IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 14'?" DAY OF DECEMBER A' BEF ORE THE I-ION"BLE MR.JUSTICE.N.ANAN']f)A "T A CRIMINAL PETITION 1V*o.§%;o74/2oi_g,j. «T " E D BETWEEN: V 4' E V V Sri M.Jayave1u S/o.1\/Ianikkam Aged about 53 years . R/at No.324, Appu Bui}dir;g V '-- 7 2nd 'A' main,:.76--A of IPC. -2- This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following: ORDER
The petitioner is arrayed as accused
No.46?’ / 2010 registered for an offence .
Section 366~A IPC by Rajagopafilanaagagr
maternal uncle of first accused, is “to; have’
kidnapped one Ishwarya, a ”
2. Heard iearnéa ‘(3.ou11selc;’:l petitioner and
learned Goverrr1nent,.”P1eader State and I have
beenitalterr ijrnfestigation records.
elr-t theyfi.rst_fl’inforrnation lodged by the father of
victirn, it._:sus.pec’ted’:that first accused had induced
. andtal:en..pawayVH’the minor Victim to marry her. The
invuepstigat’ion–records do not reveal that this petitioner
pyresent when the victim was induced by the first
.accused. The Investigating Officer had suspected
liiriveolvernent of petitioner, as he happens to be the
V’ “rnaternal uncle of first accused. Q
59, , ,¥{;/Mot. K J
4. This Court ha}: granted bail in
Cr1.P.N o. 5243 / 20 I O to accused No.3, again_s”t–:
simiiar allegations are made. Therefore,.f}5etitiVoher.’Vfish’v
released on bail on the ground of”parity{_: » ‘
5. in the result, I pass trle foiioiifing
Petition is accepted. on bail,
subject to following ”
1) Petitioner for a sum of
for the likesurn
V’ __ ::,tf1%Is§sr1ictiona1 Court.
” intimidate or tamper with
‘A
.. Petitt’oner___s_h,a}l regularly attend the Court.
Sd/-
JUDGE