WA.1625/G8
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 7111 DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2009
PRESENT _ ' V ' V
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V. qQ1éALA__ _ "
THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE i«:_.__ 131+iA1{T}:Avx_&iS;_;1}£§V .
WRIT APPEAL N 0. 1625/ 2608 % {KLR/vRR§_Sx;j:R)
BETWEEN:
Sn'.G0paI Rae Yadhava,
S/osharnarao,
Aged about 76 yearsfi ' ' A
R/ 0. Hanumanapa1.aya
Mahadevapura Dakha;1é',_,
Kasaba Hobli, .... , _ .,
Nelamangala Taluk;~ _ 7'; '
Bangalore DiS7f_. ' " '
(Benefit of Senicr V V ._ ._
citizenship not C1'ai;ned)."' 2
(By_S1i.Sha.1§ffiukhap;:$a.K}S, Adv.)
AND; S =
1. The"'§T:a{f1_sAiidaf';'_~v.,v._
V . , vNe1ama,r1'ga1a Taliuk,
Nelamafigala, ' "
_ . _ .BaQga10re Dist.
« V _ 'S .AI\/Ié;favEfi1:ataiah,
o.*l_at'c Huchagangaiah,
Aged 45 years,
R'/'a-.Anchipura viiiage,
V V" ._ Kasaba Hobii,
. . .APPELLANT
WA.1625/O8.
Nelamangala Taluk.
Bangalore Rural Dist. ...RESPONDENTS
(By Srnt.Asha M.Kumbaragerimath, HCGI3 for R-1)
This writ appeal is filed under Section 4 of the
Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in the;’_’Writ’jP_etition_
No. 18281/2007 dt.25.8.2008.
This appeal coming on for preliminary dlayill
Dr.Bl~lAK’I’HAVA’I’SAI.A. J., delivered the fOllowing:– .
JUDGMENT ‘ 1 ‘
In this appeal. the correctness’ order
made in Writ Petition No.182″8.l_/200″?’ th’e.._fi1e ot”‘lea”rned single
Judge of this Court is questioneddfi it .:’
2. Learned’-Couensel:’-~for.rthey:_:appe1lant submits that the revenue
authorities erred’*:i,n not the entries with reference to the
larrfi beafifig ‘Survey l of Hanchipura village, Kasaba Hobli,
Ne1’a,rn»anga1a.%lL’a1ul§§”~–l3angalore District. in terms of the Sale deed
dated” eifceeuted by one Siddayallamma. He further
vlflsubmits ‘the’ learned single Judge erred in not quashing the
gl.oridei:,:ciate.el 03.08.2007 made by the Respondent No.1/Tahsildar in
No.23/2007~O8.
3. Learned Govt. Pleader submits that there is no illegality or
einfinnity in the impugned order.
E
\~.,__m__..,..—-“”‘ ‘
WA . 1 6 2 5 /0 8
4. The case of the appellant/ petitioner is that he requested the
revenue authorities to have the entries in the revenue records
mutated in his name in pursuance of the sale deed” dated
19.07.2006. Learned single Judge has noticed the dispute.p_beltiw_een
the parties in ().S.No.36/2006 on the file of Civil Jgi’d’g;{‘;{gi1in:_¢1–e_p
Division), Nelamangalan On account of rival c]_.aim,..’::the’~»,reVer1_ueu0
authorities have directed the appellant to:=.seels;.
the Civil Court. Therefore, the learned__ singq”ie_J there;
was no good ground to quash the orlderplliolfj the Tahsildar
and dismissed the writ petitionofiiwefsee ground to entertain
the appeal. A
5. In fails and the same is hereby
dismissed.
“V(}1″an’teditliree.flweeksmtime to file memo of appearance by the
Z _ Govt.1P1eader. .. 0′ . V
Sd/w
RIDGE
Sd/~
EEIDGE