Sri Guru @ Nanjegowda vs Sardar Pasha on 4 November, 2010

x flfi;.?~¥£}&1.{3RE~S§Bfi4i’

.?i*rm agmmm msummcm camnm LEETED,

S??? BRAKCH, N6. 1: 1, €1(}HR’0UGfi’I’ RGAII),
QUEENS READ (E3958,
BA.HGa%1.fi1EE»»560Ci-41

BY ITS BRAECH EAHAGER.

RE;”i’z:?9l§§EFE’1.’$

[Hf $81: C.8 REEIDY, ADV. FQR Rfififil)
RI & R2 $ER.’J’E§)

MFA FILED {U8 1′?3(I} 0? BER?’ ACT’

mnsnmm Am: AVIAEED mmn: 29.4.2009 _;’rass;E3:u~l’ 13¢’.
EEVC H0. aszzam an TEE mg 0? THE (Z-;tVfi.~JUI3GE*
{$2.919} Arm gum. MAST, cimarmmyamrzim, ‘?§.RT1:{ u V. ”
ALLC3WR§’G ‘rm cmm ?E°’I*i’1″I€)§?f-‘f””‘F1£}RA a:Qm91:~:2a’3gx*r:o2<a*,
Arm smmm Emmncmmm c:F..;:,o,m9.t«:N3ATxC:N;v[j'-L

mm APPEAL cmmm -an mg"

THIS BAY, THE mum nmnwrsgim 1?£’LLl€)§éT[HG:-
LE? GM . §VT ._ :

This’ appeal £3 ‘%!;ft1e”e:Lid1Jtr1aI1.3V5:’ ‘ gnhatacemcrzt

af compcnsafimifi,

2, __ .F§:5i*”csf oanvenience, the pariiw are

referred’ A ta in the claim petition

tin:

: bfiéf faota of the case:

V when the ctiaimant was

. txaim11ing=a’}c:ng with a.notkxer:tgarryir1g mmnut in an

H H ” Eit.:11;.er 3.§::.$n’y’ bearing xwktration Pia. EA-*6-?’59’9, near

–‘ Gate} the driver af {km mid. lorry straw that

“Same in a. rash and mgligmt manner and dashed

%,

against another timber marry bearing

r%’o.CRQ-‘?SfiS Gaming fiom Chan:1aray&patr1a;,’*V..:’£s§§”-,3′

result, the ciaimant sustained irzjurim. Hexiée;

a. ciaim psetmon bcfare MP£’T’,

seeking eempcasation of . ‘A ‘

awardeci him a

interest at 6% p.a.

4. as ‘there rcgardm g

mcmmnm liability of the

insurar” cf’ §§’s:x1ca..”ing. ‘ V’ the 01113′ paint that
arises 1f:}r” the appeal is:
_ 2 aempensafion amrdcd
ia just ansezi reasonabie err

fer erzhancamcnt?”

hearing the ieamw ceuxzsel

the partiw and wmssixig the judment

‘ «sf the T1-munai, I am at’ the View that the

‘ awarded by the Txibutxal is mt just and

g,{.

rcasanahlc} it is an the mum” aim and hang: it is
required tea has cnhanacd.

6. The claimant has sustained the
mguxim-

a3 Fraacture diakacafion (R3 rm gaiafisargg %

bi Open fi*a:::ture b0th”b35011e$ 1.(L}_ V’
with lactzratcd

bangs V V ~ 1
c} Fmcture dishcafiagx {L} ‘fmi; {

The injuries are

evidant finm the & 5, out

pmimg,sag; E;i:P«1é%;?’k-éazgesaxaem Ex.P«17 £0 19,
d1a.a.b’ 4ce:tii&:%:at¢» Xwaya Exsf-21 and

suppr_::z_r1:e§;I ef the claimant and

who mamxh ed ax Pwa-1 and 2

, an Grthopedie Surgmn from ST.

who treated the claimnt has stated.

‘E disability 02’ 45% is the left Zmver limb

A {:3 {ha right lower iimb.

fir

‘E’. Cemsidcring the nature of injqriaa,

m.40,am/- awarded by the Tribunal tawarrsisfl

mad sufiering’ is on the lower sac: and it

ha enmmed by another 1%.s,<3c9/5 R

RIIA-5,000! – under 1:113 head.

8. The 01%’ t ” L’

for m.5#,465_/- a:1dfi:h¢ 8. sum
of Hs.3e,am1- tawaxfi ‘A j : stating

that the bflk i5 net

calculaaaci ._ ;’ ”*%g+a§;arate1y. The lfiarzrzed
Cioumé-.1′ camfilfly ‘ ‘ ‘ the

bills fmi:§3*.f&u51fi§t§éd thai the amunt contmm’ cl

¥iif%i1s:,.{;>a;:r.;;as /- Tmmfnm, it is §u.st and

Rs.54,500[- towards ‘medical

it is awaresed as against Rs.3o,wo,r~

V “Qby the Triblmal

” ~. The claimant was treatad as inpatient far 3.

* -»périod ofa?’ dqs an 3 difihrfint amcemisrm in St. Jchns

%,

Hcaspitai, Bangs:-a. fienaéderizg the fiuraticvn ckf
treatmmztg Rs.1€},{)€)£3j’~– awardnd by tin: Tribunal

tewards ‘incidental expenaw’ such as

I1G’L1I’i5hI113I}’£ and attendant chamea is ex),
side and it is dwarved ts be _c;;1§.anc£’fi’ ” =
Rs.5,fJGG/- and I award R.s..15,§300§’-

16. The claimant to V

busirzem and also sum af

%.l0,00£)/– per —$-hme is not

establishadfi; documents; In the

abaenzfezé cit it £3 just and proper to

per mtmth as against

by the Tribuxxalfi ‘I’he xzxafmre sf

that he must have been under mat

fer a. peried <32' 4 mcnths and therafam

mg: m.14,aow- is awarcicd ta-Wards 'lanes. of
ificcfia during laid up period' as agairxst Ra.9,m3Q,'-

" -~ax:vm'dcd by tine: Tribmxgl.

%

1 1. Corgsiderixxg the disability statcé. by the

cl-zyctsr and an mean: of discomfcm; and mflmppifiwss

the claimant haw to nndergo in hia futum life,

and pmpaer to award a sum of

'law of amenities' and it

m1e,ooe/- awarded by me

12. The ciaimaglt is at the
time sf acmidcnt, ~ 8:{}pfiCab1€ to his

age gmup is 1?;;’i~Iis at Rs.3,50~o/-

p.m. the clax’maz1t hag
stated _ cf 45% is the heft Icswer

limb Vapd Q ‘v1:1ies_: mwar limb. The disability

b<)dy ia 133"' Qf the

151%, which games is 21.6%

: Tm fimeizbnal disability can be taken

ag 'Therefare, tfrw 'has of futura inmme' vmrks

* L &m;»:g~; Rs..1,-1-2,800I–~ (3500 x 20/we x :2 x 17; and

] f itfis awarded as agajmt RB.Qfl,DGQ;'- awmdccl by mg

A ' Tribznmi.

8

13. Thus} this claimant is cntitlad far the

followizzg compensaticnz’

a; Pain and aufiefings – Ra.4~5,8DS

13) Bkdical expexmcs – Rs.54,509,_
c} incidental exmmcs «- R~s.15,&o£:Pg”,
cl] Loss ofinacme during ‘

Laid up pericaci — H

:3) Laws af amezfitias — 1?is.2(§,~,(J.§*fi’}€) ‘

f) Loascffuturc iwme Rs..142,aQV;3..j’;

mnu.

14′ Acwrdingly. the

The mum.’ by the Tribune} is
mcdifiéd “to A t’IV1:«’& ‘.”:’ awed herein above. The

claimant x{333fi§f,1#§€3, f§’;I’ 5:. mm: czcmpensation of

m.1,s5,oao}- awarded by

33 interest at 6% pa. an the enhaxmed

: {sf 8:. 1516,3001-» fiom. thug dam 0f:::1a1m’

tha dam of mm ” timn.

“$15. The Inauranm Company is dire.-ctcd to

VT ” the enhanced cozwmsaficn amount. tqether

with intemst within {We mcntha from the caf

receipt asf a cepy of this judmant,

15. Gut sf the enhmeti ‘

the ammmt. with pmpartimmtci-§1ta~m$t,4’« V’

be invested in fixed deposit in .

any Naxicmaiisecl Baxzkfscheééuled % k

fer a pscriowd sf 9 1:0 aim in

3 years and to periodically.

R’mai”m’ ‘5 .,;i»?i*£1_1%’P%’j.%’°® ‘1’fti:~xi;ate inteawt is
csrdared ef tlw C
rm” mm ‘aiief h

1 3% to

55/1
111599