Sri Khirappa Jyotiba Savant vs The State Of Karnataka on 22 October, 2008

H: mm man mum or   T} J

cmcmr amen A':\nmRwA:)'   »«

DATED mm mm 22!» am. 

PREsgHf    %_
Honrnw ncn.Jns1':§:m3mgrAi< 

I-IOH'l!_LE  um:

 

Amiga; ii6,u2xg_9'"br~"2£oos jg)

nsrwnzg-_§:----V%.  

 Jyotiim "t_.__" .
Aged about 69   r   
Occ: Agricuitugtist, ' ' "

R/o Ba}.-zanur Vfllagé, 

 'pm :  _ ..A.Prm.L.Ax1'.

'  (By  Sahukar, Adv.)

V «VI.  of Karnataka,

'' : L.DmcparI1nc:J.t of Revenue,

  I§2i.S.Bmld' m' g,

" Dr.Ambedkar Vccdhi,
BAHGALO% -- 61.

V    The Lanfi Tribunal,

Bclgaum, represented ;

By '13 Secretary,
BEIILGAUM. 7%



Smt Laxmibai,
Since deceased, by her L.Rs.,

Sri.Babu Rama Savant,

Age: Major,  V
R/o Tudiya,  
Tq: Chandgad Kolhapur,
 T&.

Sri. Sadashiv Murgappa  "'  ,
Since deceased, by his L.Rs.,'=.  

 

Smtzsulochana,   --_
W/oSadash.ivBa1:i. ' % _  
   

D/0    _  
Pushpsé    

DI   ' 

Vifiya  V   '  n " ~ ' "
D/osadashiyz    

Rajenérg % sm~m_1:iv_ 
$,'9 Sadashjsi  '

-"€3h2.n§dmshc1§ha1~-~sadashiv Bali,

%  S,lo"Sadfé::s}v1iv Baii.

 V .I§?c:'-_;V5(a:1é:%1d4§§:nt"1*5os.4 to 9 are Majors,

- " R/o 'Mi1na'Ma'11i,
' »..Saundatti Taluk,

mam. nmxmuu.

_Sri. Maruti Ramachandra Patil,
V Vflge: Major, R/o Tudiyc
' =-Chandagw, Taluk Kofilapur,
 1flA.

 

T' (Sri.C.S.Patil, AGA for R-1 as R-2,

Sr:E.Chandraka11th R. Goulay,
Adv. for R--IO)

*_*__-k_1I2__*__*___*_ -E

.. RESPOHDEHTS.



This Appeal is filed under Secfion 4 of the  High
Court Act, praying to set aside the Order passed  
No.35616/2002 dated 19.12.2007.  L 'X L' d on '  

This Appeal coming on for   

nmrnx vmmm J, delivered the foliowin-g_:z

-;.LH...1.3.....S.3o E..!§;.;,..

a......._.

Sri.  j "  counsel appeared
for appellant,    Government
Advocate   Nos.1 and 2 and
Sri.   counsei appeared for

respondent No.9"onA.¢émreate,  - d

2. With éogscni; heard.

arrayed as respondent No.4 in

decided by learned Single Judge on

19;22t;+2’oo7f.n.d-dti Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the

.4 ‘.Qonstttuti§;n of India was filed by respondent No.10 chalienging the

– ‘B’ dated 22.04.2002 passed by the Land

Belgaum, with regard to R.S.No.27 measuring 12 acres

” guntas situated at Bakanur V11lag’ e, Belgaum.

4. Nodoubt, it is true that this is the fourth round of litigation

between the same parties for the aforesaid piece of land.
“®