1i’.w:§_2m1«e-Lair;


  '

is M    %

Si 0  V 
Aged about  ytms

    sfi M W   ma

‘ gsjqlatn;-. V hiuzflvwkamppa

Ag:-,.-.1 “e_.b-nut -38 year;

nnuurnwuu

* %’~ai”;auwmu5r’

3/ahire v Munivenkatappa

,.§_?ig==¢i’~~’aioout 36 years

S10 late V Munivenkataypn

-Ari Rav1.’.1:I__-mI_=_v’

S] olate V Munivcnkatappa

.._J ..’I–.n.u- A
Pagan uuuut 3-: years

14

15

pa
(35

17

18

19

S1-iPSrinivaan

Q}- I_.|._ 1! Il_..__..___

-1110 lam V. ra

Aged about 40 years

Sri Gangamju
S] 0 late V Papanna
Aged about 38 ycagg

Sr}. ‘.’w..w.’r-=*.e=he=.
S] 0 late V Papanna
ageu’ ” about 36

Sri R V ‘

S’/o late
Aged al)t,m’l :35 y:_t’:ara’ ‘~

Sri

Q In: In!-Ar Dpncnéa-«unfiy ” V.
wlv .|a6I.vI.g :\_,LiI.|.ImwI.£§.:-In-I. .v –

vA&;<:«1%'s:1_1im~; :30 " V
R

about .31

Sri Govindaraju

Sri Sumsh

(1;-ntrfln

JD-

28 Sri Dodda Gangappa
29 Sri Clicmpanna
30 SriCNamyanaGowda

Respondeznts 20 to 30 all
Sons of late Dodda Cmwglappap

3 1 Smt. Ammayamma

W19 _|-3.!-;-. Mzmjygppa V _
Dlo late Dodda Clwwcfiappg ..

Agar} sham. 56 r

CL’!
10

Sri C’; I I .. V’
Slo !at.e’E}9§Eda Lfhqwciappa ..

Allan: ”

“§¥;?;.i’l.-;!.’~1.1$–_._!’n’Iiié’~;».:*’:_sa_11;a1li
IVKaaaba’HVehlil – l

– _.’1:.._._ r’-.-..1_-1.’é. .
.u:a:u xmum.

I{e.1ar.Disttic5tE- ‘ mfieapondenta
(ByvVS’11’i W1′ éayamldi. Advocate for R1)

1113 100 of CPC against the judgment and

EL,

T–2~;=:le;:a*;e-.i~.2cs-2-2005 pt.1ee:d. in RA. No.1En’.2,lQ003 on the 111;

.:<

O

"l'=lll1e'PV1iesViAt:lVi1lg Ofliuer and Additional District Judge, Fast

' mar-

‘ -. I I

-auk. ~-nirfi-‘l”v’, Kala?-, dim1firu’1g’ the at-“paal aft-1′.-aw’-“…’.ng

the zjizglgmcnt and doc-me 2-7-2003 panned In 08

-3
«.1;

JIII U. ‘9 I

fi0.3i3[f£0CK5 an the iiie of the iuidiflonai uwu uuuge (J1-.fiii.)

This RSA coming on for orders this day. the Court

delivered the following: I V

14!

N6 refrresefitafifi. ” ]

nouvpnucuiion.