IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.
DATED THIS THE 20% DAY OF OCTOBER _
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE 'R£.1f)Bt
WRIT PETITION NO. 7242'Oi%§ 200915-R)
BETWEEN
K R KULKARNI V --
s/O. LATE RAMARAO KU_LKAI'.iNL-- . 'A " ,
AGE 72 YEARS, PRESENTLY 'RESIBIN ..AT _
C/O. SSKULKARNI H , A .
SR1. MATHA BUILDING
JUMBO SAWAR' £>;1s1NI, BA_NDI~ERGfiATTA ROAD
BANGALORE; ~ * _ ...PETITIONER
(BY M S: »3\.!£v1§\/IURLIDHAR, ADV)
AND:
1 THE MEI-ABER SECRETARY
; 'COMMON COMMITTEE FOR
A' PRIMARY 'GO~:QPERA'I'IVE AGRICULTURE
. V AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS IN
ALUR VENKATA RAO ROAD
' BANGALORE - 18.
2A RRGIGTRAR OF CO-OPERA'I'IVE
zS"QCIETIES IN KARNATAKA
Aj{_.} ASKAR ROAD
AA BANGALORE" 1. RESPONDENTS
={BY°sR1. G R PRAKASH & s TI-IEJASWINI 3:
GOPALA KRISHNA R HEGDE, ADV FOR R1)
V’ ‘(BY SR1. T P SRINIVASAN, ADV FOR R2}
EA
if
THIS PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &_.-.227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE
THAT THE CALCULATION AND PAYMENT OF’ GRAT’EJITY”~TO.4A
THE PETITIONER AS PER ORDER DATED 29.oS.1;~S95VVV1D’E ‘
ANN–A ES CONTRARY TO THE PAYMENT OF’ GRA_fi*U1Ty*ACiI’f;”-‘«e *
1972 AND THE DECISIONS OF THIS HoN’B_.LE_ ‘C.oU_R’§ IN”
THE CASE OF SR1. N S SRINIVASA _MURf1’HY AND TjO’FHERS’-._ ‘
VS. REGISTRAR OF Co~OPERATIVE’ SOCIETIES-.__ ‘EN ~
KARNATAKA AND OTHERS, PASSED2AIN1W’:P. »4li892;-4900}5Q17?.:
DATED 17.11.2003; AND ETC. _
THIS PETITION, COMING:ON FOR.V_PRi;.H’EPiRING
IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS _DAY THE
FOLLOWING: A <
9.” 9_…§«,..__.,
The and efficacious
remedy of Rule 10 read with
SeCtion:L’4’__of ofjératuity Act and Rules
made Controlling Authority and
therefOre.,; the petitioner cannot maintain a petition for a
Petition is accordingly rejected
resehrvingi’Ifa_e:rty””to the petitioner.
Sd/-3
JUDGE