High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri H R Ranganagouda vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 December, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri H R Ranganagouda vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 December, 2008
Author: N.K.Patil
nn.r- y_s'.<\:avw.rn- so! Iv-Ir\nVIl-Ilrli\l- I'II\.'s"'T \--\JI.JN' VJ!' RIQKIYHIHRR 715971 LKJUKI U!'      

m 'ram HIGH comm' as ream:-m'r.am AT nnnaapfifis.

ma-ran: 'I"'H'3I$ mm: 03''' new or nscmBEa...'2_o§:§_6-;'.;~ 

: BEFORE 2

THE HuN'a;E nR.Jvswi¢g~H.x.PniiL. 9?x

WRIT FETIITION KG-1§53fi'._Q:?. x2008.'

BETVEEISI 2

1.

. 33:: ‘i*!’.P..EF:£’3£§IifiP:;E~’t:3i3flF’tg ”

Sm msmmuum, ._ V

Assn AH€3uf£’_ 33 ~gg.n._,.-j, ‘ A _ ._
vuvmxn sagsan E&Ifi,FR1:EI3Hn9;
Amzwrmx 1;§I~L1;..9.;;::a,’;_ _ ”
mum:-;”a ” 9I:3.=2′–‘::; BELLRRY: _ ‘

.593:

‘S;-ft: ‘

A32.-‘£313 ABOUT
FAIR 31%: :3? stamp,’
ysaunxncasjzrx m_.A’s’x,

; Tmux .5; “‘.=*2;_»:_Vs*r: Ecsuunnv.

‘ , Si.~2.I . :t:V.’i;2§vI«’Sz_nmrPA,

am’ }€.;”3é?;TT£§fi.ahP?A,

* 35.323 A’£*:a;:TA'[:: 59 YEARS,

Ff§.__IR _=..=vm_r:;i.3 3130?,
Y. fizznzmn mama,

TA£;£35€V__ci nzsr: BELLARY.

V. ékij. H.mL;..n.I.n.H,
ESECI H.$$!P.PP}i,
AGEB A3061′ 58 YEARS,

FAIR PRICE 330?,
SIRIIVAR VILERGE,
KRFPASPLL E-‘DST,

TALUK £ DIET: BELIJKRX’.

v» — — -r—nu-1 – nun I In-\Ju’l\I Ell’ EMKIVAIAKA HIGH

II
ha

5. 3R1.Ta:MMnrPA,
sis AEJAEAPPA,
Efiflfl ABUUT 55 vnhns,
$313 FRIES SHOP,
xunuwazwz u1L&Asx,
raaux a 915?: Bsnuanv.

6. sRI.J.fi0BBABASAPPh,

sin ssvnmnnnraa, ,’_
353$ ABOUT 65 YEAR3,. V,
FAIR ynzcs 333?, *,’
xv3uT3zmz vznuasz, _m_A_
TA&UK a DIST: 3EfihhEY._’m

3. $£1.M.PREHKflAE;”» =
Sffi H.CHE§AfiANflfi3PA¢
BEBE A£¢ut>§5.23nns,
ERIK Pfi3CE*SHfi?; g <_ _
sAn5AahKa§.vIaLa£E;.'"' ;
maLuxA&.nI$¢: EEnLART:»w'

9. 8RE.S¢K.HAHflMAPRA}w”
3fa’3,K,HAHumANTHa?RA,
Assn Amour 52’¥EARs.

_;FA:a Pkiflfi snag,

-_’5£flEAfiAKAL vzannsz,

‘ _» maasx K DIST: ssnnnav.

‘~.a; $2:;3gnfiafinEuar2A,
‘. ~3zu a;3a5An&a,

y_A§EE_EBQUT 42 YEARS,
33:3 PRICE sump,
xaykaaaa viaunsz,

‘x:,flTxLuK a 325?: ngzuanr.

‘.i¢;hMsAxma,

Bffi GREEEMMA,
A533 ABGUT fifi VEARS,

3313 ?R1CE SflG?,

KRPEAGKL Vlfihhfig,

TA$flK & DIST: EEbLAfiY.

… PETITEONER3

(BY SRI.M.R.FATIL, ADVOCATE)

_ .__.. __.,… .. …………….. ruur! Luau! or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH}.-l

I!
ah

paaseczi by the third rasparxciant Vida mméflgrawh
in reapect of the petitioners

vi}. lagers and tax quash

mart: ificatiena dad: ed 03 . lfié :, ikidg’ ‘*

3 arm 3.1 to B.6_ i33″i;1.3.B €$-

rasporzfiant and to :5
call for the new:’fgizfV’fi’:fi$§§V.’V»’»§ah9paQwfifger making
the arzquiry and Claims 11(2)
of the 1992, have

13 re sanféd ‘ Iiatitian.

‘I ‘i’~.a’¥:G learned Cozmael rm:

the §ev’:’:_’1..t:1°’zVV}V.”5t’:g”n = 4

Qffiv».*’-..*–9~’ has raxmad the ahjecticm

‘: .f$:3Aar<§if!3§::'ififaintainability of the petition cm

that, thia matter comes within the

ju:r':E.$ref{.é.£:1::3.4:n of High Ccxurt of Karnataka,

" iCi~.:c:;§1t Bench at Dharwad.

4.. 0:2. careful pemaal cf the material on

record, the mffics ohjaaticm is upheld.

ur mxmmxn r-new COURI or xnmnrmm men coma: or

RNATIKA HIGH

_ – “run: 1r”I!FII\l’I l1I\}l”‘l \, \JI,)lC V

foxthéith.

U3

5. Hence, the instant Wait Petition stands

diapmsed ef xesexving libe::t:y;~ – .’ f this

gatiti-amrs to file a fresh

before the High Cuurt L

Beach at Dnarwad. T A

All the groundfi $2?

are laft even.

It the tor the
pnatlticrzat-.’-_z’:3 return «of the
cse»xt1f; af€1:”‘ __ notificutiems,

C3ffi.€1?2- :Q;iI2’*31¢t¢<a%. ""*$*i.$§ return the same

Sd/–i
Tuchge

"» *K3mrm3.12.2oea.