'ski \/Krishna Murthy, Adv.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANG/°§£..CV')':;:{;'TE._V'
DATED THIS THE 2"" DAY OF NovEMaER,_{2'o1.'c;~ _
BEFOREM % V T
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
WRIT PETITION
BETWEEN: % % 1
Sri M.C.Krishne Gowda _ 1
Son of Sri Channe Gowda, V 9
Since deceased 'bis E;A_R.s_
1.
Smt. V.
Aged ab0vz1t’»’4a_yearAs’,. A.
Wife’ o’f’T’ia.te-Esra ‘f%fi’;’C.’KriShne G’0vQda.
2. Sri K.Kiran ” A ._
Aged abogut .27 yea~rs.
of Sri B{I.C.Krish..n.e’Gowda.
3.
Aged ~ab0_ut 24};/ea_rS’,
‘=..=»D/o. late Sri VM.C;_.<[rishne Gowda.
" * ~'.A"n. are residing at No.944,
awe'. Mam, III Stage, III Biock,
" B'a.sa~{e's%:A'waranagara,
' Béhgaglore — 560 079.
A 1 ..PE’TITIONERS
Hence the question of vacating the temporary injxun_cti.on
does not arise, as it is not in force” has been qu_r;:’s’ti4oifie_ici~7i3_y
the legal representatives of the plaintiff…i_in’f._th–is
peuuon.
4. I.A.No.10 was filed-i__.under__iRu|e 4″i31f: 39 if
CPC. While dismissing I.A.i\iof1io:; the o’b–s.er\/iatiogn noted
supra been made. An order –passed~.._by”‘acourt in exercise
ofjurisdiction under Ruies..:1;–..2 CPC can be
the subject i_of_cha!_|e”ng_e si_n”ia’r’i””appea| under Rule
1(r) the writ petition is not
maintainableyy availabiiity of aiternate
remedy, whiich,th’e petitioners can invoke.
. A11ri’T’i’sthe..__resu|t; iiii the writ petition stands dismissed,
to the petitioners to question the
objectioVn~ablie’ part of the impugned order noticed supra by
tit'”._i”‘ayai|ino-the remedy of appeal.
–ri’The contentions raised in this writ petition against
“the impugned order are kept open for consideration.
£-
4′ s
The certified copy of the impugned order be
to the petitioners without any deiay.
Ordered accordingly.
Sac* V . V