High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Lakkuraiah S/O Boralingaiah vs The State Of Karnataka Kunigal … on 30 September, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri Lakkuraiah S/O Boralingaiah vs The State Of Karnataka Kunigal … on 30 September, 2008
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar


-. ..- u.— –u—— -uv-am» -was wIn’II’IIIl”I|”I!II’I us:-III: VIVVVIIII ‘VI IIl”IlIlIl’1II1S\l1 SIIVIII #573″: ‘VI I\rl.I’lscvl”$Il”1xI\l”‘I Iivmrli ‘

4 ‘.:;&y :E:«.:.:_. Vamiamxsgmfi, 2-may 2

3;

are max mummy mmamm AT

Sflffifl “1”Hi$”i”‘HE saw my 05* 5′:EP’PEMBER..§:é;:{§:;’:? 3:’:’.

BEFORE

mg mmmw
E0R31a.LINE’$_'{£AI-i %
;vy::_»;;m .n;.m:%”1=.,..~»;:3v–*:»;%”Es mma 3
ma : V’ ‘ ”

M ‘A * . ma Aéézégfizswarmm
A §e:’%:;i1>~2z”,:.»-?::4s=;.1:4;'<V%.m:a3:a:";E

. ._?L%?:.'$itr*§%»1cI*.

2     nmcwmr

C

:;”:m..,.w :3 mam Uf5.3§’H1} cams;

__§@~:fi.%£::.§-::;a*r W 33′: ASIDE iffim myumem Jumawm,
V_”€::E;.~:§§.:71%’}Er7.§.*{::r2{?::§::°:§’V;E. eg SEWZW-l’fl*E @3339. Rmmm ma

‘:§;’£§nj..£uQ$£:3F.E9 ?E~’«.E5E{> B755 ‘mm Ffilz. 8.3. €JIEi..}3I’U S;

I:*€.”£..TNI!;’.”-IéP.3.s m ::..:.::..m. W95 mm A150 1’0 SE1′
‘ m3’*1E’3E Tm Imwmw, mmvxcrzww 5. EEN’I’ENE’lE

~.——.–u –.- yu–xsuz-nun

2

tmag; ma. lfi.3.2%Z3E§6 mmm E? ‘mm 9.0., E.’.I:’.r;: “~’—-,

$3.”, T{TEv~§Ei13E%. IN GP«.E”A..3€’3. 3.33.s’2GC}fi.

‘$331552. szazzazzxmg REVISIEDR PE’E’I’£’If.3%I’;’ «%§fi*eI~1ti9*;’;”%%
QN Wgfigé. KEARINE T313 E37133, THE

TEEE E3′.L’31”.a1l.s%I}*E*3’IL!*E’G:

QREER

“‘%.”‘Ez*.:ia: Rwiaimi patkicri kg
a.::::%.1eEs?:ti The pat§t§cr21fiz;” :%:i*a~af;’V– ofienccs
§.w14.1z13F;az”$rm.%::n§;a S5 3{)4{A)
maf IKE. “§§’}1a partias and
afim” *€.?3%£I!.1T’}?Y’§’§-:%.i:~%T’iV€?»;’E”.;§V;iIf:£.v% ramrd, swnvioted
‘aha . asentemsad him to

Lzndm-:’g;%« f%§i? a periczd af four montha

«fine *arj§g.mm;–. The order of the

7&3; mm masiana Caurt in

% QszA.I9§a:%. m{::31_;gj:%5.

Q’.«.._’§’*]:”is& cam: mHl1a fimaaautimn in brief is that
;:,2»a’¢wiI ‘ta’IIl=nun’I\u tr: !\.a'”1e’.a3var’nal’M§A¢”fix :IuwII__.\n\r-uni Ir! Iarxnsvrild-Inrt Illwlt \p\ufIuOllul Ill l’M’l!\§Wl”Ilrll\.!’l IIIIJWI Iufiulhinl VI l\l’1l’llVI!’|Ii”H’\l’1 IIIWII ‘¢\flU¥\ ‘U’

3

Apfigé mm mm Bamalm in Kunigal and dashgei

agagnm the right aside drainage ,3 _

E:3%i&saré3ka%1:’é,e and; mmaquenflyg thus yuan ”

ffi} émtm the tank; ‘Tha paeaangefi Qf

R&m.d.m§ flhivamma and 52$
£~?am?3:1ivm am an the 25
pammm mmtamed ‘ fan:

§fims;:»fg.m~ mg sta;i1f1e:w§§:.;§g:;riaa€ég§§.;§éé’ ifij

3. t:V® V£c _,v pmsmution in
z%2¢*zzx’x%i;§.&z>§; j:L};wg3;{4f¢ ‘ %fi*é:g:&5aa:es and got marked

fatty “=’§’Wi’J~’ 15, 1′? to ‘.20 and PWa-

aand injumd persona.

-mf fiecmased Shivamm, who

m.ma3 aftmr the aémident and identified
%%?:;g~;s:13% :25? smvmm pwsm 85 22 are the punch
tea the ape’: mahazar Ex:«P5«. PW3~27 ta 29
{Rectum whim treated tha imgumd £3 Kunigal

§:§:%3’V’€i\. Em-ayitaln PW-=28 cmndumtsfi autaaysy an the

.~/5

6

are last. in View of the same, this Court_…d Cé:$’4:*:3}Cit_

find any ground ta reduce in the s e_:§ta.:n(: e ‘~ ai.-:§o’.’4

Accordingly, revisicm petition £.3f1’e–._é.a:mé

dismissed.

nan |..:e-nu I-nII-In-rlllfld” *1′ “”””””‘ “”””‘ ‘ ‘ ‘”‘ “‘ ” “” ‘” ‘ ‘ ‘”
I”! I..I£”|1I..i ¥f\!\’l’I\-IKIIII-!”\i .31″! !!If!l”\”\ LIIHILI 5-l\l\M’IIulkt§l¥l\l _i(‘\ in