Sri M Gopalakrishna vs Smt S Sowmya @ Kavya on 3 November, 2008

IN THE HIGH coum or KARNATAKA AT BANGA§..w;'3--§§.E': ' 

DATED THIS THE 3*" on or: NOVEMBER,...2 {'§0$' 7T.f  3 T
BEFORE  M

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Asytok"i3;% %HINcHMI{;f.ég:"

cm... PETITION no.113:1oF 2oi3%3

BETWEEN     
SRIMGOPALAKRISHNA

SIGNMUNIYAPPA

AGEDZMYEARS

RJA No.2o7,MuNEs;3wo;xJR0Ab,

n:A(;A1AHNAPA1«vA5 % A '

MARUTHISEVANAGARA.._P£JST A

flANGAL()RE~3_3 M A V  %
 -- V  ,..PETITIONER

« kk (ext 59.: sme1L%s% ma, ADVOCATE)

AND
swig SQWWA @_ AKAWAVV. .....

wig SRIVGGPALAKRXEHNA

AGEB AEOUI 23 'r'EA§;s---.
Rm Nc,83;_ G0wR:£$iiAM"'
 " =.__KRISHNAPE"A GARBEM;

 C 2* RAMAi's%__flAGAR 9057,
_ * T §AhEG:.Ai..0RE-93 
_ L _ T  RESPONDENT

   =   (BY SR} (.1 3 GQPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE)
%   Ttfzzs CRLJ3 IS FILED U/8.482 crmc 5*: "ma ADVOCATE ma
;THEx PETXTIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HOWBLE COURT MAY BE
 --91__E§kSED TO QUASH me IMPUGNED ORDER DT.1fi.2.2008 PASSED av

 'IH¥:' XI ADDL. CMNL, MAYO HALL, BANGALGRE IN FCR !\£9.9/2908

" TAKING COGNISANCE AGAINST 'me pmmomen FOR HAVING
COMMITTED AN OFFENCE U/S. 494 OF THE IPC AND U15. 1? OF THE

HINDU MARRIAGE ACT,
This petition coming on for admission this 
made the following:
The petitioner has sought the quezihinoof the
16"' February, 2008 passed   the¥ Adcii.tion'ai" 
Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayoheii,_"'B:e"ngaioré._fn"*ei5Ci5t}iiio.9 of V
2008 taking cognizance e§e.i_nst_«"i'ti1§j'j4petit'i.onerVifsorv having

committed an offence'  Indian Penai

Code and Section 1?' oi'~the Hindgii eiiilerriiefzjie 1955.
2. Sri :eun_ii.A counsel apibearine for the

petitioner subrinites  of higamy is not supported

by_ an ioteé esridenceiflii   
 »3}*S:ri €::.G%.'.¢epaiaswamy, the learned counsel appearing
 for tihehh-resoonéent"submits that sworn statement of the
v'v".t:orriVi3iaine'nt, 'fimother and her father are recorded. He
 eo_hrni'ts that a chiid is born in/out of the wediock
 petitioner and second wife, hi. Chitre.
  My scope for interference in the proceedings under
 iiection 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is rather limited
Q55.
£9 situations like the cempiainant not disclosing ting
proceedings being witheut jurisdiction, abuse of    
iaw, etc. Whether the petitioner has Cf3f!'iffii«'?iti
Share this:

				
				Facebook
			

				
				X
			
Like this:
Like Loading...


	
Related