Karnataka High Court
Sri.J.Jeevarathinam vs Smt.Manikyam on 24 November, 2009
, f j.';z'___§_7s;_.&=;ci1»3".T.:_nEr<i?i*s : :1: ms BIG!-I mum or KARNATAKA AT 3mm.L§Rfl§_ " DATED 'fit-I18 mm 24th my or uqmmnm ' nnronn THE HOIPBLE MR. Jus*ric:,:E'*v«.su3Q3;m__1 3, 1§:I)'I':.._ "' Mxscmnmxggus m_;n_§°'r~ .. 6? APPELLANT: ' SR3. J. J&:EvARA'§'§¥1i'%s;Ai~A- 'i i 5+/0. LATE J5T.";::'V:i;:2c)'5's"§'*<V.":-%,'--:;- " 'A 31'-'D MVVAIN:i€0A}§;:"-. * MAHALA;;SHMiPUiéA.m§'LA&'<3uT J.c.V1\:AGAj'<cw X av" First Appeal filed U/(3 41 Rule mi of Lcpc against $;AlitA0zt1cr dated: 103.2007 passed in WCA/ FISRINQ. '4 "aim the file of the Labour Ofliccr and Commissionar for _W'o:"k:zr:én's Clonapcnsation, Hassan, awarding a compensation of E3,68,34{}/~ with interest @ 1?/6 p.a. This Miscellanwus First Aypcal coming for orders; this day, """I the Court made the following : ' copy"! if 1; 53/ ".3 Aaaistanr Regxysm 3 A54: !,E;..m'r::. 353 99;, M£AHQ%%mflfl2 ORDER
One Wc:ck’s time: is gxantaci !§a’J””compIjg _tV}V.f.c:–‘.fa:>fl”Z{:cV ‘ j
objbcficns, failing which, the appeal
JWWE