'3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 2573 DAY OF' NOVEMBER 2008
BEFORE
THE HOITBLE MR.JU8TICE 3.8. PATIL
wan' PETITIOIV No.15925 or 2007 {GM-qg;-é§:;:'V':' ~
BETWEEN:
Sri I-i.R.Jayappa,
S/0 late Rudrappa,
Aged about 63 years,
Agricultuxist,
R/at Kalgcm Village,
Bharamasagar Hobli, _ "
Chitradurga Taluk 65 Distziqt. _ " F1?'.Tl"I'IONER
(By Sn RS. Ravi, Adv.)
Maliammfi, * ' V V -~ V
W] 0 Veerabhadrappa,' 2
Aged about 4'? . '
Agxicultugtist,
Ii'/at Kcflgere Village,» .
Bhazamasagarafiobli, """ "
'~Chit:I~ad_urgaVTa1}ik District. RESPOHDENT
(B5,? Adv.)
Pefition is filed under Articles 226 65 227 of the
W ' ' 4Cc; n:3titufioii of India praying to quash the order dated
V' «__1'3§G9.2i3f)7 made on I.A.Nos.8 85 9 in O.S.No.1'63/ 2005 on the
fi1e._of" ii Additional Civil Judge (Jr.D11.), Chitradurga, Vida
_ A;':1ne}x11re--E.
This Pefifion coming on for pmliminary hearing this day,
"The Court made the following-
....3.....
wife of Veerabhadrappa was maria under a bonafide
The said suit has reached finality as the plain: was *
10.03.2000
. Even. in the present sui_t,…..pe’titior1er”‘
written statement as back as on 04.01.200fj Wi1erein’~oisouif
asserted that the plaintifi”-Smt.Ma1]:s:fimza wos ‘fixer setfork§:v*.szife«V’3of VA
late Veerabhadrappa. That ‘being tVH_€::V.§AApe:f§tior1er
cannot be now permitted to ” i~;:€$1;iAr.’1 2:(b1ruission made
and assert something.oont1~z3v:’3*w–‘ro::’fh’eV Court below
was right and sought for in
this regard.
04. Insofafas tl1’e seeldng to raise a
ground conteudringé thaf ._Be1′;éir1z1:fr’L”{‘ra11sao1ions (Prohibifion) Act,
1988 is 33:: reirospeo’£;i:*e,___bfo;t is prospective is concerned, it is
not to izroorpomte such an assertion. in the pleadings
as it qoesrioo of law that can be urged at any time by
‘l the ;Jetitioi:;er”‘*V’oVc:f(>’i;e the Court.
; In’TviueWV”of the above, there being no merit in this Writ
” _pc:§iI:*.io133, trio same is dismissed.
34/?
Iudgg’
V ‘Ems