Between:
1.
IN THE HIGH CQURT OI? KARNATAKA AT BA?{-Gg=§L__(}f£§"
Dated: 21st day of 3 T
Presefgt f} . '
Harms Mr.JUsT1c:E Vff,}CJ-PALA C+t>WDA7L&;L&~if[A
An-d..__""" '-
Hoxrble M§.JUS'I'I_CE.j%.i$.BCPAI§NAf%
wan' p.E2:nmN.§Jos.139a0-3:92:29; 0 lemmas;
Sri.K.A.Salcx-':m,4 ~
3/o.I~:.Am.z;;ua,;¢ ¢
Aged abeL1t_A32%_jzet»:s1fs,
Residiiatg at Kallahaiili .4
Vi3lage,1vv--Mafi1asag%g:'Post, ~ ' '
Sakaleslijgura 'I'a1_211<.;- '4 " -._ " ' « '"
Hassan District. . '
__S:i.V_Vi:K.:S21i§Iegdixnia_,_M .
'S/Vofiéafigow da,
' Aged yearzs,
~Residi1:g;%a: Cegjnibcedu
Vilfiige .'§L1'1cifp(:vé','£,
15/iuéEige:_%é:"?€a1uk,
'V.,(3hikk.:uv:nagaiur Dist.
; .' l§;ri. D'harma Shetty,
_ :'$jG.Babu Shetty,
Aged about 49 years,
'"£'Eesi:;iiI"ig at: S.P.R0a
Department oi_"'Mig1es =:Geel'<";gy,-..'* V.
Kanija Div'i;=;io12,_ " I --. .
Banga1ere«.~1. . " b
4. Deputy Cd'mfif1iSSiQI1€I'," _
Hassa:1,Distfiej:,
Hasssagl. " _ A
'i'111e'» _é;s:3is 2.-r11*:1t" 'Commissioner,
A Sakgiesiipvra Sub-Division,
sakaiesnpgea;
Haswn _¥;';)ist:5ict.
:'i'11eLTa"h5§ldasr,
_ '.3361-u'r.Ta1uk,
_' 55;-3i'L1r',' Hassazz Qistxici. ..RES§'ONQE2N"I'S
(By Sri.R.G.K0i1e, may
000~
These W.Ps are filed under Article 226 & 227 of the
Constitution of India praying to quash the erd-ere at
Annexuzes-L, M 85 N dated :9-12-2009 and to dVii°ee£._ the
respondents to extend the period of lease of petitioners; V'
These W.Ps eoming on for 911. hearing
this day, Gopaia Gowda, J passed thVeA>f0ii0w_’ir1’g:+_: p
oknengfd
These common petitions: fzied’ by *
being aggrieved by the i1:np11g1ed_._d§I”€:1$5i*$_» lease
hoid rights prematurely,
2. The gfie*J;.a11ce””ef’ is that the 3rd
respondezit without considering
the expianetien them te the Show cause notice
and therefore Vie.v’vie’1tatien ef principles of natural justice.
ledmed éeeiirzeel hae urged that the impugxed
e:rdere_e~ fie be quashed by ailowing these writ:
d%dtdt:>ee:ms. “‘ d
W e Koile, learned Additional Government Advee.-ate
of the reependerzte submitted that against the
erders the petifieners have get an aiternate remedy
V’ “bf revisierx under Rule 53 amka Mirler Mineral
–p1jen1a’u5;re. ”
Concessian Rules, 1994 and {hay may be directed to avail
the said remedy.
4. The submission of learned
Advocate is no longer res-intega in Vi€W of -thé:~..cie:§;isiAo:1_: “of »
Supreme Court in the case of ‘
REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARK£§’_z’epor1V§éd.’i11 A11«{%19%99kkst3 22. f ;
5. Armexures-A, B _8s C legagséhdfieiadis Vgfiiiecuted in
favour of petitioners. 6»2»2009
and 20–1~2009 re§sp’eg:t§v<;1j;'I' –'i'f}:fs.¢" is one year.
All the i1np:.1gm;:d__V are dated 19-32-
2009» 'I;h;1s," Ease of first p€tifi{}I1(-3:3, the
cancellaticzn bf _V1<~::a$.V£:::=m;'.'4ViVJ*'.1v " of other two petitioners are
' ":'%3.f1,.rf;15i=':}:_'_L1res–E3, F & G are the Show causes issued
to élieging that they have ca:m'cd~«<)1f1 mizinizxg 01'
bf; machinaries. Azmexureswfi, J & K arc the
_ré:{p1i;¢i$'"'-giateaci 14-IE2-2009 submitted by mg petifiancrs. A
of impugxeé orders revgal that the explanations
éubmitted by the petitionem to the Show cause notices were
Ev
JUDGE
not at all considered. Therefore, the impugxed ord-:~::_'rS :'_t::§1'r2;f1ot
be sustained in iaw.
7. The writ petitioils are allowed ‘ ; n
orders are quashed. The 8rd
consider the explanation of tht’3.,e [‘)~;”:fCit§.£)V.1’1x’3I’SV,–“‘f.uIV1’f’3I3I} anti
thereafter pass appropriate ordei’s;”‘3,ecorfia:iaIiceV:vVith law.
The loss of lease mriod oii aceoum T’ i_mpugned orders
shali be extendeg’$N:.;§_o tifiati ‘eXteI£tv, _j_’~i£ explanation is
accepted by trio ‘
Sd/–
JUDGE
Sd/e