High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Kallappa Basappa Pujar vs The Land Tribunal on 26 February, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Kallappa Basappa Pujar vs The Land Tribunal on 26 February, 2009
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
IN THE HIGH coum' or-' KA:2NATA¥A§ H if 'if   "

cmcuxr BENCH AT DHARWA_{)_..  A  I

saw: THIS THE 25*" my  EfE4I3.t2i.}fifi'{,'  

3553"?      
me HONBLE MRJUSTICE  '5HANTANA6f5UDAR
wsm" _:>__r:;TI[m~; Na.

BETWEEN:

1. I&'AI.LAPi3A 15;A;::gaPPé 'étsifié. ~  '  
SINCE-DEC)"-3%ASEI.1%:BY H{$'L.RS.  V

A) H1a.:Z}4IJ':v:A%I'i'i-I'v *  -~ ._ ' "  '   *
s1o.mLLAPpA PU.T_;%31R   " ~ «. 
AGED 60 YEARS,  »A§fi?ICULTI}RE

B) R;..1'.A;PM Sza ;<:ALLA?:3A PUJAR
...:~;:;;£:,p :25 mags',  vAGRICUI.TURE

 LA  ;a;;a3VA"R.z0 AACHJMATTI
--  TsA1:::»'3)A':'1':..3*;:x:.UI<
 "-BELGAEM DIST'.  PETITIONBRS

  {By Sari: sgazsswssza BAMALAGOUDAR, A}i)V.,)

  1.'  :rH33LéxN1:3 TRIBUNAL
r   SAUPJEATTIQARASGAD)
 _ __E_f~;' rrs cmmmm, SAUNDATTI



.g.

5"')

TEE STATE GF KARNATYAKA

BY IT S SECRETARY AND COMLMISSIONER,
REVENUE DWT. VEHANA SOUDA
BANGALORE

3. LAZRIAMAPPA S910 LAXAMAPPA PU:{AR,  '1 'A '  "
oc1iAGA;L
      

A) RAGLLAVENERA 'ACHAR¥A VAMANACHARYA

MALLAPUR     

R/ovcom B'UI1:m3~z:}, '--- 

M NO5256, JA2\.f$.;»'~'..PP23.-,"

. « }Z~'Y31')ERA}}3AD" '
.  ANDRA  .  RESPONTDENTS

 (B&*«s§e:  HCGP FOR RLR2
   VATRSJ-1§fe6_----~VN<:v_r:cE DISPENSEE) wma)

This xxéiit pefition is flied under Articles 226 and 227 of

  Qonsfimfion of India, praying to quash the oxder dated

 '=ilj'f..;4.2"€_)(}7 passed by the fixst zespondcmt-Land 'I'rib1ma.l,
__ -Sa111':'a;datti (Parasgaci) under Am1exure~G, etc.

  -~~ 'I'his writ petition coming on for extiars, this day the
 n  made the fol10W1'ng:-



ORDER

Deceased petitioner, viz., Be$€g’pfia*

filed Form N93? for gent of eccufijajiey righte the ;

land bearing Sy.No.80, eez*e:s;V’:si1;uated in
Kadadhal, Soundatti ‘ is the
landlord of the 3, 4
and 5 also share in the
property made in the

revenue *

2. Feeiinghh the entries made in the

‘:%’f3§.re11tv1e€’«:.re{f§orc1s i1i”‘fav-9131′ of respondents 3 to 5 to an

%e;z,:e§jt’ee£% of the land, respondents 3 to 5 filed

eppealhh _A the Assistant Commissioner. The

A}-=;$_istant~~ Commissioner alioweci the appeal and set

order relating to entries made in favour of

h’ -xeepefindents 3 to 5 herein. Questioning the said order,

gfeepondents filed revision petition, which aiso came to

}./:>

-5-

Sy.No.8(}. If it is so, the erder of this “dated

25.2.2004 necessarily means” that the entizfe

shoulci be granted in favour of the

who are legal heirs of 0rig’na1 v:z.,_: 17L,,g;a;$ssea by the Land Tfibunai is liable

‘ “t<1ji,",¥3eV'*q;1a.shed_.Land same is quashed. Petitioners are

of occupancy rights in respect of 25

…i.n% 8y.No.8O Kagadhal Village, Saundatti Taluk.

P"

-5-

Form No. 10 shall be issued in faveur of the: petri

by the Land Tribtinal, after fulfilling the
formalities.

*c1</~ " 5i%}; % .; 3 %

fionerg ' [ .