1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED TI-I15 THE 9*" BAY OF JUNE 2009 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: I-ION'BLE MRJUSTICE s.N.sATYAMARA\r'A'NA-:1 1. SRLPRASAD SUBBANNA, MEME,.ER_,x I Misceiianeous First Aggeal [E006 A Lok Adalat No;£g7 g2a9;_9_ * BETWEEN: I SR1. K.SREENI\/ASA RAO, S/O.£.ATE ANANTHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC: PROPRIETOR, HOTEL NAGASHREE, OPPOSITE SREE SIDDARTHA' ff" MEDICAL COLLEGE, AGA%LAKo,T£,..j A. *~ .. __ TUMKUR TALUK ANDD_ISTRICT._ " , .. APPELLANT , "(By sat.' v_.E.sIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: I ~ 1 S'RI."I3_.c;OHO=-J:-:.Ev_, E}O;'éATE SASHA SAB, AGE; 57 YEAR§_;;R/AT BIBI JAN COMPOUND, G.C.R.._COLOIIY,firuMKuR. ~ "THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD., . .TUMKi__JR SHOPPING COMPLEX, * _ '~._B..|-7l.RO'AD, TUMKUR ~ 572 101. ' _ REPRESENTED BY TIS BRANCH MANAGER. .. RESPONDENTS
(BY SR1. A.N.KRISHNA SWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
‘TMFA FILED u/5.173(1) OF MV A-CT AGAINST THE EUDGMENT AND AWARD
‘DATED 12~–o1-2oo5 PASSED IN MVC 940.735/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE PRLCIVIL
JUDGE (SR.DN.) & ADDLMACT, TUMKUR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION
FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION EEFORE LOK A{)Ai.AT AFYER
BEIflG REFERRED VIBE ORBER DATES 24-3-2689, THE FOLLOWIMG____(}RBER 323
PASSES.
The learned counsel for the appeiient and cczzuesweit-.__
for respondent —Insurance Company al<f:;~Jng::fr;9st'Itvh"'r.th'1e;A'reb–:teeen.tei:ive..__if
are present.
2. After due deliberations,_the ‘iee,_$etti5e’ci;-. appeiiant
has agreed to receive and Company
has agreed to pay as giehai VV;f>’i’V:’V§i”3ts’.25,00£)i~ (Rupem
Twenty Five Thorgsaejd mciusive of interest, in
additicn to theetnetrnitlAiéfifiertiiifiii:i’3.?”_’th’e;Tribuna£, in fuii and fine!
settiement efvivthe is filed on behalf of the
parties to this _ef”fec’t; hi it
3. vr,VeispeEnAcient~~.§ Ieserence Company has agreed to deposit
gthe seiti 6 weeks {rem the date of preparation of
fiiivgard, faiiinéfg ..whVic’h”.Vthe said amount shall carry interest at 9% p.e.
‘ciat-e ofdefault, til? the date of deposit.
‘:’1.F.he.§entire enhanced cempenseticn amount shail be released
V’.ViVir;–iféveur of the appeiiant.
W
3
S. This miscellaneous first appeal stands disposed of in terms of
the Joint Memo. The award of the Tribunal shali stand modified
accordingly. Grew up the Award accordingly.
RR