Sri Gubbi Somappa S/O G S … vs The Executive Director(South) on 26 August, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 26"' DAY OF AUGUST 

BEFORE

THE HONBLE MR.JUsT1cE RAMAA»MOHAN"REDOY: - _  u

MISC.  :.NO.6424;{20;;§_-Q. 3
W.P.i\EO.8929/20 i'é}x{S~PR(3)'---  ' 
BETWEEN ;

SRI GUBBI SOMAPPA s/ONO S..HANl1}1ViAN'i'--HAPPA
AGED ABOUT 35.&fEARs;_' '   - 
R/O No.10, EAST  1v;A1'N"ROAD_  
JAYANAGAR, 'z':fi"'H.._'*'i?.*r?I31.;Og:.1§    ' A
BANGALORE   ' '  A 1

 """        PETITIONER
{By Sri: :3 RA.1U*s;  G, ADV.)

AND;

 . ;_.  EXECUTIVE __1)iRECTOR(SOUTH)

sv

_ "FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
 'iZ..Oi'~l.?'~}LOO.F}?I_(3E, HADDOWS ROAD

  M.ANA(.'xER[KTK)
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
 REGIONAL OFFICE
 * No.10, EAST END MAIN ROAD
V. _.JAYANAOA:R AW "T" BLOCK, BANGALORE

 RESPONDENTS
THIS MISCJW IS FILED IA 8/8 351 OF CPC ALONG

3 " A.FF'IDAV}T PRAYING TO RECALL THE OR 



DATED 20.7.2010 DISMISSEB FOR NON-PROSECU'_i'.I_ON
IN THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION. T "

THIS MISQW COMING ON FOR 
THE COURT   ' ~

HEARING THIS DAY.
FOLLOVVING:

ORDER

The explanation offered’V”tb;f’the depe’Iz’ent:’;§in the
affidavit accenzpanyingiltlxe can llxerdly be
said to be satisfactory. be-clgtulselb be tested

since it is nottvknovwn at s_vl1.2it”ti£ne-..tIf;efe was a traffic

jam and *siivhe;I’eV are not documented.

Nevertheles’S;”‘ir1. ,A(‘:3.v.1:’j’df5IV”‘:§”.:(5’ d’d.jt1stiee’V’t6lVthe petitioner. the

default order €i;lte:l_ the petition is

recalled. Applliealtivnnl is Aailotssed and the writ petition is

xjestored to f_ile.V

Sdf
Judge