IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE.--___ DATED THIS THE 16*" DAY or AUGUST, 2010 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AsHo:<»o.,.H,1N:;%i:e'ER;° it WRIT PETITION No.24995/2o°10 ii*.ALBi5a.:;i:"i).," BETWEEN: Sri MJ. Chikkanna, S/0 Javaregowda, Aged about 45 years, Councilor of CMC, Mandya, V V R/0 2845, 5*" Cross, Gandhinagar, Mandyaflity, _ ,_ . Mandya Taluk and ,D'istri__ct.._»_ ~. :« _ jg: , Petitioner ( By S_ri:- ifitdyocate) AND: _. V % . 1. The State of' Kar'na:ta.i'<a,'~., Represented, by, his . Principal Secretary, Urban -Deveio"pment' Department, _, M.SV.» Building, Ba nga_l_oArr;=.-. 2. The..Ass_is'tan.t'Commissioner of iM'an_dya_Subv-Division and 'i he" Retu'rn_i'_ng 'Officer, CMC, Mandya, City, Mandya. Respondents
— (By Nataraj, AAG and Sri R.Devdas, AGA)
“:lThislyi.f.rit petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the
V.”_’–.Cons~tit’uti’0n of India praying to quash the notification dated
–2j9._7;’201’%0 issued by the Government as per Annexure–D; and
it ” This writ petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing this
day, the Court made the following:
9£_¥3_|3..B.
Pursuant to the interim order granted by this
12.8.2010, the petitioner subrnitted an elaborate ‘
to the respondent No.1. The responder.1.ti~Nr)4.A1 it
the contentions raised by the petitioner”s arm’
elaborate order, dated 16.8.2010 dAow._r1 vthev-.:betitiioner’s
request for a change in the reservationVV.cate’g..ory for–the”..office of
the President of City Municipaillicogunculv _
2. Sri K.M. _.,E\.|a:t;a-_ra3′, irthel_:’V§.ea.rfi~r§¢1.._q_/additional Advocate
General brings to iseiected as the Vice-
President of pal; Cob-nc~ii’, Manaya.
3. Whether the o’r’clf;er».’t:’a:teri~” 16.8.2010 is tenable or not,
whether the goetitionevr can c’ha«i”lenge the said order despite his
getting ¢hi’rnsei.fi.elected”aswtihe Vice–President may have to be
exarn’inéd_r. petitioner challenges the said order.
V7._’Reserving.._4the,l.ibe:rty to the petitioner to challenge the said
‘ * -oriJe_r;-».this petition is rejected.
saw.
runes
rip