High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri M A Parthasarathy vs The Bangalore Mahanagarapalika on 7 August, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri M A Parthasarathy vs The Bangalore Mahanagarapalika on 7 August, 2008
Author: N.Kumar
M4

:3 THE mam CGURT or KARNATAKA, AT    _

fiamd this 1:116 "F31 day effiyggust, ;_?3§;)(}8: : , 
BEFORE'.  % % %
THE HDIVPBLE flit   

 Petition NIB, 638§3..-:_>§';20Qé: _(m§Br«:.z?§ 

 :

Sri M 1"; Par'ii1a$:«3}3"z»:;fi:j;j;%V--

Agfsd 31 years H    .
Sfo iait: M A 55I*i11};Va&§é;:i:__ b  _  M.
Ric: $3001'Na:>.1;..V§T2t?i;{31*os«g:  «-

RM*v* €xt§:as:_rm A' '  "
Saciaahivazgagar

Baglgalore --- 23360 08$ V  V' W

 Arm; 

3 5 4 Petitions!

' 'V _ ("gr I'v"§,I_ $"ifagci'=3vi Pssseciates, Acivoeatns}

.. 3  Mahanagarapaiika

" A Eiéfpévxizijticria {:3fi§.CI3S
«J C 
Bangalore -- 56:3 662
Refijsrsisented by itfi {fcmmissiener

r _»_'i'L"'r,;..+3:= [}i:t:ctor Genaral and §31Spf.'.Ct{$;t3' Creitneral
{if Puzsii-:13 £11 Ketrzlataka
Nrupathunga Road
Bangalere -- 560 962

The Commissioner of i3'03i¢:t3:
infanfiy Read

k/M



N3

Bangaiore w-- 566 O0 1

4 Thxit inspector 01' Felice
Saciasbivamagar Felice» Station

Sanieisilivallagm'   _
Rangalrxres ---- 56% {}8f}

U1

The Kaxnataka Lokaaynktha

M S Btzilciixzgs  

Vidhaua Vcediii

Bangaiore ---- 5:56 001  _ = ¢_ 
Regmaented by its Re;gist:ra1*-------- _  " Respvandasmtfi

{Ir-331 Sn' Ash-3k  far 1?};
 B; Veexappa, :'.».(3A:fo:*~Rf2----§R'}:--~
511} S K E-'t;11kaia§'Re;{i.L&iy,"Aiiyu»::ai:j&ibI' R5)

This Wn't.Pafi€;_iQn .Es'~fiii35i '-11_1'1Cier§!5L1"EiC1t3$ 226 and 227 of
that Cozzsfittitiafiggf iiiéiia, "1:srVé1-3,fi11g.'i«10""issue a writ in $113 namre
of pfOi1iE_ifi0;_!§., t.;:Csf111':}&Eii1{ii:),Vga"-i;I1C iwspozadent No.1, its ofic:-era
sic" from'A_in:mdatiI1g'-.the. jzrgipgaarty of thf: pctitionm' bearing
No.1, 12'-ii fiflrijas, R15d'1'eI VEX{€?11SiV()fl, B:3_11ga10:'e~8O, in army Way,
and 3130 pi3€:Vfi;1'£§}1g  cictsiistixlg $116111 fmm excavating the
earth 01'» the band "Side" in any way affecting the existéng

-v.s:§Q1z133;z;5:%::;  sepai*a:i:1_g_¢ti1e Esaxmey Tank, Qangalore «-80, from
 .V 3:116 grczpeffy of She pcfifionm:

    VuE'"'.f.f'?.:i7i'iZi()I} comizjg on for p:mijm3'na1y htfzaring in
'B' Group thj§é_"_:.1afgt, the Chart mantle the following:

ORDER

u x V ” +T11.evV1V§e:tiiio1:1€:r has preferred this Writ Petiticm seeking a

V’ the natum of pmhibzition, commanding Q1: first

:€’c:”:31js#:::11{ient, its oficers, c::t:::,3 iiom inimdating the pm-party of

filfi petitioner bsarixxg No.i, 1:23′ crass, R.M.V.E;x£t:x;sion,

;\t/

Baxlgaimre-80, in any way and also greventing and deeiefing

fizem £1-em excavating the earth 011 the hand side

afieefing the exieting C{}II1B}011 wall K V’

Tank, Ba11gai0re–8(}, from the pmpefifef
other consequential reliefs. i < * , ..

2, The pfififioner eiaims
healing No.1, 12:1: cmss, .13amga:¢r¢§so. The
grievance 91″ the pe’fi’i;io:ner ‘ie the firs:

I’€iiSp€.}11€§Jf;5I1i, is ¢v’a} :~vL”QfVV Vproperity thereby

aiiewing zjeratef properigr of the petitioner and
mndezifig Atf”:ge”$aic’i submerged in the Water of

the Sarakey respcmdelat has been excavating

‘ ‘é;he& 3..};}f33Z1s’:*§:§if:l:: to the hand side thereby causixlg

4fi:s_.e ‘¢:0mm0n W333 :3epaI”a1;:i:ng the property Of the

pefifiezeer tiae Sankey Ta111t:tii:iQ13.£:1§._a.111;iV._V§§§*t::’§i: i*f3i%~§.}[*;~::%f1ci:::1ts 1 and 2
not to iniezferfi Eomession and
snjoymeni pmcmdjngfii this
C£arpc:rat13%;>n finovafing, the Cic-I’pora”rics11
had fenccfsi’ if order to protget the pmpexty.

‘i’h-zrtzfcn’-av, w”.4isV.kq¢§,d”‘:i;:1 fi1etvaf¢3resaid W’n’i: Pefifion by an Qxdar

‘§.amd’ fixevvfiiiésfion of Cicrrporafion intczfezing wifll

‘fi3:.f3 “;§::»!sfi::ssion ané enjoyment of the pefificnefs

Iiflt aziset. The said Writ Petition was disposad

‘-‘«.__ri)f the seconnd mspcmdemi: nfiiciais not to enter uyon

v.p%:fifi9nefs pmpertyr beysnd the fenced area czaf Sanka};

Fllrther, iii: bald if maiiy fhare is any dispute in regard to

, jibe extent or oihsnvism {ha parties are at Iiherty to Wqrrk 9111′:

their mmeiiy in accordance with law, Wham ahwfiy

pe€i”i::iQ3:1t::;r*’s §*ic:va11ce has been cansidered by this

csrder has been passed resexving the liheny to _& V’

wcark 911′: big remedy, the second Writ” filed f<§;1' ?1;§V'$é1mé.

§311I'§0S6 though dificmfifiy Werdjed is

Frozzr. the avermefits in tha gaeijficfi 'é"i1&–.:ér1iér fiifiééeéimgs VV

it is cigar there firadsts a di3§L1'£e,%i€é't:€;t;' {f:i::::v: pefiifianéf and the
Corporafion Ivsrgaxztiing thfiif It is in the

manna of a 'bc:1:;3:3§é3£}r_ ifi ié"_€2pei1 the pfififioner to

appmach 3 seelcjng appmpriaiz:

d€3C1£EI1’3fi(}I1S’–v “”v_iI1}”?_§111t;?’¥Zi()}J. The disputegi
{;_1’13stien ¥<;:f 'title '01" encroachment if any and

iI1tBIfEI'(iI}C!3VV"C.¢S111I;1{)i §';it3;'.§3;{);?.2!,£§j:iI11:(} in a Writ Petition as it is a

.._:::;;i:s{;é{§.«.¢}§;;1;'1ve$s*£:i;r1 axafi fact and mquims mlai. Under these

‘ CirCu13;1sf§311-<i:::s3§ '*~. as the petitioner has an alternate and

efiigéséjouvs this petiticsn is not maintaixlable, Hence,

V flint: }§€5fifi€ai%t.i;:-§"§i3miS$£3d resmvirlg the liberty ta) the petitioner

aitemate remedy.

V 1 ‘ 7:

_ gtsgr…

sa/-4
Judge