_, , , 3 Ma_nd3'a§
' . _ é 'Manager
E3.S.Indiresh, Advocate far R2; R1~Service of neticei
j rfif.sp3n$.5d with}
~, 't'}'3'é3' juzigmeni: and award" dated 3i.€}8.i2C307, gassed £11 MVC
Nc:s.10'?';'2006,cm the {its :31" their Pmmiding Officm", Fast Track Ccaurtw
' H, Manciya, partiy" allewing the ciaim petition for compensatien
IN THE man COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALOARE %
DATED THIS THE 03313 {)AYV'J(i}'V§"'JU1\J'ii}, M
BEFCJRE M A. " V' "
THE HOWBLE MR. JUSTQVE1%V.JA&AmA?a?HA;§" '
M.F.Af :i~Ig.s58ii"20é8 (Rim 4 V'
BETWEEN: 4' .' %
Sr}. M.C.Nagcnd1a__ '
S/0. Chowdegowda V . _ .
Aged about 43 V ' --' "
R/a:
Mandya Taluég ¢_ Appellant
(BY Sri ' , Advocates}
AND: . - * V "
1. G.¥{.S:1re3ha" _
Sfo. _ V.
" < 0;. Nearufit-1ya1ak$.hmi Talkies
- .L__fsr1_:s_shwara Nagam
V 'Gric.r;taJL._I1isurancc Co. Ltcip
-Gpy. i"'.'I'. C. L. , M11. Road
¥*v'§.a:_:1:;1yz1. . . . Respcmdenis
This appsal is fiisd under section 1373(1) sf M,V.A(:t, against
and 'seeking e11ha.m:<=.-metxt cf canzpensatian.
This appeal coming on far adznissimz ibis day, ihf': Cctmrt
passed the: foliowing;
JUDGMENT
The award passed by the Tribunal
appellant is called into question
flund that quantum of compensaticiu on l,c§we°r side, ‘V
having regard to the medicai evi&e.fice onhzeeeifi…
2. The learned Cxxmieel fe-fmtiiet téiiibfixits that
the medicai evidence reVe’é1%::_’ti:Lat:V’Vtt:e had suffered
15% Whoie the fracture sustained
by him gmdv _Aii1..%_V£.a'(1;»t’ii;t:i(}Ix,.jttihtirt in§111ées were also caused to
him. the four injuriesk the MAC’? has
awarded aV”*::Qt131V3ei”::fse1it)11.:’«’§;f 4Rs.23,GO0/~ towards “loss of
fi.1t1iI:E._i i.fi(:fi]}1€2”, on the lower side. The MAC?’ has
ztcxiz._ e.w2;;{c§1ed4 fl::o:r:pensat:i0n uncier the heaci “pain and
‘cempensat:ic:13. awardeé under the heads
V _ “meciécal –.eXpe1’ises” and “$933 of amenities of life” is on the
h 4’ ‘ = leaflet’ sié’-:~:–;
3. Taking note of the above ezxbmission, hearing the
‘”gi.e’arz1ed Counsel for the mspondtentj insurance company and
on perusal of the evidence on record} them is jusfification to
inerease the compezlsatien under the above heads.
3:»
4
4. In View of 15% pB1’II181″1CIit disability
body’, the appellant Wouid be enfifleei “tc ¢_c’e;I:1§)e:};§$a’iiQfi:V”oi;
(Rs.3,0{)0/- (in<;:0me} x 12 (menthsl X
{disability} .7 35,75,600/–; Rs.V75.;5'QO/–,xwheiweaés £ig§%"'MAeT
has awarded eompensafizug of Ti;1A1:'s-,A uiider the
said head, the appeiiafif enhanced
V
coaamensation of and Sufferizlg"
Rs.35,0(}()/-- 1,15 tmatrnent taken, finither filimv and towards "loss of
amenities of to the Whoie body éisabifity
and age 51* sum of R’s.3{),OO{)/– is
V 5, ” {the total eampensation gets enhanced by
Re{ 1 The said amount will carry interest at 6% per
Tiqevappeai is aiiowed in part. The award stands
accordingiy.
%!__,e
T6393
SNN