Sri Gurulingamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 April, 2008

IN -ms mas cam on:  

DATED THIS arm 10"' my 63 }m3i2xL,"V_--v_gGea " "

was HOWBLB  

um:-r pmrrxon .i5'6§L--65' 2.¢efa;¢:~:~sLm)

BETWEEIG:
mm  35  «  
R/£13"  iizzotisas No"."'-2:5

ICA; K'O 3:5":-5' 

 K v K ms-r
 mmmm'«4r:--aR:--65
 L   ' .. murm-Icmm

     c ULI.AL,.ADV.)

1"-._'.'I'm 'star: or zcmzstau-Alas
 BY -1-an cmsr ssmn-rm?
n T  or KARNATAKA
'L'-4. «1

"E2 was oomassrcmm
' IKARNATMCA sum cmanaucs mam
 «65
. . . Rnspomanmrs

(By S:::i:B.VERAPPA, 3813?; F'% R1;
SR1. A  APPA FOR R2 )

-raxs w.1>. zs Fmm mam Am-xcms 226 02%
THE oozzss-.t.=n-u-rxoza or 1mm, manna '.ro:nImctz-g



rm R2 To mum Aumtm I1z<:$I:13'z 
TO trim P'E'1'I'1'IO):1ER.     _ -  "  
This Petition mmng'  on  :51:  Q?' %%
heaxirag this day,   
follmtingt  . " A 9

Heard. the:    

the mmaei    

   petitioner that
a  submitted by me
   Cleaxanoe Boazcd seeking-
  under the scham, "vame
  pejcmt  petitioner to pay a. sum :5:
- by means of a demnddrfit.
3 3   According to the petitiolzer, for
 consideration the case of 
 petitioner is not oonsidered and am
endomot has been issued as pet 
dt.15.11.200'7. Challenging the same, 

(O 3
pzresmxb petition is filed. % to direct 

'3-1/



2"" respondent to cscnsider the    

dt.1.1.20OB as per marmwcure–EV.

4. The learned counsel

Slum cloaxanoo Board
objection in regard to or
the writ Petitio::*4L..–L vim:
(Inprovement $973. 1:: the
petitioner order passed by
the 2″‘ he has

tc§..~fj_,1e the G 1:. wiizhin

‘1’he:ca£o:r:¢-., ha

Goixz;tv%’t§’§ii*g§:i§:iss the petition.

A3: stage, the loa.-.-rm: munael far

submits that the petitioner may

to withdraw the Writ petition

to file an appeal befora the:

within 15 days from taday

z.-aquests the Court to direct the Government

consider the appeal. if any, filed by

W

5

7. with the above absenration, the writ

Petition is dimissecl and if an appeal is
filed, the Interim came: that may be
the petitioner shall he ”

Government .