IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DATED THIS THE 9"' DAY QF DEC~DA?ITBERIT[2I>o9 @ T. BEFORE: . 7 THE, HONBLE MR. JU$TICE AN/$I4D BDYR_jA~R,EE')DvY WRIT PETITION NoV.ITI~5éfs;;3» OF 2009' I<:M:°CPC') BETWEEN: ' Sri.G0p:;I}2. :I?;IIIi;Dz_1--§la~I _ Age aboilt " J : SDn_.Df..SIIbb_a" P':;.;Ig1bad.a,.__ ' " Residing ziififl E1'g£13J,}vE;1tfi H.(_)1iS€, . B01iya1I*"Gmm:1..f'-~ % Mz1IIg2.fl_()T::A. ' V PETITIONER p(I§'y' SE1I'i.Na't:'IIffij:I Bm-II, Adv<:)cate) . r 'h x ' 'Vastiéiévu Bhandary, 1.
,
Agtzd about 54 Years.
,Son of Aitha Bhzmdary.
Sadananda Bhandary,
Aged about 50 Years,
Son of Aiiha Bhandz-1I*_v.
Both residing at
M ‘d gu:1z1II(Ei House.
B01 iyzu” GraInz-I,
E\/[zmgui<:):"e. RESP()NI)EENTS
5
TU
.r. .5. .- ..;. .3.
W ., 4< .i. .,.
This Writ Petition is filed under Artie.1es”‘226?,iyand ziztpi
the Constitution of lndia praying .to~q.uyash.’theiortier”pa_s»seé_by is 2
the 2″” Additional Civil Judge (Senior..Di,visio’ny) ‘M’angalog:_e,’ in V
M.A.No.8/2007 by its order dated} 25;.l(i’).20()8_vi~dVe ,A:li1€’_.Xu1f_e–
A and also the order of the.._Civil._Judge :{‘J”t:fniQ_r D_:§iviisio_ii_’,.
Mangalore, Dakshina Kannada in O.S.N.o.2.7_l_/()6; in”ii.A.N().ill
by its order dated: 6.3.2007 vi_de”-Annexureéfl. and et;c.,
This Writ Petitiio’niiic-orn.in;fg’ .sp’tel_iminary hearing this
day, the Court made thet’ol.io’N_ing: i’ V’ A
The “aggrieved by the dismissal of the
appiieatitin of injuiiestions which was carried in appeal.
:iiii:Th锑~–.Film iiiii ‘Appellate Court having dismissed the
~_ “appli’eiii_t_iori~i;’f’i’l.ed by the petitioner. the petitioner is before this
by way of writ petition. The contention that the order
A ‘passed is without application of mind and without considerat.ion
of the prima facie material on record cannot be interfered by
this Court in its extifa~<)i"dinai'y jurisd.i.etion under Article 227 of
the Constitution of India.
8
2).}
Hence, no ground made out for inEe;.iféreVnc_é’L-:ia;d 7the4_
petition stands is rejected.