IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST 2§)'1c--.' _
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE :31; 'V: T T
WRIT PETITION No.2Qe542/2010"tEDN¢RE:s)f: Q'
BETWEEN:
Sri. M. Devaraj
S/0. late Muttu Raj
Aged about 53 yearsv I 1 . ..
R/a. No.60, Giddamrjia Layqub
Akash Nagar __
A. Narayana}55ur;{"vV ' . .
Near White H0us'e 1C;__ 3 V "
Opp. to K;R§T'Puxfiam I3»':)'iice'~.¢Vfati0n
Bangalore " ' PETITIONER
(By Sri. Ni$§ar:Sab; ";Ad"'»'-Q) »-- V.
Reg1stra1~.."'~ A V "
The Bangalbrf; Ufiiéersity
Jnana"Bharathi Campus
% _Bang'3;;1ore.__'-I560 O56 RESPONDENT
" " 'T 1 ' -- Keshava Reddy, AGA) *$=|=Il=*
This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and of.
the Constitution of India praying to direct the –re’spondent. 1 ”
University to provide chance to petition.erv.”‘to ‘fwxfite
examination of his remaining 3 subjocts–.in 35*, V2*”*-=..andv_3§d
years LLB. and etc.
This petition coming on.a’for Pré’ii_minar’yrV.Ha=aring
Group this day, the Court madeVthe’~’fo11owin.g:~’
In this case, the .:fe;–:~a direction to
the respondent§Uniirersitj(A”to ‘ appear in the
examination of’1’e_ma3;1i1ing3–..s’ubjeets,_’1nV_itst, 2nd and 3″ year
LLB. couvdrseq it _ .
2. ‘Lea.r11e.d ‘Cot1Ar1se1’fo_r”~the’petitioner submits that the
petitioner ” not ‘further opportunity to take
examination.
;b_A-Learnedtttt Counsel for the respondent–University
ptalnirginstruotion from the Additional Legal Advisor of
thei”esponden’t–t3niversity, who is present before this Court,
it
submits that the University will provide a last chance for,_the
petitioner to appear for the aforesaid examination.
4. The submission of the learned C_onn’sel.jfor the
parties is placed on record. The réspo’ndent¥’lJ1ii\fersitjr-.’i§?]A
directed to grant a last opporfirnity to the to
appear for the aforesaid d__exa1nina_tion_. __VI-Iovxhrever, he? is not
entitled for any further’= opportlitrritflpjjtol”appear for the
examination. Writ petition’=sands._disp’ose.d:;v accordingly.
N” “‘°StS’
sd/~