High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Krishnamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 January, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Krishnamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 January, 2009
Author: Jawad Rahim


¥–«I

as ms HEGH zzeasm” G? %<s'~'s£f€ATA§<A A'? 8Aii§ALQR;,:E "»..V

wags: T2-12$ Ti-{S 53" my ca? IANHARY 2959- I "

BEFORE

""'i-i"" §–:'G§5'BLE MR. 3usncE:;:jA*a%;§':}

;&..;;z ?__,..:éQ
amvaarq

i~f.a'~'=..1S?-i§'~ifid'-éiJR"§"*r-2"z' ._

S/'C? Kfi?*5i"2i°iFP;'a

ASEB 25 yams % _ V
mzvsa, Rig-1,94s:;;z ~

15? CRQSS,'fi§*."MA§_Ng VA
'\?3?'4*3–"BM'3%s~"s:?€3fiiii'I~%;'« "

ALSQ s-.:~;.azLasLs A:<a%;::»smaz
vzaaaiae, r?€S 3:33:33, Fast T;-a–:: court-x, £)AVA?§FsGER§_,’=}I_?é, r._’
CRL=A,?8,f€_3?, %

fhis §é’£§f§f:fi coming am far admissicm
mafia the fcaiiowizsg 2 ”

Cemsitteé accused is if} Crif;::..?fi”5;'”?;}?. ‘3éa£Hed
3:::.4.2aas an the fiie %g-;ff’%%J%:.,}uct§%é¥fIX%*%ak;:i%%*3-rac§:%’%’c§ur:~:,
mvangere, ceafirméfig the dated
:a.s.2eo? er: the ft;-_’é 1 can-wctina
the accizseé fa?’ ufider Secticns 2?9,

33? arzd 3z$4»:g,’z;%%;gt,«V

2. “fie cefi’i.:a,::£;%:uai faéti

‘%fi’g ~,;e§%?;:§z;~:.-g;1::,%;_fr_f__ §*;:ea:”eir: whiie drivirm ferry bearézia

12.7.2686 at 2.69 p.m., was 50 ‘raafz

vafid ~fi}éaii@”é2é§.”_v»:h’é§f’he hit assainat a ‘WS magma bearing
§*é–4;~.i{:5e~fi’?-zi.’¥§;5€.i’§ driver: by CW2 (Fsanjaanth) aiérag with
éfi the wish; they were farsieedine near

§TA;.–R’.RV.’Séfie§§ 5:”: Pfifiead.

(9,@,

«ii
the was’ was 23:3: rsarrew arzé ifzefe were many pecpée
wai§<:i:':a er: the maé and thus, amassed Carma? egcape the

charge (2? riegiigence. Whiie cenfirmiw f;GEW'§€:t§£?m §f"=.§':&

accusefi far we fifféfzié imitated shave, iéi'!§éfi€Yf?fé7e'§VV"E2%§§.§§'-.V

Shawn regarfiing serienrze. Aggrieveé by H

the §ef:€US&§ is befaré tifiifi cizurt,

3. Learfiefi teuafiei fer the izatéticriza- f;’T Sr?§.P,,;r§sé§.’:,.%i§~€;21 : ‘::a__r”¢*e a§’é.i:%”z”3*i” ‘7t*r;é
aczcuseé was net braved Ea the ‘::*:aé:§vaf”é€;2e:wn”‘te3..§a3;é, wauie’

ifiiéiéfifi tiéai the firsi aiaieéiaia?:§z:2%ff» f_L::§”re-»a;::§ra§Sa§ «:2?

:-

&<s'é§er:$é;,_ i-13¢ £§V§?'5?3§€3}fi'ffG¥fi 'i%}_&:–View taken 5'»; the tréai Cmzrt

that ne§§§§ja::§ia% if: '%.'r'sé1" f§'T;*,§'~.}"':'~;:.~":, ?g' 6? the zinetitiéner WES wéved.

§-«ta wagzié gubzrrééi» i%V3"e"a§:;éeiiate judge was right fir: aiiéfiiififi

.¢_é:2té"§§§:3_%z'*«Qf the acauseé that if: the circssmstances Er:

'fir.§c%f:'__iiie-.é::::'_ifié§f'eccizrreé, Eééiéfiéfi iafifiéi ha Whé§§'y' heid

_%ia§§e"…sr ?.__§*:&-frfsiéhaé, as rzegiigence in the firivifig of the ma

" ':3".'A"*.fi§2eg§erzréfiéi' cezaié mi be mied cut. He submiis, Whéfi thé

TS';:A.§ési&%i?..'éé ccurt came it': fifléfi ccrsciusiém, it generated

jf-re=aém1abié doubt in the mind sf the tear: abaut rzrizraf cf

VA " ~ §aaéir§er;ce against the accassed ané fiéfifiéfiiiefiiiif fiéfiéfif

2%"

:/