High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri K Satish S/O. Kempe Gowda vs The Commissioner Bruhat … on 8 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri K Satish S/O. Kempe Gowda vs The Commissioner Bruhat … on 8 June, 2009
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
 _ BANGALORE~560072

   SRE. KR. CHANDRAIAI-I s/0 K. RAME GOWDA

-1».

DATED THIS THE 3TH aA&f%C$:§%I.V 7
BEF03E % %    y  
THE Ham-3LE MR.JUSTI¢E i€&M REDJSY
wxerr PETITION     2ooV9V%% {LB-TAX)
BETWEEN:      'V

1 SR! K SA'fISH. S/ oi, K:3;1v{r>.r:i"'c§:c)£%rD.aa»5
NC}.55{_),~ 4rrH<j;y1A:zx:,j3T;:1 cm _'''S_ A

PAN CI~1As:~1'E.EL;:x~ NAG'j;aaf  

NAGfiRABHA'?J_{E}   ' 
AMARA J';'O'I'H'E NAGAR WARD

BANGALORE-;$60o7:;{ ._ * -
} A V S/O DCIDDAHUCHAIAH
No.544«,u..4'rHV MAIP3, &~$TH CROSS
EAN§3HASHEELA NAGAR
 ' NAGARABHAw{.E;. ~
 é "AMAFSALEYOTHI NAGAR WARD
* --» 13Am.AwRE~560o?2

2 sR1.'GAN%GADfiARA.iAH'

3 ~. ".-SEE.' fi!fNANDEESH 3/0 KEMPE GOWDA
' .__NO.8.(), 42-"H MAIN, 5TH CROSS
PAN'CHASHEELA NAGAR
 NA{}A1;'~?ABHAV"I{E)
.. , LAMARA JYOTHI NAGAR WARD

NQ542, 4TH MAIN, 5TH CROSS
PANCHASHEELA NAGAR
NAGARABPiAVI(E)

AMARA JYGTHI NAGAR WARE}

BAN GALORE660072 M



 

   _' (33y Sn' : N RAGHUPATHY, ABV)

 

-2-

Sm'. K. SWETHA W/O CHANDRA./IAH--'_'
N().540, 4'I'H MAIN, STH CROSS  j; '
PANCHASHEELA NAGAR   '
NAGARABHAVHE) , _  
AMARA JYOTHI NAGAR"WARD 
BANGALORE-560072  

SR}. KEMPE GOWDA s/or NANJ
930.159, 4TH MAIN,.5TH'--CE5£}v-SS'*--  ._ . _
PANCHASHEELA NAGAR    
NAGARABHAVI(E}  _  .. 
AMARA JYOTHI NAGAR;wAR13_j_'-. V' _ 

3ANGALciRE;a569o;f2  % V V
SR1. GOVIN_[3§E GUWDA' S/O LAEKSHMANA GOWDA
No,.5.4.1« '4f_I'H "?.2'Eg%IN; _ am CROSS
PA.NcHAS-;;--;EEL;a 'N-.A('§AR _ _-
NA:{}ARABHA§?T{E)    _
AMARA'JYOTHI._jNAGA__R'WARD

BANGALORVE-56O{)72
%$M1*;..sHAN-2mAMMA D/O Govlnns GOWDA

 »  ..'_1~m.g59,.%.4TH  5TH CROSS
" , PANCHASEIEELA NAGAR
'  "mGARAB5jAvI(E)
-.AMA~RA..,,rYQ*rH1 NAGAR' WARD

'A BANGALQRE-560072

Sm. KEMPE GOWDA s/0 NANJUNDAIAH
No. 1'57, 4TH MAJN, STH czzoss

.. A 'lE'ANCHASHEELA NAGAR

'  " NAGARABHAVI(E)
 AMARA JYOTHI NAGAR WARD
 BANGALCJRE-560072

 PETITIONERS



 

 

J-

AND :

1 THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT ,
BANGALORE MAHANAGARA m1,;u_<;
N.R.SQUARE, BANGAL{)R4E~56GOD:2

2 THE BEPUTY coMMIssfor§E;2(RE$?E-NQiEj ;
BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE

BANGALORE-2

3 THE REVENUE OFFECER» B.B.M.P.  
GOVINDARAJA Nfi}GAR..RANGE._'"' .. 
WARD NE). 33;   3,

    '

BANGAL0RE+53" %   A. é 
V . . ' .  '  '":Ii::,.  " ..  
THESE. WRITVV. "FILED UNDER ARTICLES

A"v¥?E'I':fi'EQN--ERS"'RESPECTIVE PROPERTIES AS ABOVE AND

TQ 'V THE.-v"PROPER'I'Y 'TAX ENCLOSED TO THE
FORM 'NO.3'  WAY OF' CHEQUE.

'TfHEE§.E " KWRIT PETITIONS COMING on FOR

.1_A'_j.,.«.4PRL.HEAR£§¥G THIS DAY, THE ccxum' MADE THE
_  V A P'QLLGWING:



-5-

upon the respondent to perform, aC()OIl;1'I¥3§i1"iif3§i:e_

refusal 1:0 do so; ((:)A the lack of any “‘ ‘V

remedy; and (cl) i11appro;):*iate1y:=,j11v{;:i§ed ‘eff

the court.

3. In the __in ceseute are
that the petitionem éifierest in the
immovable patras’
issued by well as by the
Tahsfldee, -‘Taluk. Hakim patras

cannot: efiuated nnent of transfer of title

to i1n1;{1dv’ableV apparently not being compliant

of Promrty Act. The right, if any, on

5i_§.va Patna needs to be established in

law. Kn fie” éibsenee of relevant material constituting

W legal evidence of the acquisitien of land,

forifiefien of a layout in a maxmer known to law, and

T ffIri’e”aHotment of sites by an authority ix} law, it is not

gevossibie to accept the petitioners’ plea that they possess

M

.3}.

of sites; for the weaker sections of szacietyg was L” the _
subject matter, this court is helpleee’ as it is eo1n;3;on}y”‘.

observed that Hakim Patras _ are

publicity than as an actual ‘motive fof’
siteiess people, confeméog flé’1éeV”ree ipients.
Keeping in mind the material to
estabiish they right in the
immovable as a consequence,
a legal the petitioners are
not enflelee Even otherwise the

petitionexs Iiave not with the requirement of

“4”A’ Of Municipal Coworation

‘A.etV§,__e?. notice of both the transferor and

tra1is1Eeree~ to_fl’ie respondent to make out a katha,

. , a.Y°* H”

‘I’he,.¥1et1ti01;31s wlthout merit and H, aecnmsnntn

Sd/-91
Iudgé