High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Jagadeesha vs Sri Manjuantha on 8 August, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri Jagadeesha vs Sri Manjuantha on 8 August, 2008
Author: N.K.Patil


-HI’-vlr wvultu \.II I\r’|l\l’ll”IlP’Il\.l”1 rlI\’Il’l \n\J§J!\I vr l\I”|I\E’l’\l!’\l\F\ l”IE\3l”! \.¢\J\JKl Ln” I’\I”\H¥’I’\lf\I\I’\ f1l’.3’rf Nu’-“JR

3% Tfifi Hzaaaxmam Q? K&fi§fl%Kfi¢ EAfiEAQK$, ,

§fiTE§ TEES €55 e”‘:ma cw E3333? 2e§8f””5§ff=-‘

EEZEEERE

wag HQE*E&E ma, 5§5T:cEV:§.§;?ATr$« ”

max? ygfixrzaw Ms.3?%$§2QQ8’z§§as§§”‘

BE’E”3i¥%€

an: JAGAEEESHA T’ T_;,
3£Q,LAT§.EKgaAm&zg§;,VT
gegm RBQfiT 3% 3E%R5;*;.4.Vx -‘;
%fifi:A§RZ€fiL§§I§T,€ ” *_ =*»m»
R:§.3ALz§ug%fiILi&$§;, ” *
K&3%BA HE§L;, ‘ 1fQjt*wi 3
$ERAw$%£fi%§’vflXER fiE5TREflE;

: *:a 1 .*a 11… ygyzwzamaa

ifiy 5:15’§*§ Bfigsfiafifigéag £393

3953

xi fiaiEfi&N3uNATH§ ______ H
£§§*SRE;§R§fifiRfi,
‘A£E3fA3%§? é2 EEAEQ,
‘-£7m:a£3:zEL?$Rz3§;

fi£fl.¥£LE¥fiR Qifiéfififi,

Eggggg H§ELE,SER% ?%LUK,

‘*»n:¥yE?.2:sTE£c$.

A ma” «

*5E$ €EE§fiAPER
‘;Q:3.221 HfiHHM%§T§%E&E,
.f%5§3 Assmw 52 23533;

%;?§$s$ :.é’3:%’.:3r§.E€¥I.;’I’T,3″RE ST;

330. ‘%?ELE.%E,
}=f33.$§;E3a E-§E’..’%EsLI.}. SEER ‘ZKLEEK,
‘2’.”%’fi*§.E’?7.’=Z.f¥I.?’~*i. 3.’.%ISTFi.Z{3’§’ .

SR1 E€E’§;’1’E-EAFFA

” “” “‘ “””‘ “‘ ‘” “”” “”‘–“‘ “””-‘”-y__”.-‘V- I’-‘|I\-rl-ruu-1 ‘lI\-II! \a\J\lI\I vi I\J’\l’\l’l’Ill’II\l’\ run-all \u-\IIuII\l ‘VI l\l’u\I’l’I-I-I’\I\l’I III!-‘HI ‘H.-\IIunI ‘hull I\l”ll’\l’l”lll’\l\l’I llI\III \-\II.ano

witnafisgfi anfi has takgn ints waaaifigxaticn thg
azai aaé fiaaamentary avideaca. Tber2f0;e{¢§fiéE%
fiflfitf %aiaw apinafi that thfi §$titiQn§$ %aS fi§%’
mafia fifit any case tg flaw§E{§§§’5§::$fi%%gfl§f T

fixama §ana&gyat. E fig mg: fiififiVany éziar at?

itzggaiarity camittad by fifié trig: wfiufit énd
thfi imfiazfaranca by t&ia7§®fii§ fleas fiat mall
ffiz. Eaa$z§imgly; thig pétitififi is éismissad

an fievflifi of fl€K£fiS:{

Sd/-

Judge