1
iNTTE§HKH§COURTCH?KARNATAKA
{HRCUHW%§KXiKTDHARWfiD
DATED THES THE 30TH DAY OF' JUNE. 2009
BEFGRE
THE HQIVBLE MR: JUSTICE AS}-EOK B, HINcr3:_§3E:Ri: " H
WRIT PETITION NO. 69.453! %2m91GM+c1=,> r;:§-‘iv ”
BETWEEN:
sR1.JA1N_UsAB _
SIG MBDULSAB VALLESABNAVAR _ *_
AGE 32 YEARS, 2 5 ‘
mo DAMBAL
MUNDARAGITALUK V , ‘V
DI’S’!’RiC’I’:GADAG. I *’…PE’1*1’r10NER
{By NUS .5, 3. Sam???
1, MQHAMMAD Ram» « %
S/O Hussy.-..IN:sAB~wI}LLE:;*§A}JAR
AGED A8001′ 2-wvgzskg,
R/O QAMBA1, V A 1 ‘ ‘
TALW: MUHDARAGI
” * _!)IE§T§2If;T:DHARWFx?;}–« –
2. ‘s:sM;”V.V TFATUB! A’ V
*-wig HUS3–§$Ai’NSAB WHLLENAVAR
A<f:.E": 59 Yagmg,
R] :1 czm 'Y, R TADAPATRI
BEHINDBUS grams
1* ' " — V' z,AxME$iiIwAR
DISTRICT: HAVERI
3. IMAMSAB
S/C} NASURSAB WULLENAVAR
AGE: 50 YEARS,
R/O DAMBAL
TALUK: MU1’€DARAGI H
DISTRICT: GADAG. .. .’-RESPQNDENFS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS 1?f11,ES=’u’N:;Sr;r5RT1C1;ESA”226 AND
22? OF THE coNS’rrrU’rIc)N GF’ I_NDIA;_ zéz22=J:’:1s:r:;_’TQ; ISSUE WRIT
or» CERTIORARI GR mar STHES SRDER DATED
1012/20439, PASSED BY CIV}:£;”J’é_lC1GE.A(;i§R.D’N} ‘mm mm GADAG
EN 0.S.N0.27/2096 §fi;’fi«Iif-?XURE:A};’: V.
THIS Pli1’I’!’I’*:I4f;V3)I*é;T-4″rZ’,C1V’l’§»:’fEN(§’§i,}§f’ mR”‘;PrzSLIMINARY HE.AR¥N(}
THIS DAY, THS%1SS:.§S*:-S4_ga_:;S’*mS “FQI{;;(§WING:
%
pffiiitiiiiiiéfiif 1’f{3.£1f3 §_;A;” SQ? his impéeadment in CLSK
Ng:i;’2?,/C!£$;_j v..gppf_ii:ai;SiS:: w.aS rejected by 1:213 Trial Court:
holrjizfig’ “%’p;c}f.§j:iS:1er is not S pmper and 1’2€:C!3S&fl1}f
“the issuers izivelved in the Suit. AS is
SS ‘I’ri,a1 C»::3L11’t’S order both me plajnfifis and the
‘V thiS applicatiena The: Trial Cautrt has
concem that naturrir 4:31’ the claim or right of the
;§e*:§§:§9fler is £193.: dfimlcssed in the affzdavit filed in suppon of
the Sppiicatigzz fer implcadt My perusal Of the Sflidavit
4. This gmtition is dismissed but reserving
liberty and sub_§<=::r.:t. to the Qbservatjens magic = -ii: » '
sac*