Sri.J.Jeevarathinam vs Smt.Manikyam on 24 November, 2009

, f j.';z'___§_7s;_.&=;ci1»3".T.:_nEr<i?i*s :

:1: ms BIG!-I mum or KARNATAKA AT 3mm.L§Rfl§_  " 

DATED 'fit-I18 mm 24th my or uqmmnm   '  

nnronn
THE HOIPBLE MR. Jus*ric:,:E'*v«.su3Q3;m__1 3, 1§:I)'I':.._ "'  

Mxscmnmxggus m_;n_§°'r~ ..  6? 

APPELLANT:   '

SR3. J. J&:EvARA'§'§¥1i'%s;Ai~A-  'i i   
5+/0. LATE J5T.";::'V:i;:2c)'5's"§'*<V.":-%,'--:;- " 'A

31'-'D MVVAIN:i€0A}§;:"-. * 
MAHALA;;SHMiPUiéA.m§'LA&'<3uT
J.c.V1\:AGAj'<cw  X 

av"

   First Appeal filed U/(3 41 Rule mi of

 Lcpc against $;AlitA0zt1cr dated: 103.2007 passed in WCA/ FISRINQ.

'4  "aim the file of the Labour Ofliccr and Commissionar for

 _W'o:"k:zr:én's Clonapcnsation, Hassan, awarding a compensation of

  E3,68,34{}/~ with interest @ 1?/6 p.a.

This Miscellanwus First Aypcal coming for orders; this day,

"""I

the Court made the following :  '
copy"!

if
1; 53/

".3

Aaaistanr Regxysm
3 A54:    
 !,E;..m'r::. 353 99;,



M£AHQ%%mflfl2

ORDER

One Wc:ck’s time: is gxantaci !§a’J””compIjg _tV}V.f.c:–‘.fa:>fl”Z{:cV ‘ j

objbcficns, failing which, the appeal

JWWE